Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191926 |
Resumo: | Our systematic review evaluates surgically relevant information about corona mortis (CM), such as anatomical structure, size, laterality, incidence, and anthropometric correlations. This study aimed to provide data about anastomosis in an attempt to avoid iatrogenic damage during surgery. Articles were searched online using the descriptor ‘‘Corona Mortis’’ in PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Sau´ de (BVS) (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Sau´ de [LILACS], MEDLINE, indice bibliografico espan˜ ol en ciencias de la salud [IBECS]), and SciELO database. The time range was set between 1995 and 2020. The articles were selected according to their titles and later the abstracts’ relation to our research purpose. All the selected articles were read entirely. A manual search based of the references cited in these articles was also conducted to identify other articles or books of interest. Forty references fulfilled the criteria for this review. The mean incidence of CM was 63% (the majority venous) among 3,107 hemipelvises. The incidence of bilateral CM was lower than that of unilateral variations based on the analysis of 831 pelvises. The mean caliber of the anastomosis was 2.8 mm among 1,608 hemipelvises. There is no consensus concerning the anthropometric influences in CM. Finally, we concluded that CM is not an unusual anatomical variation and that we must not underestimate the risk of encountering the anastomosis during surgery. Anatomical knowledge of CM is, therefore, essential in preventing accidents for surgeons who approach the inguinal and retropubic regions. |
id |
USP-19_4237405e4c3bbc495915b822251cb0c8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/191926 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of LiteratureCorona MortisSurgeryAnatomicalVariationVascularizationPelvisOur systematic review evaluates surgically relevant information about corona mortis (CM), such as anatomical structure, size, laterality, incidence, and anthropometric correlations. This study aimed to provide data about anastomosis in an attempt to avoid iatrogenic damage during surgery. Articles were searched online using the descriptor ‘‘Corona Mortis’’ in PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Sau´ de (BVS) (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Sau´ de [LILACS], MEDLINE, indice bibliografico espan˜ ol en ciencias de la salud [IBECS]), and SciELO database. The time range was set between 1995 and 2020. The articles were selected according to their titles and later the abstracts’ relation to our research purpose. All the selected articles were read entirely. A manual search based of the references cited in these articles was also conducted to identify other articles or books of interest. Forty references fulfilled the criteria for this review. The mean incidence of CM was 63% (the majority venous) among 3,107 hemipelvises. The incidence of bilateral CM was lower than that of unilateral variations based on the analysis of 831 pelvises. The mean caliber of the anastomosis was 2.8 mm among 1,608 hemipelvises. There is no consensus concerning the anthropometric influences in CM. Finally, we concluded that CM is not an unusual anatomical variation and that we must not underestimate the risk of encountering the anastomosis during surgery. Anatomical knowledge of CM is, therefore, essential in preventing accidents for surgeons who approach the inguinal and retropubic regions.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2021-10-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19192610.6061/clinics/2021/e2182Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2182Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2182Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e21821980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191926/176901Copyright (c) 2021 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardoso, Giovana Irikura Chinelatto, Lucas Albuquerque Hojaij, Flavio Akamatsu, Flávia Emi Jacomo, Alfredo Luiz 2023-07-06T13:04:09Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/191926Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-07-06T13:04:09Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature |
title |
Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature |
spellingShingle |
Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature Cardoso, Giovana Irikura Corona Mortis Surgery Anatomical Variation Vascularization Pelvis |
title_short |
Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature |
title_full |
Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature |
title_fullStr |
Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature |
title_sort |
Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature |
author |
Cardoso, Giovana Irikura |
author_facet |
Cardoso, Giovana Irikura Chinelatto, Lucas Albuquerque Hojaij, Flavio Akamatsu, Flávia Emi Jacomo, Alfredo Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Chinelatto, Lucas Albuquerque Hojaij, Flavio Akamatsu, Flávia Emi Jacomo, Alfredo Luiz |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cardoso, Giovana Irikura Chinelatto, Lucas Albuquerque Hojaij, Flavio Akamatsu, Flávia Emi Jacomo, Alfredo Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corona Mortis Surgery Anatomical Variation Vascularization Pelvis |
topic |
Corona Mortis Surgery Anatomical Variation Vascularization Pelvis |
description |
Our systematic review evaluates surgically relevant information about corona mortis (CM), such as anatomical structure, size, laterality, incidence, and anthropometric correlations. This study aimed to provide data about anastomosis in an attempt to avoid iatrogenic damage during surgery. Articles were searched online using the descriptor ‘‘Corona Mortis’’ in PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Sau´ de (BVS) (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Sau´ de [LILACS], MEDLINE, indice bibliografico espan˜ ol en ciencias de la salud [IBECS]), and SciELO database. The time range was set between 1995 and 2020. The articles were selected according to their titles and later the abstracts’ relation to our research purpose. All the selected articles were read entirely. A manual search based of the references cited in these articles was also conducted to identify other articles or books of interest. Forty references fulfilled the criteria for this review. The mean incidence of CM was 63% (the majority venous) among 3,107 hemipelvises. The incidence of bilateral CM was lower than that of unilateral variations based on the analysis of 831 pelvises. The mean caliber of the anastomosis was 2.8 mm among 1,608 hemipelvises. There is no consensus concerning the anthropometric influences in CM. Finally, we concluded that CM is not an unusual anatomical variation and that we must not underestimate the risk of encountering the anastomosis during surgery. Anatomical knowledge of CM is, therefore, essential in preventing accidents for surgeons who approach the inguinal and retropubic regions. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191926 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2182 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191926 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2021/e2182 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191926/176901 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2182 Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2182 Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2182 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222765663387648 |