Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: Fine-needle aspiration cytology is the risk stratification tool for thyroid nodules, and ultrasound elastography is not routinely used for the differential diagnosis of thyroid cancer. The current study aimed to compare the diagnostic parameters of ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology, using surgical pathology as the reference standard. METHODS: In total, 205 patients with abnormal thyroid function test results underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology on the basis of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System classification and strain ultrasound elastography according to the ASTERIA criteria. Histopathological examination of the surgical specimens was performed according to the 2017 World Health Organization classification system. Moreover, a beneficial score analysis for each modality was conducted. RESULTS: Of 265 nodules, 212 measured X1 cm. The strain index value increased from benign to malignant nodules, and the presence of autoimmune thyroid diseases did not affect the results (p40.05 for all categories). The sensitivities of histopathological examination, ultrasound elastography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology for detection of nodules measuring X1 cm were 1, 1, and 0.97, respectively. The working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was similar between strain ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology for highly and moderately suspicious nodules. However, for mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules, the working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was higher in strain ultrasound elastography than in fine-needle aspiration cytology. CONCLUSION: Strain ultrasound elastography for highly and moderately suspicious nodules facilitated the detection of mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules. |
id |
USP-19_e678b33621fdaf82ae2d1e2caeecd6b2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/171389 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysisFine Needle Aspiration CytologyInterobserver VariabilityStrain IndexThyroid NoduleUltrasoundUltrasound ElastographyOBJECTIVE: Fine-needle aspiration cytology is the risk stratification tool for thyroid nodules, and ultrasound elastography is not routinely used for the differential diagnosis of thyroid cancer. The current study aimed to compare the diagnostic parameters of ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology, using surgical pathology as the reference standard. METHODS: In total, 205 patients with abnormal thyroid function test results underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology on the basis of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System classification and strain ultrasound elastography according to the ASTERIA criteria. Histopathological examination of the surgical specimens was performed according to the 2017 World Health Organization classification system. Moreover, a beneficial score analysis for each modality was conducted. RESULTS: Of 265 nodules, 212 measured X1 cm. The strain index value increased from benign to malignant nodules, and the presence of autoimmune thyroid diseases did not affect the results (p40.05 for all categories). The sensitivities of histopathological examination, ultrasound elastography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology for detection of nodules measuring X1 cm were 1, 1, and 0.97, respectively. The working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was similar between strain ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology for highly and moderately suspicious nodules. However, for mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules, the working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was higher in strain ultrasound elastography than in fine-needle aspiration cytology. CONCLUSION: Strain ultrasound elastography for highly and moderately suspicious nodules facilitated the detection of mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2020-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17138910.6061/clinics/2020/e1594Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1594Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1594Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e15941980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389/161449https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389/161450Copyright (c) 2020 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYang, XianghuaZhai, DongcaiZhang, TaoZhang, Shenjie2020-06-23T19:15:45Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/171389Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2020-06-23T19:15:45Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis |
title |
Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis |
spellingShingle |
Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis Yang, Xianghua Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Interobserver Variability Strain Index Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Ultrasound Elastography |
title_short |
Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis |
title_full |
Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr |
Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis |
title_sort |
Use of strain ultrasound elastography versus fineneedle aspiration cytology for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a retrospective analysis |
author |
Yang, Xianghua |
author_facet |
Yang, Xianghua Zhai, Dongcai Zhang, Tao Zhang, Shenjie |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zhai, Dongcai Zhang, Tao Zhang, Shenjie |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Yang, Xianghua Zhai, Dongcai Zhang, Tao Zhang, Shenjie |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Interobserver Variability Strain Index Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Ultrasound Elastography |
topic |
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Interobserver Variability Strain Index Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Ultrasound Elastography |
description |
OBJECTIVE: Fine-needle aspiration cytology is the risk stratification tool for thyroid nodules, and ultrasound elastography is not routinely used for the differential diagnosis of thyroid cancer. The current study aimed to compare the diagnostic parameters of ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology, using surgical pathology as the reference standard. METHODS: In total, 205 patients with abnormal thyroid function test results underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology on the basis of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging-Reporting and Data System classification and strain ultrasound elastography according to the ASTERIA criteria. Histopathological examination of the surgical specimens was performed according to the 2017 World Health Organization classification system. Moreover, a beneficial score analysis for each modality was conducted. RESULTS: Of 265 nodules, 212 measured X1 cm. The strain index value increased from benign to malignant nodules, and the presence of autoimmune thyroid diseases did not affect the results (p40.05 for all categories). The sensitivities of histopathological examination, ultrasound elastography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology for detection of nodules measuring X1 cm were 1, 1, and 0.97, respectively. The working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was similar between strain ultrasound elastography and fine-needle aspiration cytology for highly and moderately suspicious nodules. However, for mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules, the working area for detecting nodule(s) in a single image was higher in strain ultrasound elastography than in fine-needle aspiration cytology. CONCLUSION: Strain ultrasound elastography for highly and moderately suspicious nodules facilitated the detection of mildly suspicious, unsuspicious, and benign nodules. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1594 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2020/e1594 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389/161449 https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/171389/161450 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1594 Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1594 Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1594 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222765122322432 |