Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 47 cases

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Brito, Artur Henrique, Srougi, Miguel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17753
Resumo: PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of a sequence of 47 laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasties for the treatment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction, independently of the etiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty male and 27 female patients diagnosed with ureteropelvic junction obstruction were treated by Anderson-Hynes transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty from April 2002 to January 2006. The age of the patients ranged from four to 75 years, with a mean age of 32.3 years. The follow-up ranged between six and 30 months, with a mean follow-up time of 24 months. The outcomes were evaluated through the assessment of symptoms and imaging studies. RESULTS: In 44 (93.6%) of the 47 patients, resolution of the pain and a reduction in ureteropelvic dilation were observed. The mean operative time was 157 minutes (ranging from 90 to 270 minutes). Neither blood transfusion nor conversion to open surgery was required. The mean hospital stay was 2.2 days. The presence of crossing vessels over the ureteropelvic junction was verified in 26 patients (55%), and vessel transposition in relation to the urinary tract was performed in 25 of these cases. In one patient, the crossing vessel was mobilized out of the ureteropelvic junction with a perivascular suture to the renal capsule associated with the pyeloplasty. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of transperitoneal Anderson-Hynes laparoscopic pyeloplasty used for different causes of pyeloureteral obstruction presented a success rate similar to a previously-published open procedure, with the advantage of being less invasive. This procedure may be considered the first option for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
id USP-19_4f0e7144a129cdef7308aafa1de74783
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/17753
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 47 cases Laparoscopyureteral obstructionHydronephrosisUrinary tract anomaliesUreteropelvic junction obstruction PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of a sequence of 47 laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasties for the treatment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction, independently of the etiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty male and 27 female patients diagnosed with ureteropelvic junction obstruction were treated by Anderson-Hynes transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty from April 2002 to January 2006. The age of the patients ranged from four to 75 years, with a mean age of 32.3 years. The follow-up ranged between six and 30 months, with a mean follow-up time of 24 months. The outcomes were evaluated through the assessment of symptoms and imaging studies. RESULTS: In 44 (93.6%) of the 47 patients, resolution of the pain and a reduction in ureteropelvic dilation were observed. The mean operative time was 157 minutes (ranging from 90 to 270 minutes). Neither blood transfusion nor conversion to open surgery was required. The mean hospital stay was 2.2 days. The presence of crossing vessels over the ureteropelvic junction was verified in 26 patients (55%), and vessel transposition in relation to the urinary tract was performed in 25 of these cases. In one patient, the crossing vessel was mobilized out of the ureteropelvic junction with a perivascular suture to the renal capsule associated with the pyeloplasty. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of transperitoneal Anderson-Hynes laparoscopic pyeloplasty used for different causes of pyeloureteral obstruction presented a success rate similar to a previously-published open procedure, with the advantage of being less invasive. This procedure may be considered the first option for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1775310.1590/S1807-59322008000500011Clinics; Vol. 63 No. 5 (2008); 631-636 Clinics; v. 63 n. 5 (2008); 631-636 Clinics; Vol. 63 Núm. 5 (2008); 631-636 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17753/19818Mitre, Anuar IbrahimBrito, Artur HenriqueSrougi, Miguelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-22T18:30:43Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/17753Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-22T18:30:43Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 47 cases
title Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 47 cases
spellingShingle Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 47 cases
Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
Laparoscopy
ureteral obstruction
Hydronephrosis
Urinary tract anomalies
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction
title_short Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 47 cases
title_full Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 47 cases
title_fullStr Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 47 cases
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 47 cases
title_sort Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 47 cases
author Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
author_facet Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
Brito, Artur Henrique
Srougi, Miguel
author_role author
author2 Brito, Artur Henrique
Srougi, Miguel
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
Brito, Artur Henrique
Srougi, Miguel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Laparoscopy
ureteral obstruction
Hydronephrosis
Urinary tract anomalies
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction
topic Laparoscopy
ureteral obstruction
Hydronephrosis
Urinary tract anomalies
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of a sequence of 47 laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasties for the treatment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction, independently of the etiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty male and 27 female patients diagnosed with ureteropelvic junction obstruction were treated by Anderson-Hynes transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty from April 2002 to January 2006. The age of the patients ranged from four to 75 years, with a mean age of 32.3 years. The follow-up ranged between six and 30 months, with a mean follow-up time of 24 months. The outcomes were evaluated through the assessment of symptoms and imaging studies. RESULTS: In 44 (93.6%) of the 47 patients, resolution of the pain and a reduction in ureteropelvic dilation were observed. The mean operative time was 157 minutes (ranging from 90 to 270 minutes). Neither blood transfusion nor conversion to open surgery was required. The mean hospital stay was 2.2 days. The presence of crossing vessels over the ureteropelvic junction was verified in 26 patients (55%), and vessel transposition in relation to the urinary tract was performed in 25 of these cases. In one patient, the crossing vessel was mobilized out of the ureteropelvic junction with a perivascular suture to the renal capsule associated with the pyeloplasty. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of transperitoneal Anderson-Hynes laparoscopic pyeloplasty used for different causes of pyeloureteral obstruction presented a success rate similar to a previously-published open procedure, with the advantage of being less invasive. This procedure may be considered the first option for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17753
10.1590/S1807-59322008000500011
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17753
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322008000500011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17753/19818
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 63 No. 5 (2008); 631-636
Clinics; v. 63 n. 5 (2008); 631-636
Clinics; Vol. 63 Núm. 5 (2008); 631-636
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222753479983104