Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos,Aladir Horacio
Data de Publicação: 2002
Outros Autores: Bearzoti,Eduardo, Ferreira,Daniel Furtado, Silva Filho,João Luís da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162002000300012
Resumo: The augmented block design is widely used in breeding programs, with non-replicated treatments generally being selection units, and replicated treatments being standard cultivars. Originally, an intrablock analysis (fixed model) was proposed. Although non-replicated treatments and/or blocks can be considered of random nature, mixed linear models could be used instead. This work evaluated such an approach, using computer simulation. Populations consisted of sets of randomly generated inbred lines. Molecular marker data were also simulated to allow the estimation of the genetic covariance matrix. Different conditions were considered, varying heritability and the coefficient b of Smith of soil heterogeneity. For each condition 100 simulations were performed, considering four linear models, varying respectively the nature of the effects of blocks and non-replicated treatments (fixed - F, or random - R): FF, FR, RF and RR. In relation to FF, the mixed models were more efficient under low to intermediate heritability and high b. Mixed models could improve inference in breeding programs using the augmented block design and the choice of the model should rely on the kind of selection. If this is truncated, the RF model should be preferred; if it is not, then the RR model would be more suitable.
id USP-18_5c147ac161b3cab41d7a6dfd15866981
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-90162002000300012
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Simulation of mixed models in augmented block designaugmented designmixed modelmolecular markerThe augmented block design is widely used in breeding programs, with non-replicated treatments generally being selection units, and replicated treatments being standard cultivars. Originally, an intrablock analysis (fixed model) was proposed. Although non-replicated treatments and/or blocks can be considered of random nature, mixed linear models could be used instead. This work evaluated such an approach, using computer simulation. Populations consisted of sets of randomly generated inbred lines. Molecular marker data were also simulated to allow the estimation of the genetic covariance matrix. Different conditions were considered, varying heritability and the coefficient b of Smith of soil heterogeneity. For each condition 100 simulations were performed, considering four linear models, varying respectively the nature of the effects of blocks and non-replicated treatments (fixed - F, or random - R): FF, FR, RF and RR. In relation to FF, the mixed models were more efficient under low to intermediate heritability and high b. Mixed models could improve inference in breeding programs using the augmented block design and the choice of the model should rely on the kind of selection. If this is truncated, the RF model should be preferred; if it is not, then the RR model would be more suitable.Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"2002-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162002000300012Scientia Agricola v.59 n.3 2002reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0103-90162002000300012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Aladir HoracioBearzoti,EduardoFerreira,Daniel FurtadoSilva Filho,João Luís daeng2002-08-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-90162002000300012Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2002-08-09T00:00Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design
title Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design
spellingShingle Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design
Santos,Aladir Horacio
augmented design
mixed model
molecular marker
title_short Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design
title_full Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design
title_fullStr Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design
title_full_unstemmed Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design
title_sort Simulation of mixed models in augmented block design
author Santos,Aladir Horacio
author_facet Santos,Aladir Horacio
Bearzoti,Eduardo
Ferreira,Daniel Furtado
Silva Filho,João Luís da
author_role author
author2 Bearzoti,Eduardo
Ferreira,Daniel Furtado
Silva Filho,João Luís da
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos,Aladir Horacio
Bearzoti,Eduardo
Ferreira,Daniel Furtado
Silva Filho,João Luís da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv augmented design
mixed model
molecular marker
topic augmented design
mixed model
molecular marker
description The augmented block design is widely used in breeding programs, with non-replicated treatments generally being selection units, and replicated treatments being standard cultivars. Originally, an intrablock analysis (fixed model) was proposed. Although non-replicated treatments and/or blocks can be considered of random nature, mixed linear models could be used instead. This work evaluated such an approach, using computer simulation. Populations consisted of sets of randomly generated inbred lines. Molecular marker data were also simulated to allow the estimation of the genetic covariance matrix. Different conditions were considered, varying heritability and the coefficient b of Smith of soil heterogeneity. For each condition 100 simulations were performed, considering four linear models, varying respectively the nature of the effects of blocks and non-replicated treatments (fixed - F, or random - R): FF, FR, RF and RR. In relation to FF, the mixed models were more efficient under low to intermediate heritability and high b. Mixed models could improve inference in breeding programs using the augmented block design and the choice of the model should rely on the kind of selection. If this is truncated, the RF model should be preferred; if it is not, then the RR model would be more suitable.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162002000300012
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162002000300012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-90162002000300012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola v.59 n.3 2002
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1748936458407772160