Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2002 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162002000300012 |
Resumo: | The augmented block design is widely used in breeding programs, with non-replicated treatments generally being selection units, and replicated treatments being standard cultivars. Originally, an intrablock analysis (fixed model) was proposed. Although non-replicated treatments and/or blocks can be considered of random nature, mixed linear models could be used instead. This work evaluated such an approach, using computer simulation. Populations consisted of sets of randomly generated inbred lines. Molecular marker data were also simulated to allow the estimation of the genetic covariance matrix. Different conditions were considered, varying heritability and the coefficient b of Smith of soil heterogeneity. For each condition 100 simulations were performed, considering four linear models, varying respectively the nature of the effects of blocks and non-replicated treatments (fixed - F, or random - R): FF, FR, RF and RR. In relation to FF, the mixed models were more efficient under low to intermediate heritability and high b. Mixed models could improve inference in breeding programs using the augmented block design and the choice of the model should rely on the kind of selection. If this is truncated, the RF model should be preferred; if it is not, then the RR model would be more suitable. |
id |
USP-18_5c147ac161b3cab41d7a6dfd15866981 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-90162002000300012 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-18 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Simulation of mixed models in augmented block designaugmented designmixed modelmolecular markerThe augmented block design is widely used in breeding programs, with non-replicated treatments generally being selection units, and replicated treatments being standard cultivars. Originally, an intrablock analysis (fixed model) was proposed. Although non-replicated treatments and/or blocks can be considered of random nature, mixed linear models could be used instead. This work evaluated such an approach, using computer simulation. Populations consisted of sets of randomly generated inbred lines. Molecular marker data were also simulated to allow the estimation of the genetic covariance matrix. Different conditions were considered, varying heritability and the coefficient b of Smith of soil heterogeneity. For each condition 100 simulations were performed, considering four linear models, varying respectively the nature of the effects of blocks and non-replicated treatments (fixed - F, or random - R): FF, FR, RF and RR. In relation to FF, the mixed models were more efficient under low to intermediate heritability and high b. Mixed models could improve inference in breeding programs using the augmented block design and the choice of the model should rely on the kind of selection. If this is truncated, the RF model should be preferred; if it is not, then the RR model would be more suitable.Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"2002-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162002000300012Scientia Agricola v.59 n.3 2002reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0103-90162002000300012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Aladir HoracioBearzoti,EduardoFerreira,Daniel FurtadoSilva Filho,João Luís daeng2002-08-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-90162002000300012Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2002-08-09T00:00Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design |
title |
Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design |
spellingShingle |
Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design Santos,Aladir Horacio augmented design mixed model molecular marker |
title_short |
Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design |
title_full |
Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design |
title_fullStr |
Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design |
title_full_unstemmed |
Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design |
title_sort |
Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design |
author |
Santos,Aladir Horacio |
author_facet |
Santos,Aladir Horacio Bearzoti,Eduardo Ferreira,Daniel Furtado Silva Filho,João Luís da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bearzoti,Eduardo Ferreira,Daniel Furtado Silva Filho,João Luís da |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos,Aladir Horacio Bearzoti,Eduardo Ferreira,Daniel Furtado Silva Filho,João Luís da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
augmented design mixed model molecular marker |
topic |
augmented design mixed model molecular marker |
description |
The augmented block design is widely used in breeding programs, with non-replicated treatments generally being selection units, and replicated treatments being standard cultivars. Originally, an intrablock analysis (fixed model) was proposed. Although non-replicated treatments and/or blocks can be considered of random nature, mixed linear models could be used instead. This work evaluated such an approach, using computer simulation. Populations consisted of sets of randomly generated inbred lines. Molecular marker data were also simulated to allow the estimation of the genetic covariance matrix. Different conditions were considered, varying heritability and the coefficient b of Smith of soil heterogeneity. For each condition 100 simulations were performed, considering four linear models, varying respectively the nature of the effects of blocks and non-replicated treatments (fixed - F, or random - R): FF, FR, RF and RR. In relation to FF, the mixed models were more efficient under low to intermediate heritability and high b. Mixed models could improve inference in breeding programs using the augmented block design and the choice of the model should rely on the kind of selection. If this is truncated, the RF model should be preferred; if it is not, then the RR model would be more suitable. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162002000300012 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162002000300012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-90162002000300012 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agricola v.59 n.3 2002 reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br |
_version_ |
1748936458407772160 |