The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213609 |
Resumo: | The impact of Multivisceral Liver Resection (MLR) on the outcome of patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis (CRLM) is unclear. The present systematic review aimed to compare patients with CRLM who underwent MLR versus standard hepatectomy regarding short- and long-term outcomes. MLR is a feasible procedure but has a higher risk of major complications. MLR did not negatively affect long-term survival, suggesting that an extended resection is an option for potentially curative treatment for selected patients with CRLM. |
id |
USP-19_8edb687f357bf10c77ffb8e2ae061798 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/213609 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysisColorectal neoplasmsLiverHepatectomyMargins of excisionSurvival analysisMeta-analysisThe impact of Multivisceral Liver Resection (MLR) on the outcome of patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis (CRLM) is unclear. The present systematic review aimed to compare patients with CRLM who underwent MLR versus standard hepatectomy regarding short- and long-term outcomes. MLR is a feasible procedure but has a higher risk of major complications. MLR did not negatively affect long-term survival, suggesting that an extended resection is an option for potentially curative treatment for selected patients with CRLM.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2022-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/21360910.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100099Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100099Clinics; v. 77 (2022); 100099Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 1000991980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213609/195695Copyright (c) 2023 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilveira Júnior, SérgioTustumi, FranciscoMagalhães, Daniel de PaivaJeismann, Vagner BirkFonseca, Gilton MarquesKruger, Jaime Arthur PirolaCoelho, Fabricio FerreiraHerman, Paulo2023-07-06T13:04:54Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/213609Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-07-06T13:04:54Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Silveira Júnior, Sérgio Colorectal neoplasms Liver Hepatectomy Margins of excision Survival analysis Meta-analysis |
title_short |
The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Silveira Júnior, Sérgio |
author_facet |
Silveira Júnior, Sérgio Tustumi, Francisco Magalhães, Daniel de Paiva Jeismann, Vagner Birk Fonseca, Gilton Marques Kruger, Jaime Arthur Pirola Coelho, Fabricio Ferreira Herman, Paulo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tustumi, Francisco Magalhães, Daniel de Paiva Jeismann, Vagner Birk Fonseca, Gilton Marques Kruger, Jaime Arthur Pirola Coelho, Fabricio Ferreira Herman, Paulo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silveira Júnior, Sérgio Tustumi, Francisco Magalhães, Daniel de Paiva Jeismann, Vagner Birk Fonseca, Gilton Marques Kruger, Jaime Arthur Pirola Coelho, Fabricio Ferreira Herman, Paulo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Colorectal neoplasms Liver Hepatectomy Margins of excision Survival analysis Meta-analysis |
topic |
Colorectal neoplasms Liver Hepatectomy Margins of excision Survival analysis Meta-analysis |
description |
The impact of Multivisceral Liver Resection (MLR) on the outcome of patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis (CRLM) is unclear. The present systematic review aimed to compare patients with CRLM who underwent MLR versus standard hepatectomy regarding short- and long-term outcomes. MLR is a feasible procedure but has a higher risk of major complications. MLR did not negatively affect long-term survival, suggesting that an extended resection is an option for potentially curative treatment for selected patients with CRLM. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213609 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100099 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213609 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100099 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213609/195695 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100099 Clinics; v. 77 (2022); 100099 Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100099 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222767057993728 |