Plant proton pumps as markers of biostimulant action

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zandonadi, Daniel Basílio
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Santos, Mirella Pupo, Caixeta, Lisanne Santos, Marinho, Eduardo Barros, Peres, Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira, Façanha, Arnoldo Rocha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/108530
Resumo: A standard protocol to evaluate the effects of biostimulants on plant physiology is still lacking. The proton pumps present in the vacuolar and plasma membranes are the primary agents responsible for the regulation of the electrochemical gradient that energizes the nutrient uptake system and acid growth mechanism of plant cells. In this study, two of these enzymes were characterized as biochemical markers of biostimulant activity. A simple and fast protocol based on the degree of root acidification using a pH sensitive dye and the Micro-Tom tomato as a plant model is proposed as an efficient methodology to prove the efficacy of biostimulants that are claimed to improve nutrient acquisition and root growth. The results agree with the data from more conventional, expensive and time-consuming proton pump assays. A direct correlation was found between plasmalemma proton-adenosine triphosphatase (H+-ATPase) activation and the amount of rhizosphere acidification observed in the bromocresol gel. Moreover, roots of the diageotropica (dgt) Micro-Tom plants, defective in auxin responses, barely acidify bromocresol purple gel even in the presence of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA, 1 μM). The biostimulant TEA (vermicompost water extract, 25 %) enhances proton extrusion by 40 % in wild type (WT) plants, but no effect was induced in dgt plants. These results reinforce the notion that the class of biostimulant known as humic substances stimulates plant proton pumps and promotes root growth by exerting an auxin-like bioactivity and establish the usefulness of an economically and technically feasible assay to certify this kind of biostimulant.
id USP-18_ea3573c99f76c52e1aea5372f2bf3ec2
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/108530
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Plant proton pumps as markers of biostimulant action A standard protocol to evaluate the effects of biostimulants on plant physiology is still lacking. The proton pumps present in the vacuolar and plasma membranes are the primary agents responsible for the regulation of the electrochemical gradient that energizes the nutrient uptake system and acid growth mechanism of plant cells. In this study, two of these enzymes were characterized as biochemical markers of biostimulant activity. A simple and fast protocol based on the degree of root acidification using a pH sensitive dye and the Micro-Tom tomato as a plant model is proposed as an efficient methodology to prove the efficacy of biostimulants that are claimed to improve nutrient acquisition and root growth. The results agree with the data from more conventional, expensive and time-consuming proton pump assays. A direct correlation was found between plasmalemma proton-adenosine triphosphatase (H+-ATPase) activation and the amount of rhizosphere acidification observed in the bromocresol gel. Moreover, roots of the diageotropica (dgt) Micro-Tom plants, defective in auxin responses, barely acidify bromocresol purple gel even in the presence of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA, 1 μM). The biostimulant TEA (vermicompost water extract, 25 %) enhances proton extrusion by 40 % in wild type (WT) plants, but no effect was induced in dgt plants. These results reinforce the notion that the class of biostimulant known as humic substances stimulates plant proton pumps and promotes root growth by exerting an auxin-like bioactivity and establish the usefulness of an economically and technically feasible assay to certify this kind of biostimulant. Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2016-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/10853010.1590/0103-9016-2015-0076Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 1 (2016); 24-28Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 1 (2016); 24-28Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 1 (2016); 24-281678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/108530/106847Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZandonadi, Daniel BasílioSantos, Mirella PupoCaixeta, Lisanne SantosMarinho, Eduardo BarrosPeres, Lázaro Eustáquio PereiraFaçanha, Arnoldo Rocha2015-12-16T11:23:23Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/108530Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2015-12-16T11:23:23Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Plant proton pumps as markers of biostimulant action
title Plant proton pumps as markers of biostimulant action
spellingShingle Plant proton pumps as markers of biostimulant action
Zandonadi, Daniel Basílio
title_short Plant proton pumps as markers of biostimulant action
title_full Plant proton pumps as markers of biostimulant action
title_fullStr Plant proton pumps as markers of biostimulant action
title_full_unstemmed Plant proton pumps as markers of biostimulant action
title_sort Plant proton pumps as markers of biostimulant action
author Zandonadi, Daniel Basílio
author_facet Zandonadi, Daniel Basílio
Santos, Mirella Pupo
Caixeta, Lisanne Santos
Marinho, Eduardo Barros
Peres, Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira
Façanha, Arnoldo Rocha
author_role author
author2 Santos, Mirella Pupo
Caixeta, Lisanne Santos
Marinho, Eduardo Barros
Peres, Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira
Façanha, Arnoldo Rocha
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zandonadi, Daniel Basílio
Santos, Mirella Pupo
Caixeta, Lisanne Santos
Marinho, Eduardo Barros
Peres, Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira
Façanha, Arnoldo Rocha
description A standard protocol to evaluate the effects of biostimulants on plant physiology is still lacking. The proton pumps present in the vacuolar and plasma membranes are the primary agents responsible for the regulation of the electrochemical gradient that energizes the nutrient uptake system and acid growth mechanism of plant cells. In this study, two of these enzymes were characterized as biochemical markers of biostimulant activity. A simple and fast protocol based on the degree of root acidification using a pH sensitive dye and the Micro-Tom tomato as a plant model is proposed as an efficient methodology to prove the efficacy of biostimulants that are claimed to improve nutrient acquisition and root growth. The results agree with the data from more conventional, expensive and time-consuming proton pump assays. A direct correlation was found between plasmalemma proton-adenosine triphosphatase (H+-ATPase) activation and the amount of rhizosphere acidification observed in the bromocresol gel. Moreover, roots of the diageotropica (dgt) Micro-Tom plants, defective in auxin responses, barely acidify bromocresol purple gel even in the presence of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA, 1 μM). The biostimulant TEA (vermicompost water extract, 25 %) enhances proton extrusion by 40 % in wild type (WT) plants, but no effect was induced in dgt plants. These results reinforce the notion that the class of biostimulant known as humic substances stimulates plant proton pumps and promotes root growth by exerting an auxin-like bioactivity and establish the usefulness of an economically and technically feasible assay to certify this kind of biostimulant.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/108530
10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0076
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/108530
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0076
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/108530/106847
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 1 (2016); 24-28
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 1 (2016); 24-28
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 1 (2016); 24-28
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222792789000192