Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Turkay, Cansel
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Kasapoglu, Benan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18411
Resumo: The inflammatory bowel diseases, consisting of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis, are distinguished by idiopathic and chronic inflammation of the digestive tract. The distinction between inflammatory bowel diseases and functional bowel disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome, can be complex because they often present with similar symptoms. Rapid and inexpensive noninvasive tests that are sensitive, specific and simple are needed to prevent patient discomfort, delay in diagnosis, and unnecessary costs. None of the current commercially available serological biomarker tests can be used as a stand-alone diagnostic in clinics. Instead, these are used as an adjunct to endoscopy in diagnosis and prognosis of the disease.Along these lines,, fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin tests seem to be one step further from other tests with larger number of studies, higher sensitivity and specificity and wider availability.
id USP-19_48769cc006deffa0c9380445cbe95a06
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/18411
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update Inflammatory bowel diseaseDiagnosisSerologyFecal markers The inflammatory bowel diseases, consisting of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis, are distinguished by idiopathic and chronic inflammation of the digestive tract. The distinction between inflammatory bowel diseases and functional bowel disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome, can be complex because they often present with similar symptoms. Rapid and inexpensive noninvasive tests that are sensitive, specific and simple are needed to prevent patient discomfort, delay in diagnosis, and unnecessary costs. None of the current commercially available serological biomarker tests can be used as a stand-alone diagnostic in clinics. Instead, these are used as an adjunct to endoscopy in diagnosis and prognosis of the disease.Along these lines,, fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin tests seem to be one step further from other tests with larger number of studies, higher sensitivity and specificity and wider availability. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1841110.1590/S1807-59322010000200015Clinics; Vol. 65 No. 2 (2010); 221-231 Clinics; v. 65 n. 2 (2010); 221-231 Clinics; Vol. 65 Núm. 2 (2010); 221-231 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18411/20474Turkay, CanselKasapoglu, Benaninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-23T11:21:16Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/18411Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-23T11:21:16Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update
title Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update
spellingShingle Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update
Turkay, Cansel
Inflammatory bowel disease
Diagnosis
Serology
Fecal markers
title_short Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update
title_full Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update
title_fullStr Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update
title_sort Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update
author Turkay, Cansel
author_facet Turkay, Cansel
Kasapoglu, Benan
author_role author
author2 Kasapoglu, Benan
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Turkay, Cansel
Kasapoglu, Benan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Inflammatory bowel disease
Diagnosis
Serology
Fecal markers
topic Inflammatory bowel disease
Diagnosis
Serology
Fecal markers
description The inflammatory bowel diseases, consisting of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis, are distinguished by idiopathic and chronic inflammation of the digestive tract. The distinction between inflammatory bowel diseases and functional bowel disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome, can be complex because they often present with similar symptoms. Rapid and inexpensive noninvasive tests that are sensitive, specific and simple are needed to prevent patient discomfort, delay in diagnosis, and unnecessary costs. None of the current commercially available serological biomarker tests can be used as a stand-alone diagnostic in clinics. Instead, these are used as an adjunct to endoscopy in diagnosis and prognosis of the disease.Along these lines,, fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin tests seem to be one step further from other tests with larger number of studies, higher sensitivity and specificity and wider availability.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18411
10.1590/S1807-59322010000200015
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18411
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322010000200015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18411/20474
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 65 No. 2 (2010); 221-231
Clinics; v. 65 n. 2 (2010); 221-231
Clinics; Vol. 65 Núm. 2 (2010); 221-231
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222755286679552