CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions: defining the best needle option for a specific diagnosis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guimarães, Marcos Duarte
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Marchiori, Edson, Hochhegger, Bruno, Chojniak, Rubens, Gross, Jefferson Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/83740
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of fine and cutting needles in computed tomography guided-biopsy of lung lesions suspicious for malignancy and to determine which technique is the best option for a specific diagnosis. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed the data from 362 (71.6%) patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy and from 97 (19.7%) patients who underwent cutting-needle biopsy between January 2006 and December 2011. The data concerning demographic and lesion characteristics, procedures, biopsy sample adequacy, specific diagnoses, and complications were collected. The success and complication rates of both biopsy techniques were calculated. RESULTS: Cutting-needle biopsy yielded significantly higher percentages of adequate biopsy samples and specific diagnoses than did fine-needle aspiration biopsy (p
id USP-19_46bc90fda588733d4529bf01be73ff76
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/83740
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions: defining the best needle option for a specific diagnosis OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of fine and cutting needles in computed tomography guided-biopsy of lung lesions suspicious for malignancy and to determine which technique is the best option for a specific diagnosis. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed the data from 362 (71.6%) patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy and from 97 (19.7%) patients who underwent cutting-needle biopsy between January 2006 and December 2011. The data concerning demographic and lesion characteristics, procedures, biopsy sample adequacy, specific diagnoses, and complications were collected. The success and complication rates of both biopsy techniques were calculated. RESULTS: Cutting-needle biopsy yielded significantly higher percentages of adequate biopsy samples and specific diagnoses than did fine-needle aspiration biopsy (pHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/8374010.6061/clinics/2014(05)07Clinics; Vol. 69 No. 5 (2014); 335-340Clinics; v. 69 n. 5 (2014); 335-340Clinics; Vol. 69 Núm. 5 (2014); 335-3401980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/83740/86644Guimarães, Marcos Duarte Marchiori, Edson Hochhegger, Bruno Chojniak, Rubens Gross, Jefferson Luiz info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-08-12T22:24:24Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/83740Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2014-08-12T22:24:24Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions: defining the best needle option for a specific diagnosis
title CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions: defining the best needle option for a specific diagnosis
spellingShingle CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions: defining the best needle option for a specific diagnosis
Guimarães, Marcos Duarte
title_short CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions: defining the best needle option for a specific diagnosis
title_full CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions: defining the best needle option for a specific diagnosis
title_fullStr CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions: defining the best needle option for a specific diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions: defining the best needle option for a specific diagnosis
title_sort CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions: defining the best needle option for a specific diagnosis
author Guimarães, Marcos Duarte
author_facet Guimarães, Marcos Duarte
Marchiori, Edson
Hochhegger, Bruno
Chojniak, Rubens
Gross, Jefferson Luiz
author_role author
author2 Marchiori, Edson
Hochhegger, Bruno
Chojniak, Rubens
Gross, Jefferson Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guimarães, Marcos Duarte
Marchiori, Edson
Hochhegger, Bruno
Chojniak, Rubens
Gross, Jefferson Luiz
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of fine and cutting needles in computed tomography guided-biopsy of lung lesions suspicious for malignancy and to determine which technique is the best option for a specific diagnosis. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed the data from 362 (71.6%) patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy and from 97 (19.7%) patients who underwent cutting-needle biopsy between January 2006 and December 2011. The data concerning demographic and lesion characteristics, procedures, biopsy sample adequacy, specific diagnoses, and complications were collected. The success and complication rates of both biopsy techniques were calculated. RESULTS: Cutting-needle biopsy yielded significantly higher percentages of adequate biopsy samples and specific diagnoses than did fine-needle aspiration biopsy (p
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/83740
10.6061/clinics/2014(05)07
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/83740
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2014(05)07
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/83740/86644
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 69 No. 5 (2014); 335-340
Clinics; v. 69 n. 5 (2014); 335-340
Clinics; Vol. 69 Núm. 5 (2014); 335-340
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222761189113856