Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Daniele Freitas
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Natour, Jamil, Buosi, Ana Leticia Pirozzi de, Ferreira, Fernando Bernardes Maia Diniz, Fernandes, Artur da Rocha Correa, Furtado, Rita Nely Vilar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/77091
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: This study compares the clinical, ultrasonography, radiography, and laboratory outcomes of painless and painful chronic synovitis in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 60 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints; 30 of the patients did not experience pain, and 30 had experienced pain for at least 6 months prior to the study. The radiocarpal, distal radioulnar, and metacarpophalangeal joints were evaluated using the ultrasound gray scale, power Doppler, and radiography. Past and present clinical and laboratory findings were also evaluated. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for most of the outcomes. The group with pain scored worse on the disease activity indices (e.g., DAS 28 and SDAI), function questionnaires (HAQ and Cochin), and pinch strength test. A logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of an immunobiological agent was associated with a 3-fold greater chance of belonging to the group that experienced pain. The painless group had worse erosion scores in the second and fifth metacarpophalangeal with odd ratios (ORs) of 6.5 and 3.5, respectively. The painless group had more cartilage with grade 4 damage in the third metacarpophalangeal. CONCLUSIONS: The rheumatoid arthritis patients with both painless and painful synovitis exhibited similar disease histories and radiographic and ultrasound findings. However, the ultrasonography evaluation revealed worse scores in the second and fifth metacarpophalangeal of the synovitis patients who did not experience pain.
id USP-19_f10d1ef4183d01da7f9a09f0bc4e4e00
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/77091
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trialOBJECTIVE: This study compares the clinical, ultrasonography, radiography, and laboratory outcomes of painless and painful chronic synovitis in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 60 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints; 30 of the patients did not experience pain, and 30 had experienced pain for at least 6 months prior to the study. The radiocarpal, distal radioulnar, and metacarpophalangeal joints were evaluated using the ultrasound gray scale, power Doppler, and radiography. Past and present clinical and laboratory findings were also evaluated. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for most of the outcomes. The group with pain scored worse on the disease activity indices (e.g., DAS 28 and SDAI), function questionnaires (HAQ and Cochin), and pinch strength test. A logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of an immunobiological agent was associated with a 3-fold greater chance of belonging to the group that experienced pain. The painless group had worse erosion scores in the second and fifth metacarpophalangeal with odd ratios (ORs) of 6.5 and 3.5, respectively. The painless group had more cartilage with grade 4 damage in the third metacarpophalangeal. CONCLUSIONS: The rheumatoid arthritis patients with both painless and painful synovitis exhibited similar disease histories and radiographic and ultrasound findings. However, the ultrasonography evaluation revealed worse scores in the second and fifth metacarpophalangeal of the synovitis patients who did not experience pain.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2014-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/7709110.1590/clin.v69i2.77091Clinics; Vol. 69 No. 2 (2014); 93-100Clinics; v. 69 n. 2 (2014); 93-100Clinics; Vol. 69 Núm. 2 (2014); 93-1001980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/77091/80958Pereira, Daniele FreitasNatour, JamilBuosi, Ana Leticia Pirozzi deFerreira, Fernando Bernardes Maia DinizFernandes, Artur da Rocha CorreaFurtado, Rita Nely Vilarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-03-24T12:27:21Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/77091Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2014-03-24T12:27:21Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trial
title Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trial
spellingShingle Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trial
Pereira, Daniele Freitas
title_short Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trial
title_full Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trial
title_fullStr Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trial
title_sort Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trial
author Pereira, Daniele Freitas
author_facet Pereira, Daniele Freitas
Natour, Jamil
Buosi, Ana Leticia Pirozzi de
Ferreira, Fernando Bernardes Maia Diniz
Fernandes, Artur da Rocha Correa
Furtado, Rita Nely Vilar
author_role author
author2 Natour, Jamil
Buosi, Ana Leticia Pirozzi de
Ferreira, Fernando Bernardes Maia Diniz
Fernandes, Artur da Rocha Correa
Furtado, Rita Nely Vilar
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Daniele Freitas
Natour, Jamil
Buosi, Ana Leticia Pirozzi de
Ferreira, Fernando Bernardes Maia Diniz
Fernandes, Artur da Rocha Correa
Furtado, Rita Nely Vilar
description OBJECTIVE: This study compares the clinical, ultrasonography, radiography, and laboratory outcomes of painless and painful chronic synovitis in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 60 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints; 30 of the patients did not experience pain, and 30 had experienced pain for at least 6 months prior to the study. The radiocarpal, distal radioulnar, and metacarpophalangeal joints were evaluated using the ultrasound gray scale, power Doppler, and radiography. Past and present clinical and laboratory findings were also evaluated. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for most of the outcomes. The group with pain scored worse on the disease activity indices (e.g., DAS 28 and SDAI), function questionnaires (HAQ and Cochin), and pinch strength test. A logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of an immunobiological agent was associated with a 3-fold greater chance of belonging to the group that experienced pain. The painless group had worse erosion scores in the second and fifth metacarpophalangeal with odd ratios (ORs) of 6.5 and 3.5, respectively. The painless group had more cartilage with grade 4 damage in the third metacarpophalangeal. CONCLUSIONS: The rheumatoid arthritis patients with both painless and painful synovitis exhibited similar disease histories and radiographic and ultrasound findings. However, the ultrasonography evaluation revealed worse scores in the second and fifth metacarpophalangeal of the synovitis patients who did not experience pain.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/77091
10.1590/clin.v69i2.77091
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/77091
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/clin.v69i2.77091
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/77091/80958
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 69 No. 2 (2014); 93-100
Clinics; v. 69 n. 2 (2014); 93-100
Clinics; Vol. 69 Núm. 2 (2014); 93-100
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222761114664960