Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/130948 |
Resumo: | In the Amazonian region, P is often a primary factor limiting sustainable agrosystems. We compared the efficiencies of local aluminous phosphate (ALP) and single superphosphate (SSP) under a cover of leguminous residues to determine the fate of P sources in an Amazonian soil with hardsetting characteristics. The experiment followed a randomized block design with four replications and the following treatments: ALPU, i.e. ALP plus urea (U); ALPL, i.e., ALP plus leucaena (L); SSPU, i.e., SSP plus urea; SSPL, i.e., SSP plus leucaena; and BS, i.e., bare soil (without residues). To assess the residual values of the P sources, we used a sequence of crops consisting of maize, cowpea and cassava. Both ALP and SSP exhibited low P efficiency in BS. The greatest amounts of P and N uptake in the plots where P sources and leucaena residues were added, as in those covered with leucaena residue, resulted in higher productivity levels. These differences are important for the adoption of beneficial soil management practices and the use of P sources to enhance efficiency in tropical soils. The use of residues increased the P use efficiency of both P sources, as it enhanced the uptake of both N and soluble P. The replacement of SSP with ALP may be advantageous in the second year of planting with high-demand crops, but the P of the SSP retained in the minus soluble fractions may be available if the SSP is used in P-depleting crops combined with no-tillage underneath a mulch of residues. |
id |
USP-18_774a9a3a283321ac7a0cd0cee8050168 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/130948 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-18 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian peripheryP fractionshardsetting soilaluminous phosphateleguminous residuesnitrogenIn the Amazonian region, P is often a primary factor limiting sustainable agrosystems. We compared the efficiencies of local aluminous phosphate (ALP) and single superphosphate (SSP) under a cover of leguminous residues to determine the fate of P sources in an Amazonian soil with hardsetting characteristics. The experiment followed a randomized block design with four replications and the following treatments: ALPU, i.e. ALP plus urea (U); ALPL, i.e., ALP plus leucaena (L); SSPU, i.e., SSP plus urea; SSPL, i.e., SSP plus leucaena; and BS, i.e., bare soil (without residues). To assess the residual values of the P sources, we used a sequence of crops consisting of maize, cowpea and cassava. Both ALP and SSP exhibited low P efficiency in BS. The greatest amounts of P and N uptake in the plots where P sources and leucaena residues were added, as in those covered with leucaena residue, resulted in higher productivity levels. These differences are important for the adoption of beneficial soil management practices and the use of P sources to enhance efficiency in tropical soils. The use of residues increased the P use efficiency of both P sources, as it enhanced the uptake of both N and soluble P. The replacement of SSP with ALP may be advantageous in the second year of planting with high-demand crops, but the P of the SSP retained in the minus soluble fractions may be available if the SSP is used in P-depleting crops combined with no-tillage underneath a mulch of residues.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/13094810.1590/1678-992x-2016-0013Scientia Agricola; v. 74 n. 3 (2017); 242-249Scientia Agricola; Vol. 74 Núm. 3 (2017); 242-249Scientia Agricola; Vol. 74 No. 3 (2017); 242-2491678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/130948/127407Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoelho, Marta Jordana ArrudaAguiar, Alana das Chagas FerreiraSena, Virley Gardeny LimaMoura, Emanoel Gomes de2017-05-22T17:04:28Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/130948Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2017-05-22T17:04:28Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery |
title |
Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery |
spellingShingle |
Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery Coelho, Marta Jordana Arruda P fractions hardsetting soil aluminous phosphate leguminous residues nitrogen |
title_short |
Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery |
title_full |
Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery |
title_fullStr |
Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery |
title_full_unstemmed |
Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery |
title_sort |
Utilization and fate of phosphorus of different sources applied to cohesive soil of Amazonian periphery |
author |
Coelho, Marta Jordana Arruda |
author_facet |
Coelho, Marta Jordana Arruda Aguiar, Alana das Chagas Ferreira Sena, Virley Gardeny Lima Moura, Emanoel Gomes de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aguiar, Alana das Chagas Ferreira Sena, Virley Gardeny Lima Moura, Emanoel Gomes de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Coelho, Marta Jordana Arruda Aguiar, Alana das Chagas Ferreira Sena, Virley Gardeny Lima Moura, Emanoel Gomes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
P fractions hardsetting soil aluminous phosphate leguminous residues nitrogen |
topic |
P fractions hardsetting soil aluminous phosphate leguminous residues nitrogen |
description |
In the Amazonian region, P is often a primary factor limiting sustainable agrosystems. We compared the efficiencies of local aluminous phosphate (ALP) and single superphosphate (SSP) under a cover of leguminous residues to determine the fate of P sources in an Amazonian soil with hardsetting characteristics. The experiment followed a randomized block design with four replications and the following treatments: ALPU, i.e. ALP plus urea (U); ALPL, i.e., ALP plus leucaena (L); SSPU, i.e., SSP plus urea; SSPL, i.e., SSP plus leucaena; and BS, i.e., bare soil (without residues). To assess the residual values of the P sources, we used a sequence of crops consisting of maize, cowpea and cassava. Both ALP and SSP exhibited low P efficiency in BS. The greatest amounts of P and N uptake in the plots where P sources and leucaena residues were added, as in those covered with leucaena residue, resulted in higher productivity levels. These differences are important for the adoption of beneficial soil management practices and the use of P sources to enhance efficiency in tropical soils. The use of residues increased the P use efficiency of both P sources, as it enhanced the uptake of both N and soluble P. The replacement of SSP with ALP may be advantageous in the second year of planting with high-demand crops, but the P of the SSP retained in the minus soluble fractions may be available if the SSP is used in P-depleting crops combined with no-tillage underneath a mulch of residues. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/130948 10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0013 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/130948 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/130948/127407 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Agricola info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Agricola |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agricola; v. 74 n. 3 (2017); 242-249 Scientia Agricola; Vol. 74 Núm. 3 (2017); 242-249 Scientia Agricola; Vol. 74 No. 3 (2017); 242-249 1678-992X 0103-9016 reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222793243033600 |