Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yang, Xianghua
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Zhai, Dongcai, Zhang, Tao, Zhang, Shenjie
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: Fine-needle aspiration cytology is the risk stratification tool for thyroid nodules, and ultrasound elastography is not routinely used for the differential diagnosis of thyroid cancer. The current study aimed to compare the diagnostic parameters of ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology, using surgical pathology as the reference standard. METHODS: In total, 205 patients with abnormal thyroid function test results underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology on the basis of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System classification and strain ultrasound elastography according to the ASTERIA criteria. Histopathological examination of the surgical specimens was performed according to the 2017 World Health Organization classification system. Moreover, a beneficial score analysis for each modality was conducted. RESULTS: Of 265 nodules, 212 measured X1 cm. The strain index value increased from benign to malignant nodules, and the presence of autoimmune thyroid diseases did not affect the results (p40.05 for all categories). The sensitivities of histopathological examination, ultrasound elastography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology for detection of nodules measuring X1 cm were 1, 1, and 0.97, respectively. The working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was similar between strain ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology for highly and moderately suspicious nodules. However, for mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules, the working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was higher in strain ultrasound elastography than in fine-needle aspiration cytology. CONCLUSION: Strain ultrasound elastography for highly and moderately suspicious nodules facilitated the detection of mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules.
id USP-19_e678b33621fdaf82ae2d1e2caeecd6b2
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/171389
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysisFine Needle Aspiration CytologyInterobserver VariabilityStrain IndexThyroid NoduleUltrasoundUltrasound ElastographyOBJECTIVE: Fine-needle aspiration cytology is the risk stratification tool for thyroid nodules, and ultrasound elastography is not routinely used for the differential diagnosis of thyroid cancer. The current study aimed to compare the diagnostic parameters of ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology, using surgical pathology as the reference standard. METHODS: In total, 205 patients with abnormal thyroid function test results underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology on the basis of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System classification and strain ultrasound elastography according to the ASTERIA criteria. Histopathological examination of the surgical specimens was performed according to the 2017 World Health Organization classification system. Moreover, a beneficial score analysis for each modality was conducted. RESULTS: Of 265 nodules, 212 measured X1 cm. The strain index value increased from benign to malignant nodules, and the presence of autoimmune thyroid diseases did not affect the results (p40.05 for all categories). The sensitivities of histopathological examination, ultrasound elastography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology for detection of nodules measuring X1 cm were 1, 1, and 0.97, respectively. The working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was similar between strain ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology for highly and moderately suspicious nodules. However, for mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules, the working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was higher in strain ultrasound elastography than in fine-needle aspiration cytology. CONCLUSION: Strain ultrasound elastography for highly and moderately suspicious nodules facilitated the detection of mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2020-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17138910.6061/clinics/2020/e1594Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1594Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1594Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e15941980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389/161449https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389/161450Copyright (c) 2020 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYang, XianghuaZhai, DongcaiZhang, TaoZhang, Shenjie2020-06-23T19:15:45Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/171389Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2020-06-23T19:15:45Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis
title Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis
spellingShingle Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis
Yang, Xianghua
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology
Interobserver Variability
Strain Index
Thyroid Nodule
Ultrasound
Ultrasound Elastography
title_short Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis
title_full Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis
title_sort Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis
author Yang, Xianghua
author_facet Yang, Xianghua
Zhai, Dongcai
Zhang, Tao
Zhang, Shenjie
author_role author
author2 Zhai, Dongcai
Zhang, Tao
Zhang, Shenjie
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yang, Xianghua
Zhai, Dongcai
Zhang, Tao
Zhang, Shenjie
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology
Interobserver Variability
Strain Index
Thyroid Nodule
Ultrasound
Ultrasound Elastography
topic Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology
Interobserver Variability
Strain Index
Thyroid Nodule
Ultrasound
Ultrasound Elastography
description OBJECTIVE: Fine-needle aspiration cytology is the risk stratification tool for thyroid nodules, and ultrasound elastography is not routinely used for the differential diagnosis of thyroid cancer. The current study aimed to compare the diagnostic parameters of ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology, using surgical pathology as the reference standard. METHODS: In total, 205 patients with abnormal thyroid function test results underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology on the basis of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System classification and strain ultrasound elastography according to the ASTERIA criteria. Histopathological examination of the surgical specimens was performed according to the 2017 World Health Organization classification system. Moreover, a beneficial score analysis for each modality was conducted. RESULTS: Of 265 nodules, 212 measured X1 cm. The strain index value increased from benign to malignant nodules, and the presence of autoimmune thyroid diseases did not affect the results (p40.05 for all categories). The sensitivities of histopathological examination, ultrasound elastography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology for detection of nodules measuring X1 cm were 1, 1, and 0.97, respectively. The working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was similar between strain ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology for highly and moderately suspicious nodules. However, for mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules, the working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was higher in strain ultrasound elastography than in fine-needle aspiration cytology. CONCLUSION: Strain ultrasound elastography for highly and moderately suspicious nodules facilitated the detection of mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389
10.6061/clinics/2020/e1594
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1594
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389/161449
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389/161450
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1594
Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1594
Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1594
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222765122322432