Effect of renal embolization with trisacryl and PAVc

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbosa, Leandro de Assis
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Caldas, Jose Guilherme Mendes Pereira, Conti, Mario Luiz, Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa, Ramos Jr., Francisco Ferreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18075
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the degree of vascular occlusion, vascular recanalization, and necrosis of the vascular wall caused by polyvinyl alcohol-covered polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) particles compared to trisacryl particles after renal embolization. METHODS: Seventy-nine female albino New Zealand rabbits underwent arterial catheterization of the right kidney. Thirty-three animals were embolized with trisacryl particles, thirty-one with PVAc particles, and fifteen were kept as controls. Four animals were excluded (three trisacryl and one PVAc) due to early death. Five subgroups of six animals were created. The animals in the different groups were sacrificed either 48 hours, 5 days, 10 days, 30 days, or 90 days after embolization. The control group was divided into subgroups of three animals each and kept for the same periods of time. The kidneys were dyed with hematoxylin-eosin and Masson's trichrome and then examined using optical microscopy. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the degree of vascular occlusion caused by the trisacryl and the PVAc particles between the five-day and the ten-day groups. Additional differences were noted between the five-day and 48-hour groups in regard to the amount of necrosis. For both findings, the PVAc group members showed adequate tissue reaction (ischemia and volumetric reduction) and less recanalization than those treated with trisacryl. CONCLUSION: The use of PVAc as an embolization material exhibited an adequate tissue reaction (ischemia and volumetric reduction), more expressive vascular occlusion and necrosis, and less recanalization than the trisacryl material.
id USP-19_a846e3e7f21dba12d558847f42e79e12
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/18075
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of renal embolization with trisacryl and PAVc Therapeutic embolizationParticlesMicrospheresInterventional radiologyKidney OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the degree of vascular occlusion, vascular recanalization, and necrosis of the vascular wall caused by polyvinyl alcohol-covered polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) particles compared to trisacryl particles after renal embolization. METHODS: Seventy-nine female albino New Zealand rabbits underwent arterial catheterization of the right kidney. Thirty-three animals were embolized with trisacryl particles, thirty-one with PVAc particles, and fifteen were kept as controls. Four animals were excluded (three trisacryl and one PVAc) due to early death. Five subgroups of six animals were created. The animals in the different groups were sacrificed either 48 hours, 5 days, 10 days, 30 days, or 90 days after embolization. The control group was divided into subgroups of three animals each and kept for the same periods of time. The kidneys were dyed with hematoxylin-eosin and Masson's trichrome and then examined using optical microscopy. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the degree of vascular occlusion caused by the trisacryl and the PVAc particles between the five-day and the ten-day groups. Additional differences were noted between the five-day and 48-hour groups in regard to the amount of necrosis. For both findings, the PVAc group members showed adequate tissue reaction (ischemia and volumetric reduction) and less recanalization than those treated with trisacryl. CONCLUSION: The use of PVAc as an embolization material exhibited an adequate tissue reaction (ischemia and volumetric reduction), more expressive vascular occlusion and necrosis, and less recanalization than the trisacryl material. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2009-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1807510.1590/S1807-59322009001100011Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 11 (2009); 1105-1112 Clinics; v. 64 n. 11 (2009); 1105-1112 Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 11 (2009); 1105-1112 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18075/20139Barbosa, Leandro de AssisCaldas, Jose Guilherme Mendes PereiraConti, Mario LuizMalheiros, Denise Maria Avancini CostaRamos Jr., Francisco Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-22T18:54:34Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/18075Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-22T18:54:34Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of renal embolization with trisacryl and PAVc
title Effect of renal embolization with trisacryl and PAVc
spellingShingle Effect of renal embolization with trisacryl and PAVc
Barbosa, Leandro de Assis
Therapeutic embolization
Particles
Microspheres
Interventional radiology
Kidney
title_short Effect of renal embolization with trisacryl and PAVc
title_full Effect of renal embolization with trisacryl and PAVc
title_fullStr Effect of renal embolization with trisacryl and PAVc
title_full_unstemmed Effect of renal embolization with trisacryl and PAVc
title_sort Effect of renal embolization with trisacryl and PAVc
author Barbosa, Leandro de Assis
author_facet Barbosa, Leandro de Assis
Caldas, Jose Guilherme Mendes Pereira
Conti, Mario Luiz
Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa
Ramos Jr., Francisco Ferreira
author_role author
author2 Caldas, Jose Guilherme Mendes Pereira
Conti, Mario Luiz
Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa
Ramos Jr., Francisco Ferreira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbosa, Leandro de Assis
Caldas, Jose Guilherme Mendes Pereira
Conti, Mario Luiz
Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa
Ramos Jr., Francisco Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Therapeutic embolization
Particles
Microspheres
Interventional radiology
Kidney
topic Therapeutic embolization
Particles
Microspheres
Interventional radiology
Kidney
description OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the degree of vascular occlusion, vascular recanalization, and necrosis of the vascular wall caused by polyvinyl alcohol-covered polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) particles compared to trisacryl particles after renal embolization. METHODS: Seventy-nine female albino New Zealand rabbits underwent arterial catheterization of the right kidney. Thirty-three animals were embolized with trisacryl particles, thirty-one with PVAc particles, and fifteen were kept as controls. Four animals were excluded (three trisacryl and one PVAc) due to early death. Five subgroups of six animals were created. The animals in the different groups were sacrificed either 48 hours, 5 days, 10 days, 30 days, or 90 days after embolization. The control group was divided into subgroups of three animals each and kept for the same periods of time. The kidneys were dyed with hematoxylin-eosin and Masson's trichrome and then examined using optical microscopy. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the degree of vascular occlusion caused by the trisacryl and the PVAc particles between the five-day and the ten-day groups. Additional differences were noted between the five-day and 48-hour groups in regard to the amount of necrosis. For both findings, the PVAc group members showed adequate tissue reaction (ischemia and volumetric reduction) and less recanalization than those treated with trisacryl. CONCLUSION: The use of PVAc as an embolization material exhibited an adequate tissue reaction (ischemia and volumetric reduction), more expressive vascular occlusion and necrosis, and less recanalization than the trisacryl material.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18075
10.1590/S1807-59322009001100011
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18075
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322009001100011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18075/20139
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 11 (2009); 1105-1112
Clinics; v. 64 n. 11 (2009); 1105-1112
Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 11 (2009); 1105-1112
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222754811674624