Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bali, İlhan
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Aziret, Mehmet, Sözen, Selim, Emir, Seyfi, Erdem, Hasan, Çetinkünar, Süleyman, İrkörücü, Oktay
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/101053
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is common in young men and may recur over time after surgery. We investigated whether a factor exists that can aid in the determination of the preferred technique between the early Limberg flap and Karydakis flap techniques for treating recurrent pilonidal sinus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective and randomized study enrolled 71 patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus in whom the Limberg flap or Karydakis flap techniques were applied for reconstruction after excision. Patients were divided into two groups as follows: 37 patients were treated with the Limberg flap technique and 34 patients were treated with the Karydakis flap technique. Fluid collection, wound infection, flap edema, hematoma, partial wound separation, return to daily activities, pain score, complete healing time, painless seating and patient satisfaction were compared between the groups. ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02287935. RESULTS: The development rates of total fluid collection, wound infection, flap edema, hematoma, and partial wound separation were 9.8%, 16%, 7%, 15% and 4.2%, respectively; total flap necrosis was not observed in any patient (p
id USP-19_2fd238398c4c6c6321b7336faf82c85e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/101053
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease OBJECTIVE: Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is common in young men and may recur over time after surgery. We investigated whether a factor exists that can aid in the determination of the preferred technique between the early Limberg flap and Karydakis flap techniques for treating recurrent pilonidal sinus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective and randomized study enrolled 71 patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus in whom the Limberg flap or Karydakis flap techniques were applied for reconstruction after excision. Patients were divided into two groups as follows: 37 patients were treated with the Limberg flap technique and 34 patients were treated with the Karydakis flap technique. Fluid collection, wound infection, flap edema, hematoma, partial wound separation, return to daily activities, pain score, complete healing time, painless seating and patient satisfaction were compared between the groups. ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02287935. RESULTS: The development rates of total fluid collection, wound infection, flap edema, hematoma, and partial wound separation were 9.8%, 16%, 7%, 15% and 4.2%, respectively; total flap necrosis was not observed in any patient (pHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2015-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/10105310.6061/clinics/2015(05)08Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 5 (2015); 350-355Clinics; v. 70 n. 5 (2015); 350-355Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 5 (2015); 350-3551980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/101053/99713Copyright (c) 2015 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBali, İlhan Aziret, Mehmet Sözen, Selim Emir, Seyfi Erdem, Hasan Çetinkünar, Süleyman İrkörücü, Oktay 2015-07-28T13:40:31Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/101053Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2015-07-28T13:40:31Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease
title Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease
spellingShingle Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease
Bali, İlhan
title_short Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease
title_full Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease
title_sort Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease
author Bali, İlhan
author_facet Bali, İlhan
Aziret, Mehmet
Sözen, Selim
Emir, Seyfi
Erdem, Hasan
Çetinkünar, Süleyman
İrkörücü, Oktay
author_role author
author2 Aziret, Mehmet
Sözen, Selim
Emir, Seyfi
Erdem, Hasan
Çetinkünar, Süleyman
İrkörücü, Oktay
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bali, İlhan
Aziret, Mehmet
Sözen, Selim
Emir, Seyfi
Erdem, Hasan
Çetinkünar, Süleyman
İrkörücü, Oktay
description OBJECTIVE: Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is common in young men and may recur over time after surgery. We investigated whether a factor exists that can aid in the determination of the preferred technique between the early Limberg flap and Karydakis flap techniques for treating recurrent pilonidal sinus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective and randomized study enrolled 71 patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus in whom the Limberg flap or Karydakis flap techniques were applied for reconstruction after excision. Patients were divided into two groups as follows: 37 patients were treated with the Limberg flap technique and 34 patients were treated with the Karydakis flap technique. Fluid collection, wound infection, flap edema, hematoma, partial wound separation, return to daily activities, pain score, complete healing time, painless seating and patient satisfaction were compared between the groups. ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02287935. RESULTS: The development rates of total fluid collection, wound infection, flap edema, hematoma, and partial wound separation were 9.8%, 16%, 7%, 15% and 4.2%, respectively; total flap necrosis was not observed in any patient (p
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/101053
10.6061/clinics/2015(05)08
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/101053
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2015(05)08
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/101053/99713
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 5 (2015); 350-355
Clinics; v. 70 n. 5 (2015); 350-355
Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 5 (2015); 350-355
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222761767927808