Does videothoracoscopy improve clinical outcomes when implemented as part of a pleural empyema treatment algorithm?

• Autor(a) principal: Terra, Ricardo Mingarini
• Data de Publicação: 2012
• Outros Autores: Waisberg, Daniel Reis, Almeida, José Luiz Jesus de, Devido, Marcela Santana, Pêgo-Fernandes, Paulo Manuel, Jatene, Fabio Biscegli
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Clinics
• Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/40007
• topic: Empyema; Pleural Diseases; Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery; Outcome Assessment; Thoracic Surgery

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate whether the inclusion of videothoracoscopy in a pleural empyema treatment algorithm would change the clinical outcome of such patients. METHODS: This study performed quality-improvement research. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent pleural decortication for pleural empyema at our institution from 2002 to 2008. With the old algorithm (January 2002 to September 2005), open decortication was the procedure of choice, and videothoracoscopy was only performed in certain sporadic mid-stage cases. With the new algorithm (October 2005 to December 2008), videothoracoscopy became the first-line treatment option, whereas open decortication was only performed in patients with a thick pleural peel (>2 cm) observed by chest scan. The patients were divided into an old algorithm (n = 93) and new algorithm (n = 113) group and compared. The main outcome variables assessed included treatment failure (pleural space reintervention or death up to 60 days after medical discharge) and the occurrence of complications. RESULTS: Videothoracoscopy and open decortication were performed in 13 and 80 patients from the old algorithm group and in 81 and 32 patients from the new algorithm group, respectively (p