Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17995 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: We developed a prosthesis for open pleurostomy cases where pulmonary decortication is not indicated, or where post-pneumonectomy space infection occurs. The open pleural window procedure not only creates a large hole in the chest wall that is shocking to patients, also results in a permanent deformation of the thorax. prosthesis for open pleurostomy is a self-retained silicone tube that requires the removal of 3 cm of one rib for insertion, and acts as a mature conventional open pleural window. Herein, we report our 13-year experience with this device in the management of different kinds of pleural empyema. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with chronic empyema were treated. The etiology of empyema was diverse: pneumonia, 20; lung resections, 12 (pneumonectomies, 7; lobectomies, 4; non-anatomical, 1); mixed-tuberculous, 6; and mixed-malignant pleural effusion, 6. After debridment of both pleural surfaces, the prosthesis for open pleurostomy was inserted and attached to a small recipient plastic bag. RESULTS: Infection control was achieved in 20/20 (100%) of the parapneumonic empyemas, in 3/4 (75%) of post-lobectomies, in 6/7 (85%) of post-pneumectomies, in 6/6 (100%) of mixed-tuberculous cases, and in 4/6 (83%) of mixed-malignant cases. Lung re-expansion was also successful in 93%, 75%, 33%, and 40% of the groups, respectively CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis for open pleurostomy insertion is a minimally invasive procedure that can be as effective as conventional open pleural window for management of chronic empyemas. Thus, we propose that the use of prosthesis for open pleurostomy should replace the conventional method. |
id |
USP-19_510495419420c41907d5a003c3094c53 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/17995 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas Open Pleural WindowPleurostomyEmpyemaPleural EffusionPulmonary Decortication OBJECTIVES: We developed a prosthesis for open pleurostomy cases where pulmonary decortication is not indicated, or where post-pneumonectomy space infection occurs. The open pleural window procedure not only creates a large hole in the chest wall that is shocking to patients, also results in a permanent deformation of the thorax. prosthesis for open pleurostomy is a self-retained silicone tube that requires the removal of 3 cm of one rib for insertion, and acts as a mature conventional open pleural window. Herein, we report our 13-year experience with this device in the management of different kinds of pleural empyema. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with chronic empyema were treated. The etiology of empyema was diverse: pneumonia, 20; lung resections, 12 (pneumonectomies, 7; lobectomies, 4; non-anatomical, 1); mixed-tuberculous, 6; and mixed-malignant pleural effusion, 6. After debridment of both pleural surfaces, the prosthesis for open pleurostomy was inserted and attached to a small recipient plastic bag. RESULTS: Infection control was achieved in 20/20 (100%) of the parapneumonic empyemas, in 3/4 (75%) of post-lobectomies, in 6/7 (85%) of post-pneumectomies, in 6/6 (100%) of mixed-tuberculous cases, and in 4/6 (83%) of mixed-malignant cases. Lung re-expansion was also successful in 93%, 75%, 33%, and 40% of the groups, respectively CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis for open pleurostomy insertion is a minimally invasive procedure that can be as effective as conventional open pleural window for management of chronic empyemas. Thus, we propose that the use of prosthesis for open pleurostomy should replace the conventional method. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2009-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1799510.1590/S1807-59322009000300010Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 3 (2009); 203-208 Clinics; v. 64 n. 3 (2009); 203-208 Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 3 (2009); 203-208 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17995/20060Filomeno, Luiz Tarcísio BritoCampos, José Ribas Milanez deMachuca, Tiago NoguchiNeves-Pereira, João Carlos dasTerra, Ricardo Mingariniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-22T18:50:15Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/17995Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-22T18:50:15Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas |
title |
Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas |
spellingShingle |
Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas Filomeno, Luiz Tarcísio Brito Open Pleural Window Pleurostomy Empyema Pleural Effusion Pulmonary Decortication |
title_short |
Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas |
title_full |
Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas |
title_fullStr |
Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas |
title_sort |
Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas |
author |
Filomeno, Luiz Tarcísio Brito |
author_facet |
Filomeno, Luiz Tarcísio Brito Campos, José Ribas Milanez de Machuca, Tiago Noguchi Neves-Pereira, João Carlos das Terra, Ricardo Mingarini |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campos, José Ribas Milanez de Machuca, Tiago Noguchi Neves-Pereira, João Carlos das Terra, Ricardo Mingarini |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Filomeno, Luiz Tarcísio Brito Campos, José Ribas Milanez de Machuca, Tiago Noguchi Neves-Pereira, João Carlos das Terra, Ricardo Mingarini |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Open Pleural Window Pleurostomy Empyema Pleural Effusion Pulmonary Decortication |
topic |
Open Pleural Window Pleurostomy Empyema Pleural Effusion Pulmonary Decortication |
description |
OBJECTIVES: We developed a prosthesis for open pleurostomy cases where pulmonary decortication is not indicated, or where post-pneumonectomy space infection occurs. The open pleural window procedure not only creates a large hole in the chest wall that is shocking to patients, also results in a permanent deformation of the thorax. prosthesis for open pleurostomy is a self-retained silicone tube that requires the removal of 3 cm of one rib for insertion, and acts as a mature conventional open pleural window. Herein, we report our 13-year experience with this device in the management of different kinds of pleural empyema. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with chronic empyema were treated. The etiology of empyema was diverse: pneumonia, 20; lung resections, 12 (pneumonectomies, 7; lobectomies, 4; non-anatomical, 1); mixed-tuberculous, 6; and mixed-malignant pleural effusion, 6. After debridment of both pleural surfaces, the prosthesis for open pleurostomy was inserted and attached to a small recipient plastic bag. RESULTS: Infection control was achieved in 20/20 (100%) of the parapneumonic empyemas, in 3/4 (75%) of post-lobectomies, in 6/7 (85%) of post-pneumectomies, in 6/6 (100%) of mixed-tuberculous cases, and in 4/6 (83%) of mixed-malignant cases. Lung re-expansion was also successful in 93%, 75%, 33%, and 40% of the groups, respectively CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis for open pleurostomy insertion is a minimally invasive procedure that can be as effective as conventional open pleural window for management of chronic empyemas. Thus, we propose that the use of prosthesis for open pleurostomy should replace the conventional method. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17995 10.1590/S1807-59322009000300010 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17995 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1807-59322009000300010 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17995/20060 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 3 (2009); 203-208 Clinics; v. 64 n. 3 (2009); 203-208 Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 3 (2009); 203-208 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222754431041536 |