Association between monocyte lymphocyte ratio and abdominal aortic calcification in US adults: A cross-sectional study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zuo, Peiyuan
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Xu, Ranran, Hu, Liya, Hu, Wei, Tong, Song
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214035
Resumo: Background This study aimed to evaluate the association between Monocyte Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) and Abdominal Aortic Calcification (AAC) in adults over 40 years of age in the United States. Methods Data were collected from the 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). AAC was quantified by the Kauppila score system based on dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry. Severe AAC was defined as a total AAC score > 6. The lymphocyte count and monocyte count can be directly obtained from laboratory data files. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between MLR and the AAC score and severe AAC. Results A total of 3,045 participants were included in the present study. After adjusting for multiple covariates, MLR was positively associated with higher AAC score (β = 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.34, p = 0.0032) and the odds of severe AAC increased by 14% per 0.1 unit increase in the MLR (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.00, 1.31, p = 0.0541). The Odds Ratio (OR) (95% CI) of severe AAC for participants in MLR tertile 3 was 1.88 (1.02, 3.47) compared with those in tertile 1 (p for trend = 0.0341). Subgroup analyses showed that a stronger association was detected in the elderly compared with non-elderly (p for interaction = 0.0346) and diabetes compared with non-diabetes (borderline significant p for interaction = 0.0578). Conclusion In adults in the United States, MLR was associated with higher AAC scores and a higher probability of severe AAC. MLR may become a promising tool to predict the risk of AAC.
id USP-19_c399f3fabebeff6f85580f4ff0135c81
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/214035
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Association between monocyte lymphocyte ratio and abdominal aortic calcification in US adults: A cross-sectional studyMonocyte lymphocyte ratioAbdominal aortic calcificationVascular calcificationCross-sectional study Background This study aimed to evaluate the association between Monocyte Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) and Abdominal Aortic Calcification (AAC) in adults over 40 years of age in the United States. Methods Data were collected from the 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). AAC was quantified by the Kauppila score system based on dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry. Severe AAC was defined as a total AAC score > 6. The lymphocyte count and monocyte count can be directly obtained from laboratory data files. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between MLR and the AAC score and severe AAC. Results A total of 3,045 participants were included in the present study. After adjusting for multiple covariates, MLR was positively associated with higher AAC score (β = 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.34, p = 0.0032) and the odds of severe AAC increased by 14% per 0.1 unit increase in the MLR (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.00, 1.31, p = 0.0541). The Odds Ratio (OR) (95% CI) of severe AAC for participants in MLR tertile 3 was 1.88 (1.02, 3.47) compared with those in tertile 1 (p for trend = 0.0341). Subgroup analyses showed that a stronger association was detected in the elderly compared with non-elderly (p for interaction = 0.0346) and diabetes compared with non-diabetes (borderline significant p for interaction = 0.0578). Conclusion In adults in the United States, MLR was associated with higher AAC scores and a higher probability of severe AAC. MLR may become a promising tool to predict the risk of AAC. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2023-06-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/21403510.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100232Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 100232Clinics; v. 78 (2023); 100232Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 1002321980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214035/196270Copyright (c) 2023 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZuo, PeiyuanXu, RanranHu, LiyaHu, WeiTong, Song2023-07-06T13:05:40Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/214035Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-07-06T13:05:40Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Association between monocyte lymphocyte ratio and abdominal aortic calcification in US adults: A cross-sectional study
title Association between monocyte lymphocyte ratio and abdominal aortic calcification in US adults: A cross-sectional study
spellingShingle Association between monocyte lymphocyte ratio and abdominal aortic calcification in US adults: A cross-sectional study
Zuo, Peiyuan
Monocyte lymphocyte ratio
Abdominal aortic calcification
Vascular calcification
Cross-sectional study
title_short Association between monocyte lymphocyte ratio and abdominal aortic calcification in US adults: A cross-sectional study
title_full Association between monocyte lymphocyte ratio and abdominal aortic calcification in US adults: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Association between monocyte lymphocyte ratio and abdominal aortic calcification in US adults: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Association between monocyte lymphocyte ratio and abdominal aortic calcification in US adults: A cross-sectional study
title_sort Association between monocyte lymphocyte ratio and abdominal aortic calcification in US adults: A cross-sectional study
author Zuo, Peiyuan
author_facet Zuo, Peiyuan
Xu, Ranran
Hu, Liya
Hu, Wei
Tong, Song
author_role author
author2 Xu, Ranran
Hu, Liya
Hu, Wei
Tong, Song
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zuo, Peiyuan
Xu, Ranran
Hu, Liya
Hu, Wei
Tong, Song
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Monocyte lymphocyte ratio
Abdominal aortic calcification
Vascular calcification
Cross-sectional study
topic Monocyte lymphocyte ratio
Abdominal aortic calcification
Vascular calcification
Cross-sectional study
description Background This study aimed to evaluate the association between Monocyte Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) and Abdominal Aortic Calcification (AAC) in adults over 40 years of age in the United States. Methods Data were collected from the 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). AAC was quantified by the Kauppila score system based on dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry. Severe AAC was defined as a total AAC score > 6. The lymphocyte count and monocyte count can be directly obtained from laboratory data files. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between MLR and the AAC score and severe AAC. Results A total of 3,045 participants were included in the present study. After adjusting for multiple covariates, MLR was positively associated with higher AAC score (β = 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.34, p = 0.0032) and the odds of severe AAC increased by 14% per 0.1 unit increase in the MLR (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.00, 1.31, p = 0.0541). The Odds Ratio (OR) (95% CI) of severe AAC for participants in MLR tertile 3 was 1.88 (1.02, 3.47) compared with those in tertile 1 (p for trend = 0.0341). Subgroup analyses showed that a stronger association was detected in the elderly compared with non-elderly (p for interaction = 0.0346) and diabetes compared with non-diabetes (borderline significant p for interaction = 0.0578). Conclusion In adults in the United States, MLR was associated with higher AAC scores and a higher probability of severe AAC. MLR may become a promising tool to predict the risk of AAC.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214035
10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100232
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214035
identifier_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100232
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214035/196270
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 100232
Clinics; v. 78 (2023); 100232
Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 100232
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222767412412416