Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tomomitsu, Mônica S.V.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Alonso, Angelica Castilho, Morimoto, Eurica, Bobbio, Tatiana G., Greve, Julia M.D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76796
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of reduced visual information on postural control by comparing low-vision and normal-vision adults in static and dynamic conditions. METHODS: Twenty-five low-vision subjects and twenty-five normal sighted adults were evaluated for static and dynamic balance using four protocols: 1) the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance on firm and foam surfaces with eyes opened and closed; 2) Unilateral Stance with eyes opened and closed; 3) Tandem Walk; and 4) Step Up/Over. RESULTS: The results showed that the low-vision group presented greater body sway compared with the normal vision during balance on a foam surface (p≤0.001), the Unilateral Stance test for both limbs (p≤0.001), and the Tandem Walk test. The low-vision group showed greater step width (p≤0.001) and slower gait speed (p≤0.004). In the Step Up/Over task, low-vision participants were more cautious in stepping up (right p≤0.005 and left p≤0.009) and in executing the movement (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that visual feedback is crucial for determining balance, especially for dynamic tasks and on foam surfaces. Low-vision individuals had worse postural stability than normal-vision adults in terms of dynamic tests and balance on foam surfaces.
id USP-19_f1913606463842527d3a7c3409786c82
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/76796
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adultsOBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of reduced visual information on postural control by comparing low-vision and normal-vision adults in static and dynamic conditions. METHODS: Twenty-five low-vision subjects and twenty-five normal sighted adults were evaluated for static and dynamic balance using four protocols: 1) the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance on firm and foam surfaces with eyes opened and closed; 2) Unilateral Stance with eyes opened and closed; 3) Tandem Walk; and 4) Step Up/Over. RESULTS: The results showed that the low-vision group presented greater body sway compared with the normal vision during balance on a foam surface (p≤0.001), the Unilateral Stance test for both limbs (p≤0.001), and the Tandem Walk test. The low-vision group showed greater step width (p≤0.001) and slower gait speed (p≤0.004). In the Step Up/Over task, low-vision participants were more cautious in stepping up (right p≤0.005 and left p≤0.009) and in executing the movement (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that visual feedback is crucial for determining balance, especially for dynamic tasks and on foam surfaces. Low-vision individuals had worse postural stability than normal-vision adults in terms of dynamic tests and balance on foam surfaces.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2013-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/7679610.1590/clin.v68i4.76796Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 4 (2013); 517-521Clinics; v. 68 n. 4 (2013); 517-521Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 4 (2013); 517-5211980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76796/80658Tomomitsu, Mônica S.V.Alonso, Angelica CastilhoMorimoto, EuricaBobbio, Tatiana G.Greve, Julia M.D.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-03-21T18:32:40Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/76796Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2014-03-21T18:32:40Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults
title Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults
spellingShingle Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults
Tomomitsu, Mônica S.V.
title_short Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults
title_full Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults
title_fullStr Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults
title_full_unstemmed Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults
title_sort Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults
author Tomomitsu, Mônica S.V.
author_facet Tomomitsu, Mônica S.V.
Alonso, Angelica Castilho
Morimoto, Eurica
Bobbio, Tatiana G.
Greve, Julia M.D.
author_role author
author2 Alonso, Angelica Castilho
Morimoto, Eurica
Bobbio, Tatiana G.
Greve, Julia M.D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tomomitsu, Mônica S.V.
Alonso, Angelica Castilho
Morimoto, Eurica
Bobbio, Tatiana G.
Greve, Julia M.D.
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of reduced visual information on postural control by comparing low-vision and normal-vision adults in static and dynamic conditions. METHODS: Twenty-five low-vision subjects and twenty-five normal sighted adults were evaluated for static and dynamic balance using four protocols: 1) the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance on firm and foam surfaces with eyes opened and closed; 2) Unilateral Stance with eyes opened and closed; 3) Tandem Walk; and 4) Step Up/Over. RESULTS: The results showed that the low-vision group presented greater body sway compared with the normal vision during balance on a foam surface (p≤0.001), the Unilateral Stance test for both limbs (p≤0.001), and the Tandem Walk test. The low-vision group showed greater step width (p≤0.001) and slower gait speed (p≤0.004). In the Step Up/Over task, low-vision participants were more cautious in stepping up (right p≤0.005 and left p≤0.009) and in executing the movement (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that visual feedback is crucial for determining balance, especially for dynamic tasks and on foam surfaces. Low-vision individuals had worse postural stability than normal-vision adults in terms of dynamic tests and balance on foam surfaces.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76796
10.1590/clin.v68i4.76796
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76796
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/clin.v68i4.76796
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76796/80658
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 4 (2013); 517-521
Clinics; v. 68 n. 4 (2013); 517-521
Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 4 (2013); 517-521
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222760114323456