Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardinal,Kátia Maria
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Andretta,Ines, Silva,Marcos Kipper da, Stefanello,Thais Bastos, Schroeder,Bruna, Ribeiro,Andréa Machado Leal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162021000700401
Resumo: ABSTRACT: This study was designed to simulate productive and economic losses due to the withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) from pig diets. Articles that compared diets with AGP (AGP+) or without AGP (AGP–) for pigs were collected from electronic databases and the performance results were entered in a database. A meta-analysis was performed following the sequence: graphical analysis, correlation, and variance-covariance. The performance results observed in the meta-analysis, feed cost, and AGP costs were used to build equations to estimate the economic effect of withdrawing AGP. The database comprised 81 scientific articles containing 103 experiments totalizing 42,923 pigs. Avilamycin (24.7 %) was the most frequent AGP in the database, followed by Colistin (15.4 %), Tiamulin (11.7 %), Tylosin (8.0 %), Lincomycin (9.4 %), and Bacitracin (5.4 %). Weight gain (p < 0.05) increased in AGP+ diets during post-weaning (6.5 %). However, there was no effect of AGP on weight gain of growing-finishing pigs. There was better (p < 0.05) feed conversion in pigs fed AGP+ diets in all rearing phases. Weight gain and feed conversion improved (p < 0.05) with the addition of Avilamycin, Bacitracin, and Tylosin. AGP withdrawal in the post-weaning phase increased feed costs by US$ 0.86 per animal and in growing-finishing phase the increase was US$ 3.11. Thus, pigs fed AGP+ diets have a better performance than pigs fed AGP- diets and the withdrawal of AGP increases feed costs.
id USP-18_ea78a5ceee58cc197963338514573d5a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-90162021000700401
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysisaddditivefeed conversionfeed costproductive costswineABSTRACT: This study was designed to simulate productive and economic losses due to the withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) from pig diets. Articles that compared diets with AGP (AGP+) or without AGP (AGP–) for pigs were collected from electronic databases and the performance results were entered in a database. A meta-analysis was performed following the sequence: graphical analysis, correlation, and variance-covariance. The performance results observed in the meta-analysis, feed cost, and AGP costs were used to build equations to estimate the economic effect of withdrawing AGP. The database comprised 81 scientific articles containing 103 experiments totalizing 42,923 pigs. Avilamycin (24.7 %) was the most frequent AGP in the database, followed by Colistin (15.4 %), Tiamulin (11.7 %), Tylosin (8.0 %), Lincomycin (9.4 %), and Bacitracin (5.4 %). Weight gain (p < 0.05) increased in AGP+ diets during post-weaning (6.5 %). However, there was no effect of AGP on weight gain of growing-finishing pigs. There was better (p < 0.05) feed conversion in pigs fed AGP+ diets in all rearing phases. Weight gain and feed conversion improved (p < 0.05) with the addition of Avilamycin, Bacitracin, and Tylosin. AGP withdrawal in the post-weaning phase increased feed costs by US$ 0.86 per animal and in growing-finishing phase the increase was US$ 3.11. Thus, pigs fed AGP+ diets have a better performance than pigs fed AGP- diets and the withdrawal of AGP increases feed costs.Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162021000700401Scientia Agricola v.78 suppl.1 2021reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/1678-992x-2020-0266info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardinal,Kátia MariaAndretta,InesSilva,Marcos Kipper daStefanello,Thais BastosSchroeder,BrunaRibeiro,Andréa Machado Lealeng2021-03-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-90162021000700401Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2021-03-30T00:00Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
title Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
spellingShingle Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
Cardinal,Kátia Maria
addditive
feed conversion
feed cost
productive cost
swine
title_short Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
title_full Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
title_sort Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
author Cardinal,Kátia Maria
author_facet Cardinal,Kátia Maria
Andretta,Ines
Silva,Marcos Kipper da
Stefanello,Thais Bastos
Schroeder,Bruna
Ribeiro,Andréa Machado Leal
author_role author
author2 Andretta,Ines
Silva,Marcos Kipper da
Stefanello,Thais Bastos
Schroeder,Bruna
Ribeiro,Andréa Machado Leal
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardinal,Kátia Maria
Andretta,Ines
Silva,Marcos Kipper da
Stefanello,Thais Bastos
Schroeder,Bruna
Ribeiro,Andréa Machado Leal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv addditive
feed conversion
feed cost
productive cost
swine
topic addditive
feed conversion
feed cost
productive cost
swine
description ABSTRACT: This study was designed to simulate productive and economic losses due to the withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) from pig diets. Articles that compared diets with AGP (AGP+) or without AGP (AGP–) for pigs were collected from electronic databases and the performance results were entered in a database. A meta-analysis was performed following the sequence: graphical analysis, correlation, and variance-covariance. The performance results observed in the meta-analysis, feed cost, and AGP costs were used to build equations to estimate the economic effect of withdrawing AGP. The database comprised 81 scientific articles containing 103 experiments totalizing 42,923 pigs. Avilamycin (24.7 %) was the most frequent AGP in the database, followed by Colistin (15.4 %), Tiamulin (11.7 %), Tylosin (8.0 %), Lincomycin (9.4 %), and Bacitracin (5.4 %). Weight gain (p < 0.05) increased in AGP+ diets during post-weaning (6.5 %). However, there was no effect of AGP on weight gain of growing-finishing pigs. There was better (p < 0.05) feed conversion in pigs fed AGP+ diets in all rearing phases. Weight gain and feed conversion improved (p < 0.05) with the addition of Avilamycin, Bacitracin, and Tylosin. AGP withdrawal in the post-weaning phase increased feed costs by US$ 0.86 per animal and in growing-finishing phase the increase was US$ 3.11. Thus, pigs fed AGP+ diets have a better performance than pigs fed AGP- diets and the withdrawal of AGP increases feed costs.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162021000700401
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162021000700401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992x-2020-0266
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola v.78 suppl.1 2021
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1748936465719492608