Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76796 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of reduced visual information on postural control by comparing low-vision and normal-vision adults in static and dynamic conditions. METHODS: Twenty-five low-vision subjects and twenty-five normal sighted adults were evaluated for static and dynamic balance using four protocols: 1) the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance on firm and foam surfaces with eyes opened and closed; 2) Unilateral Stance with eyes opened and closed; 3) Tandem Walk; and 4) Step Up/Over. RESULTS: The results showed that the low-vision group presented greater body sway compared with the normal vision during balance on a foam surface (p≤0.001), the Unilateral Stance test for both limbs (p≤0.001), and the Tandem Walk test. The low-vision group showed greater step width (p≤0.001) and slower gait speed (p≤0.004). In the Step Up/Over task, low-vision participants were more cautious in stepping up (right p≤0.005 and left p≤0.009) and in executing the movement (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that visual feedback is crucial for determining balance, especially for dynamic tasks and on foam surfaces. Low-vision individuals had worse postural stability than normal-vision adults in terms of dynamic tests and balance on foam surfaces. |
id |
USP-19_f1913606463842527d3a7c3409786c82 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/76796 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adultsOBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of reduced visual information on postural control by comparing low-vision and normal-vision adults in static and dynamic conditions. METHODS: Twenty-five low-vision subjects and twenty-five normal sighted adults were evaluated for static and dynamic balance using four protocols: 1) the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance on firm and foam surfaces with eyes opened and closed; 2) Unilateral Stance with eyes opened and closed; 3) Tandem Walk; and 4) Step Up/Over. RESULTS: The results showed that the low-vision group presented greater body sway compared with the normal vision during balance on a foam surface (p≤0.001), the Unilateral Stance test for both limbs (p≤0.001), and the Tandem Walk test. The low-vision group showed greater step width (p≤0.001) and slower gait speed (p≤0.004). In the Step Up/Over task, low-vision participants were more cautious in stepping up (right p≤0.005 and left p≤0.009) and in executing the movement (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that visual feedback is crucial for determining balance, especially for dynamic tasks and on foam surfaces. Low-vision individuals had worse postural stability than normal-vision adults in terms of dynamic tests and balance on foam surfaces.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2013-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/7679610.1590/clin.v68i4.76796Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 4 (2013); 517-521Clinics; v. 68 n. 4 (2013); 517-521Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 4 (2013); 517-5211980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76796/80658Tomomitsu, Mônica S.V.Alonso, Angelica CastilhoMorimoto, EuricaBobbio, Tatiana G.Greve, Julia M.D.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-03-21T18:32:40Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/76796Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2014-03-21T18:32:40Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults |
title |
Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults |
spellingShingle |
Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults Tomomitsu, Mônica S.V. |
title_short |
Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults |
title_full |
Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults |
title_fullStr |
Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults |
title_sort |
Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults |
author |
Tomomitsu, Mônica S.V. |
author_facet |
Tomomitsu, Mônica S.V. Alonso, Angelica Castilho Morimoto, Eurica Bobbio, Tatiana G. Greve, Julia M.D. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alonso, Angelica Castilho Morimoto, Eurica Bobbio, Tatiana G. Greve, Julia M.D. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tomomitsu, Mônica S.V. Alonso, Angelica Castilho Morimoto, Eurica Bobbio, Tatiana G. Greve, Julia M.D. |
description |
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of reduced visual information on postural control by comparing low-vision and normal-vision adults in static and dynamic conditions. METHODS: Twenty-five low-vision subjects and twenty-five normal sighted adults were evaluated for static and dynamic balance using four protocols: 1) the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance on firm and foam surfaces with eyes opened and closed; 2) Unilateral Stance with eyes opened and closed; 3) Tandem Walk; and 4) Step Up/Over. RESULTS: The results showed that the low-vision group presented greater body sway compared with the normal vision during balance on a foam surface (p≤0.001), the Unilateral Stance test for both limbs (p≤0.001), and the Tandem Walk test. The low-vision group showed greater step width (p≤0.001) and slower gait speed (p≤0.004). In the Step Up/Over task, low-vision participants were more cautious in stepping up (right p≤0.005 and left p≤0.009) and in executing the movement (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that visual feedback is crucial for determining balance, especially for dynamic tasks and on foam surfaces. Low-vision individuals had worse postural stability than normal-vision adults in terms of dynamic tests and balance on foam surfaces. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76796 10.1590/clin.v68i4.76796 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76796 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/clin.v68i4.76796 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76796/80658 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 4 (2013); 517-521 Clinics; v. 68 n. 4 (2013); 517-521 Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 4 (2013); 517-521 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222760114323456 |