Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in multivisceral en bloc resection for colorectal cancer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/133334 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the clinical and pathological factors associated with perioperative morbidity, mortality and oncological outcomes after multivisceral en bloc resection in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between January 2009 and February 2014, 105 patients with primary colorectal cancer selected for multivisceral resection were identified from a prospective database. Clinical and pathological factors, perioperative morbidity and mortality and outcomes were obtained from medical records. Estimated local recurrence and overall survival were compared using the log-rank method, and Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independence of the studied parameters. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02859155. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 60 (range 23-86) years, 66.7% were female, 80% of tumors were located in the rectum, 11.4% had stage-IV disease, and 54.3% received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The organs most frequently resected were ovaries and annexes (37%). Additionally, 30.5% of patients received abdominoperineal resection. Invasion of other organs was confirmed histologically in 53.5% of patients, and R0 resection was obtained in 72% of patients. The overall morbidity rate of patients in this study was 37.1%. Ureter resection and intraoperative blood transfusion were independently associated with an increased number of complications. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.9%. After 27 (range 5-57) months of follow-up, the mortality and local recurrence rates were 23% and 15%, respectively. Positive margins were associated with a higher recurrence rate. Positive margins, lymph node involvement, stage III/IV disease, and stage IV disease alone were associated with lower overall survival rates. On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with reduced survival was lymph node involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Multivisceral en bloc resection for primary colorectal cancer can be performed with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality and may lead to favorable oncological outcomes. |
id |
USP-19_6e59c33de24f2c58b30928c628971286 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/133334 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in multivisceral en bloc resection for colorectal cancerColorectal CancerSurvivalRecurrenceOBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the clinical and pathological factors associated with perioperative morbidity, mortality and oncological outcomes after multivisceral en bloc resection in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between January 2009 and February 2014, 105 patients with primary colorectal cancer selected for multivisceral resection were identified from a prospective database. Clinical and pathological factors, perioperative morbidity and mortality and outcomes were obtained from medical records. Estimated local recurrence and overall survival were compared using the log-rank method, and Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independence of the studied parameters. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02859155. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 60 (range 23-86) years, 66.7% were female, 80% of tumors were located in the rectum, 11.4% had stage-IV disease, and 54.3% received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The organs most frequently resected were ovaries and annexes (37%). Additionally, 30.5% of patients received abdominoperineal resection. Invasion of other organs was confirmed histologically in 53.5% of patients, and R0 resection was obtained in 72% of patients. The overall morbidity rate of patients in this study was 37.1%. Ureter resection and intraoperative blood transfusion were independently associated with an increased number of complications. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.9%. After 27 (range 5-57) months of follow-up, the mortality and local recurrence rates were 23% and 15%, respectively. Positive margins were associated with a higher recurrence rate. Positive margins, lymph node involvement, stage III/IV disease, and stage IV disease alone were associated with lower overall survival rates. On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with reduced survival was lymph node involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Multivisceral en bloc resection for primary colorectal cancer can be performed with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality and may lead to favorable oncological outcomes.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2017-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/13333410.6061/clinics/2017(05)01Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 5 (2017); 258-264Clinics; v. 72 n. 5 (2017); 258-264Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 5 (2017); 258-2641980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/133334/129400Copyright (c) 2017 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNahas, Caio Sergio RizkallahNahas, Sergio CarlosRibeiro-Junior, UlyssesBustamante-Lopez, LeonardoMarques, Carlos Frederico SparapanPinto, Rodrigo AmbarImperiale, Antonio RoccoCotti, Guilherme CutaitNahas, William CarlosChade, Daher CezarPiato, Dariane SampaioBusnardo, FabioCecconello, Ivan2017-06-02T13:42:08Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/133334Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2017-06-02T13:42:08Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in multivisceral en bloc resection for colorectal cancer |
title |
Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in multivisceral en bloc resection for colorectal cancer |
spellingShingle |
Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in multivisceral en bloc resection for colorectal cancer Nahas, Caio Sergio Rizkallah Colorectal Cancer Survival Recurrence |
title_short |
Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in multivisceral en bloc resection for colorectal cancer |
title_full |
Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in multivisceral en bloc resection for colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr |
Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in multivisceral en bloc resection for colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in multivisceral en bloc resection for colorectal cancer |
title_sort |
Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in multivisceral en bloc resection for colorectal cancer |
author |
Nahas, Caio Sergio Rizkallah |
author_facet |
Nahas, Caio Sergio Rizkallah Nahas, Sergio Carlos Ribeiro-Junior, Ulysses Bustamante-Lopez, Leonardo Marques, Carlos Frederico Sparapan Pinto, Rodrigo Ambar Imperiale, Antonio Rocco Cotti, Guilherme Cutait Nahas, William Carlos Chade, Daher Cezar Piato, Dariane Sampaio Busnardo, Fabio Cecconello, Ivan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nahas, Sergio Carlos Ribeiro-Junior, Ulysses Bustamante-Lopez, Leonardo Marques, Carlos Frederico Sparapan Pinto, Rodrigo Ambar Imperiale, Antonio Rocco Cotti, Guilherme Cutait Nahas, William Carlos Chade, Daher Cezar Piato, Dariane Sampaio Busnardo, Fabio Cecconello, Ivan |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nahas, Caio Sergio Rizkallah Nahas, Sergio Carlos Ribeiro-Junior, Ulysses Bustamante-Lopez, Leonardo Marques, Carlos Frederico Sparapan Pinto, Rodrigo Ambar Imperiale, Antonio Rocco Cotti, Guilherme Cutait Nahas, William Carlos Chade, Daher Cezar Piato, Dariane Sampaio Busnardo, Fabio Cecconello, Ivan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Colorectal Cancer Survival Recurrence |
topic |
Colorectal Cancer Survival Recurrence |
description |
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the clinical and pathological factors associated with perioperative morbidity, mortality and oncological outcomes after multivisceral en bloc resection in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between January 2009 and February 2014, 105 patients with primary colorectal cancer selected for multivisceral resection were identified from a prospective database. Clinical and pathological factors, perioperative morbidity and mortality and outcomes were obtained from medical records. Estimated local recurrence and overall survival were compared using the log-rank method, and Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independence of the studied parameters. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02859155. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 60 (range 23-86) years, 66.7% were female, 80% of tumors were located in the rectum, 11.4% had stage-IV disease, and 54.3% received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The organs most frequently resected were ovaries and annexes (37%). Additionally, 30.5% of patients received abdominoperineal resection. Invasion of other organs was confirmed histologically in 53.5% of patients, and R0 resection was obtained in 72% of patients. The overall morbidity rate of patients in this study was 37.1%. Ureter resection and intraoperative blood transfusion were independently associated with an increased number of complications. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.9%. After 27 (range 5-57) months of follow-up, the mortality and local recurrence rates were 23% and 15%, respectively. Positive margins were associated with a higher recurrence rate. Positive margins, lymph node involvement, stage III/IV disease, and stage IV disease alone were associated with lower overall survival rates. On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with reduced survival was lymph node involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Multivisceral en bloc resection for primary colorectal cancer can be performed with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality and may lead to favorable oncological outcomes. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/133334 10.6061/clinics/2017(05)01 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/133334 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2017(05)01 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/133334/129400 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 5 (2017); 258-264 Clinics; v. 72 n. 5 (2017); 258-264 Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 5 (2017); 258-264 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1824324353531052032 |