Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coelho,Marta Jordana Arruda
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Aguiar,Alana das Chagas Ferreira, Sena,Virley Gardeny Lima, Moura,Emanoel Gomes de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162017000300242
Resumo: ABSTRACT In the Amazonian region, P is often a primary factor limiting sustainable agrosystems. We compared the efficiencies of local aluminous phosphate (ALP) and single superphosphate (SSP) under a cover of leguminous residues to determine the fate of P sources in an Amazonian soil with hardsetting characteristics. The experiment followed a randomized block design with four replications and the following treatments: ALPU, i.e. ALP plus urea (U); ALPL, i.e., ALP plus leucaena (L); SSPU, i.e., SSP plus urea; SSPL, i.e., SSP plus leucaena; and BS, i.e., bare soil (without residues). To assess the residual values of the P sources, we used a sequence of crops consisting of maize, cowpea and cassava. Both ALP and SSP exhibited low P efficiency in BS. The greatest amounts of P and N uptake in the plots where P sources and leucaena residues were added, as in those covered with leucaena residue, resulted in higher productivity levels. These differences are important for the adoption of beneficial soil management practices and the use of P sources to enhance efficiency in tropical soils. The use of residues increased the P use efficiency of both P sources, as it enhanced the uptake of both N and soluble P. The replacement of SSP with ALP may be advantageous in the second year of planting with high-demand crops, but the P of the SSP retained in the minus soluble fractions may be available if the SSP is used in P-depleting crops combined with no-tillage underneath a mulch of residues.
id USP-18_55f34e57d83a9aabde8bb71322cd66d9
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-90162017000300242
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian peripheryP fractionshardsetting soilaluminous phosphateleguminous residuesnitrogenABSTRACT In the Amazonian region, P is often a primary factor limiting sustainable agrosystems. We compared the efficiencies of local aluminous phosphate (ALP) and single superphosphate (SSP) under a cover of leguminous residues to determine the fate of P sources in an Amazonian soil with hardsetting characteristics. The experiment followed a randomized block design with four replications and the following treatments: ALPU, i.e. ALP plus urea (U); ALPL, i.e., ALP plus leucaena (L); SSPU, i.e., SSP plus urea; SSPL, i.e., SSP plus leucaena; and BS, i.e., bare soil (without residues). To assess the residual values of the P sources, we used a sequence of crops consisting of maize, cowpea and cassava. Both ALP and SSP exhibited low P efficiency in BS. The greatest amounts of P and N uptake in the plots where P sources and leucaena residues were added, as in those covered with leucaena residue, resulted in higher productivity levels. These differences are important for the adoption of beneficial soil management practices and the use of P sources to enhance efficiency in tropical soils. The use of residues increased the P use efficiency of both P sources, as it enhanced the uptake of both N and soluble P. The replacement of SSP with ALP may be advantageous in the second year of planting with high-demand crops, but the P of the SSP retained in the minus soluble fractions may be available if the SSP is used in P-depleting crops combined with no-tillage underneath a mulch of residues.Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162017000300242Scientia Agricola v.74 n.3 2017reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoelho,Marta Jordana ArrudaAguiar,Alana das Chagas FerreiraSena,Virley Gardeny LimaMoura,Emanoel Gomes deeng2017-04-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-90162017000300242Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2017-04-07T00:00Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery
title Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery
spellingShingle Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery
Coelho,Marta Jordana Arruda
P fractions
hardsetting soil
aluminous phosphate
leguminous residues
nitrogen
title_short Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery
title_full Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery
title_fullStr Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery
title_full_unstemmed Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery
title_sort Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery
author Coelho,Marta Jordana Arruda
author_facet Coelho,Marta Jordana Arruda
Aguiar,Alana das Chagas Ferreira
Sena,Virley Gardeny Lima
Moura,Emanoel Gomes de
author_role author
author2 Aguiar,Alana das Chagas Ferreira
Sena,Virley Gardeny Lima
Moura,Emanoel Gomes de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coelho,Marta Jordana Arruda
Aguiar,Alana das Chagas Ferreira
Sena,Virley Gardeny Lima
Moura,Emanoel Gomes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv P fractions
hardsetting soil
aluminous phosphate
leguminous residues
nitrogen
topic P fractions
hardsetting soil
aluminous phosphate
leguminous residues
nitrogen
description ABSTRACT In the Amazonian region, P is often a primary factor limiting sustainable agrosystems. We compared the efficiencies of local aluminous phosphate (ALP) and single superphosphate (SSP) under a cover of leguminous residues to determine the fate of P sources in an Amazonian soil with hardsetting characteristics. The experiment followed a randomized block design with four replications and the following treatments: ALPU, i.e. ALP plus urea (U); ALPL, i.e., ALP plus leucaena (L); SSPU, i.e., SSP plus urea; SSPL, i.e., SSP plus leucaena; and BS, i.e., bare soil (without residues). To assess the residual values of the P sources, we used a sequence of crops consisting of maize, cowpea and cassava. Both ALP and SSP exhibited low P efficiency in BS. The greatest amounts of P and N uptake in the plots where P sources and leucaena residues were added, as in those covered with leucaena residue, resulted in higher productivity levels. These differences are important for the adoption of beneficial soil management practices and the use of P sources to enhance efficiency in tropical soils. The use of residues increased the P use efficiency of both P sources, as it enhanced the uptake of both N and soluble P. The replacement of SSP with ALP may be advantageous in the second year of planting with high-demand crops, but the P of the SSP retained in the minus soluble fractions may be available if the SSP is used in P-depleting crops combined with no-tillage underneath a mulch of residues.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162017000300242
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162017000300242
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola v.74 n.3 2017
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1748936464314400768