Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chammas Jr, Mario F.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Mitre, Anuar I., Arap, Marco A., Hubert, Nicholas, Hubert, Jacques
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/159499
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To analyze our experience and learning curve for robotic pyeloplasty during this robotic procedure. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients underwent 100 consecutive procedures. Cases were divided into 4 groups of 25 consecutive procedures to analyze the learning curve. RESULTS: The median anastomosis times were 50.0, 36.8, 34.2 and 29.0 minutes (p=0.137) in the sequential groups, respectively. The median operative times were 144.6, 119.2, 114.5 and 94.6 minutes, with a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (p=0.015), 1 and 3 (p=0.002), 1 and 4 (po0.001) and 2 and 4 (p=0.022). The mean hospital stay was 7.08, 4.76, 4.88 and 4.20 days, with a difference between groups 1 and 2 (po0.001), 1 and 3 (po0.001) and 1 and 4 (po0.001). Clinical and radiological improvements were observed in 98.9% of patients. One patient presented with recurrent obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a high success rate with low complication rates. A significant decrease in hospital stay and surgical time was evident after 25 cases.
id USP-19_23c29159f9bad028ecb1c3a87fbdf993
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/159499
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic eraRobotic-AssistedLaparoscopyUreteropelvic Junction ObstructionEducationLearning CurveOBJECTIVE: To analyze our experience and learning curve for robotic pyeloplasty during this robotic procedure. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients underwent 100 consecutive procedures. Cases were divided into 4 groups of 25 consecutive procedures to analyze the learning curve. RESULTS: The median anastomosis times were 50.0, 36.8, 34.2 and 29.0 minutes (p=0.137) in the sequential groups, respectively. The median operative times were 144.6, 119.2, 114.5 and 94.6 minutes, with a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (p=0.015), 1 and 3 (p=0.002), 1 and 4 (po0.001) and 2 and 4 (p=0.022). The mean hospital stay was 7.08, 4.76, 4.88 and 4.20 days, with a difference between groups 1 and 2 (po0.001), 1 and 3 (po0.001) and 1 and 4 (po0.001). Clinical and radiological improvements were observed in 98.9% of patients. One patient presented with recurrent obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a high success rate with low complication rates. A significant decrease in hospital stay and surgical time was evident after 25 cases.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2019-06-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/15949910.6061/clinics/2019/e777Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e777Clinics; v. 74 (2019); e777Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e7771980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/159499/154272https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/159499/154273Copyright (c) 2019 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChammas Jr, Mario F.Mitre, Anuar I.Arap, Marco A.Hubert, NicholasHubert, Jacques2019-06-28T18:33:05Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/159499Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2019-06-28T18:33:05Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era
title Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era
spellingShingle Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era
Chammas Jr, Mario F.
Robotic-Assisted
Laparoscopy
Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
Education
Learning Curve
title_short Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era
title_full Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era
title_fullStr Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era
title_full_unstemmed Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era
title_sort Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era
author Chammas Jr, Mario F.
author_facet Chammas Jr, Mario F.
Mitre, Anuar I.
Arap, Marco A.
Hubert, Nicholas
Hubert, Jacques
author_role author
author2 Mitre, Anuar I.
Arap, Marco A.
Hubert, Nicholas
Hubert, Jacques
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chammas Jr, Mario F.
Mitre, Anuar I.
Arap, Marco A.
Hubert, Nicholas
Hubert, Jacques
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Robotic-Assisted
Laparoscopy
Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
Education
Learning Curve
topic Robotic-Assisted
Laparoscopy
Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
Education
Learning Curve
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze our experience and learning curve for robotic pyeloplasty during this robotic procedure. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients underwent 100 consecutive procedures. Cases were divided into 4 groups of 25 consecutive procedures to analyze the learning curve. RESULTS: The median anastomosis times were 50.0, 36.8, 34.2 and 29.0 minutes (p=0.137) in the sequential groups, respectively. The median operative times were 144.6, 119.2, 114.5 and 94.6 minutes, with a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (p=0.015), 1 and 3 (p=0.002), 1 and 4 (po0.001) and 2 and 4 (p=0.022). The mean hospital stay was 7.08, 4.76, 4.88 and 4.20 days, with a difference between groups 1 and 2 (po0.001), 1 and 3 (po0.001) and 1 and 4 (po0.001). Clinical and radiological improvements were observed in 98.9% of patients. One patient presented with recurrent obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a high success rate with low complication rates. A significant decrease in hospital stay and surgical time was evident after 25 cases.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/159499
10.6061/clinics/2019/e777
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/159499
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2019/e777
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/159499/154272
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/159499/154273
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e777
Clinics; v. 74 (2019); e777
Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e777
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222764186992640