A novel body mass index reference range - an observational study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Morais, Sirlei Siani
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Ide, Mirena, Morgan, Andrea Moreno, Surita, Fernanda Garanhani
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/141509
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To generate a new body mass index curve of reference values and ranges for body mass index and weight gain during pregnancy and to compare the new curve and weight gain ranges with the currently used references. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted with a total of 5,656 weight and body mass index measurements in 641 women with single pregnancy who attended their first prenatal visit before 12 weeks. All the women were over 18 years old and had no medical conditions that would influence body mass index. Data were collected using prenatal charts and medical records during hospitalization for childbirth. A linear regression method was used for standard curve smoothing in the general population and for specific curves according to the baseline body mass index classification. Curves were obtained for the 5th, 10th, 50th, 85th, 90th and 95th percentiles. Concordance between the classification of women using the newly generated and currently used curves was evaluated by percentages and kappa coefficients. The weight gain was compared with the reference values of the Institute of Medicine using Student’s T test. The data were analyzed using SAS software version 9.2, and the significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: A general reference curve of percentiles of body mass index by gestational age was established. Additionally, four specific curves were generated according to the four baseline body mass index categories. The new general curve offered percentile limits for women according to their initial body mass index and according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention limits, showing poor agreement with the currently used curve (48.3%). Women who were overweight or obese when starting prenatal care had higher weight gain than the Institute of Medicine recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The new proposed curve for body mass index during pregnancy showed weak agreement with the currently used curve. The new curve provided more information regarding body mass index increase using percentiles for general and specific groups of body mass index. Overweight pregnant women showed an upward body mass index trend throughout pregnancy that increased more dramatically than those of other groups of pregnant women, and they also presented a major mean difference between weight gain and the Institute of Medicine recommendation.
id USP-19_ba6592796c9dcdb1de2909b808079989
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/141509
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling A novel body mass index reference range - an observational studyGestational Weight GainBody Mass IndexPrenatal CareOBJECTIVE: To generate a new body mass index curve of reference values and ranges for body mass index and weight gain during pregnancy and to compare the new curve and weight gain ranges with the currently used references. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted with a total of 5,656 weight and body mass index measurements in 641 women with single pregnancy who attended their first prenatal visit before 12 weeks. All the women were over 18 years old and had no medical conditions that would influence body mass index. Data were collected using prenatal charts and medical records during hospitalization for childbirth. A linear regression method was used for standard curve smoothing in the general population and for specific curves according to the baseline body mass index classification. Curves were obtained for the 5th, 10th, 50th, 85th, 90th and 95th percentiles. Concordance between the classification of women using the newly generated and currently used curves was evaluated by percentages and kappa coefficients. The weight gain was compared with the reference values of the Institute of Medicine using Student’s T test. The data were analyzed using SAS software version 9.2, and the significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: A general reference curve of percentiles of body mass index by gestational age was established. Additionally, four specific curves were generated according to the four baseline body mass index categories. The new general curve offered percentile limits for women according to their initial body mass index and according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention limits, showing poor agreement with the currently used curve (48.3%). Women who were overweight or obese when starting prenatal care had higher weight gain than the Institute of Medicine recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The new proposed curve for body mass index during pregnancy showed weak agreement with the currently used curve. The new curve provided more information regarding body mass index increase using percentiles for general and specific groups of body mass index. Overweight pregnant women showed an upward body mass index trend throughout pregnancy that increased more dramatically than those of other groups of pregnant women, and they also presented a major mean difference between weight gain and the Institute of Medicine recommendation.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2017-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/14150910.6061/clinics/2017(11)09Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 11 (2017); 698-707Clinics; v. 72 n. 11 (2017); 698-707Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 11 (2017); 698-7071980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/141509/136525Copyright (c) 2017 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorais, Sirlei SianiIde, MirenaMorgan, Andrea MorenoSurita, Fernanda Garanhani2017-12-12T15:04:29Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/141509Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2017-12-12T15:04:29Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A novel body mass index reference range - an observational study
title A novel body mass index reference range - an observational study
spellingShingle A novel body mass index reference range - an observational study
Morais, Sirlei Siani
Gestational Weight Gain
Body Mass Index
Prenatal Care
title_short A novel body mass index reference range - an observational study
title_full A novel body mass index reference range - an observational study
title_fullStr A novel body mass index reference range - an observational study
title_full_unstemmed A novel body mass index reference range - an observational study
title_sort A novel body mass index reference range - an observational study
author Morais, Sirlei Siani
author_facet Morais, Sirlei Siani
Ide, Mirena
Morgan, Andrea Moreno
Surita, Fernanda Garanhani
author_role author
author2 Ide, Mirena
Morgan, Andrea Moreno
Surita, Fernanda Garanhani
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Morais, Sirlei Siani
Ide, Mirena
Morgan, Andrea Moreno
Surita, Fernanda Garanhani
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gestational Weight Gain
Body Mass Index
Prenatal Care
topic Gestational Weight Gain
Body Mass Index
Prenatal Care
description OBJECTIVE: To generate a new body mass index curve of reference values and ranges for body mass index and weight gain during pregnancy and to compare the new curve and weight gain ranges with the currently used references. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted with a total of 5,656 weight and body mass index measurements in 641 women with single pregnancy who attended their first prenatal visit before 12 weeks. All the women were over 18 years old and had no medical conditions that would influence body mass index. Data were collected using prenatal charts and medical records during hospitalization for childbirth. A linear regression method was used for standard curve smoothing in the general population and for specific curves according to the baseline body mass index classification. Curves were obtained for the 5th, 10th, 50th, 85th, 90th and 95th percentiles. Concordance between the classification of women using the newly generated and currently used curves was evaluated by percentages and kappa coefficients. The weight gain was compared with the reference values of the Institute of Medicine using Student’s T test. The data were analyzed using SAS software version 9.2, and the significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: A general reference curve of percentiles of body mass index by gestational age was established. Additionally, four specific curves were generated according to the four baseline body mass index categories. The new general curve offered percentile limits for women according to their initial body mass index and according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention limits, showing poor agreement with the currently used curve (48.3%). Women who were overweight or obese when starting prenatal care had higher weight gain than the Institute of Medicine recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The new proposed curve for body mass index during pregnancy showed weak agreement with the currently used curve. The new curve provided more information regarding body mass index increase using percentiles for general and specific groups of body mass index. Overweight pregnant women showed an upward body mass index trend throughout pregnancy that increased more dramatically than those of other groups of pregnant women, and they also presented a major mean difference between weight gain and the Institute of Medicine recommendation.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/141509
10.6061/clinics/2017(11)09
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/141509
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2017(11)09
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/141509/136525
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 11 (2017); 698-707
Clinics; v. 72 n. 11 (2017); 698-707
Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 11 (2017); 698-707
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222763619713024