Medical errors, medical negligence and defensive medicine: A narrative review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213601 |
Resumo: | Error in medicine and medical liability has a long history dating back to Antiquity. During the 19th Century, most lawsuits related to errors in treating surgical problems were settled. However, in the first half of the 20th Century, lawsuits claimed that mistakes were related to the doctor's action: the doctor made something wrong (errors of commission). In Brazil, medical error is defined as inappropriate conduct, including negligence and recklessness, that causes harm to the patient. The physician's fear of being suited is the reason for some practice named defensive Medicine (D.M.), defined as ordering unnecessary tests and procedures or avoiding treatments for patients considered at high-risk. Thus, this narrative review aims to analyze and describe the relationship between medical errors, medical negligence, and the practice of D.M. So, the authors propose procedures and attitudes to avoid medical errors and the approach of D.M.: a national focus to create leadership and research tools to enhance the knowledge base about patient safety; a reporting system that would help to identify and learn from errors; the use of a computer-based protocol reminder; some technological devices to help the medical practice (electronic prescribing and information technology systems); creating risk management programs in hospitals. Therefore, the authors conclude that the most critical attitude to avoid medical liability is a good and ethical medical practice with the proper use of technology, based on knowledge of scientific evidence and ethical principles of medicine - for the benefit of patients. |
id |
USP-19_548a1deb82205435098018b86088d28a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/213601 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Medical errors, medical negligence and defensive medicine: A narrative reviewMedical errorsMedical liabilityNegligenceDefensive medicineError in medicine and medical liability has a long history dating back to Antiquity. During the 19th Century, most lawsuits related to errors in treating surgical problems were settled. However, in the first half of the 20th Century, lawsuits claimed that mistakes were related to the doctor's action: the doctor made something wrong (errors of commission). In Brazil, medical error is defined as inappropriate conduct, including negligence and recklessness, that causes harm to the patient. The physician's fear of being suited is the reason for some practice named defensive Medicine (D.M.), defined as ordering unnecessary tests and procedures or avoiding treatments for patients considered at high-risk. Thus, this narrative review aims to analyze and describe the relationship between medical errors, medical negligence, and the practice of D.M. So, the authors propose procedures and attitudes to avoid medical errors and the approach of D.M.: a national focus to create leadership and research tools to enhance the knowledge base about patient safety; a reporting system that would help to identify and learn from errors; the use of a computer-based protocol reminder; some technological devices to help the medical practice (electronic prescribing and information technology systems); creating risk management programs in hospitals. Therefore, the authors conclude that the most critical attitude to avoid medical liability is a good and ethical medical practice with the proper use of technology, based on knowledge of scientific evidence and ethical principles of medicine - for the benefit of patients.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2022-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/21360110.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100053Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100053Clinics; v. 77 (2022); 100053Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 1000531980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213601/195688Copyright (c) 2023 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiziara, Ivan DiebMiziara, Carmen Silvia Molleis Galego2023-07-06T13:04:54Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/213601Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-07-06T13:04:54Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Medical errors, medical negligence and defensive medicine: A narrative review |
title |
Medical errors, medical negligence and defensive medicine: A narrative review |
spellingShingle |
Medical errors, medical negligence and defensive medicine: A narrative review Miziara, Ivan Dieb Medical errors Medical liability Negligence Defensive medicine |
title_short |
Medical errors, medical negligence and defensive medicine: A narrative review |
title_full |
Medical errors, medical negligence and defensive medicine: A narrative review |
title_fullStr |
Medical errors, medical negligence and defensive medicine: A narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Medical errors, medical negligence and defensive medicine: A narrative review |
title_sort |
Medical errors, medical negligence and defensive medicine: A narrative review |
author |
Miziara, Ivan Dieb |
author_facet |
Miziara, Ivan Dieb Miziara, Carmen Silvia Molleis Galego |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Miziara, Carmen Silvia Molleis Galego |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Miziara, Ivan Dieb Miziara, Carmen Silvia Molleis Galego |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Medical errors Medical liability Negligence Defensive medicine |
topic |
Medical errors Medical liability Negligence Defensive medicine |
description |
Error in medicine and medical liability has a long history dating back to Antiquity. During the 19th Century, most lawsuits related to errors in treating surgical problems were settled. However, in the first half of the 20th Century, lawsuits claimed that mistakes were related to the doctor's action: the doctor made something wrong (errors of commission). In Brazil, medical error is defined as inappropriate conduct, including negligence and recklessness, that causes harm to the patient. The physician's fear of being suited is the reason for some practice named defensive Medicine (D.M.), defined as ordering unnecessary tests and procedures or avoiding treatments for patients considered at high-risk. Thus, this narrative review aims to analyze and describe the relationship between medical errors, medical negligence, and the practice of D.M. So, the authors propose procedures and attitudes to avoid medical errors and the approach of D.M.: a national focus to create leadership and research tools to enhance the knowledge base about patient safety; a reporting system that would help to identify and learn from errors; the use of a computer-based protocol reminder; some technological devices to help the medical practice (electronic prescribing and information technology systems); creating risk management programs in hospitals. Therefore, the authors conclude that the most critical attitude to avoid medical liability is a good and ethical medical practice with the proper use of technology, based on knowledge of scientific evidence and ethical principles of medicine - for the benefit of patients. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213601 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100053 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213601 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100053 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213601/195688 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100053 Clinics; v. 77 (2022); 100053 Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100053 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222767041216512 |