Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santiago, Bruno Vitor Martins
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Ana Beatriz Garcez de, Silva, Gabriel Machado Romão da, Silva, Maxuel de Freitas da, Bergamo, Pedro Ernandes, Parise, Maud, Villela, Nivaldo Ribeiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214061
Resumo: Objective: This review synthesized existing studies on the prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil and its associated factors to produce a recent estimation to guide public health politics. Methods: A search was carried out in the Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and BVS Regional/Lilacs databases to identify population-based cross-sectional studies from 2005 to 2020, which reported the prevalence of benign chronic pain in Brazil (more than three months). The risk of bias was assessed using design, sample size determination, and random selection as essential issues. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated for chronic pain in the general and elderly populations. The protocol was registered on Prospero (CRD42021249678). Results: Of the 682 identified, 15 macheted the authors’ inclusion criteria. Chronic pain prevalence in the general adult population ranged from 23.02% to 42.33% (pooled estimate 35.70%, 95% Cis 30.42 to 41.17) and was described as moderate to intense. It was associated with female sex, old age, lower education, intense professional activity, excessive alcohol consumption, smoking, central obesity, mood disorder, and sedentarism. The Southeastern and Southern regions presented a higher prevalence. The prevalence in the elderly population ranged from 29.3% to 76.2% (pooled estimate 47.32%, 95% Cis 33.73 to 61.11). In addition, this population visited doctors more frequently, had more sleep disorders, and was more dependent on daily living activities. Almost fifty percent of both populations with chronic pain reported pain-induced disability. Conclusion: Chronic Pain is highly prevalent in Brazil and associated with significant distress, disability, and poorly controlled.
id USP-19_f658f9ae508b96e25cdc83039494e7c1
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/214061
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysisChronic painPrevalenceRisk factorsSystematic reviewMeta-analysisObjective: This review synthesized existing studies on the prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil and its associated factors to produce a recent estimation to guide public health politics. Methods: A search was carried out in the Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and BVS Regional/Lilacs databases to identify population-based cross-sectional studies from 2005 to 2020, which reported the prevalence of benign chronic pain in Brazil (more than three months). The risk of bias was assessed using design, sample size determination, and random selection as essential issues. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated for chronic pain in the general and elderly populations. The protocol was registered on Prospero (CRD42021249678). Results: Of the 682 identified, 15 macheted the authors’ inclusion criteria. Chronic pain prevalence in the general adult population ranged from 23.02% to 42.33% (pooled estimate 35.70%, 95% Cis 30.42 to 41.17) and was described as moderate to intense. It was associated with female sex, old age, lower education, intense professional activity, excessive alcohol consumption, smoking, central obesity, mood disorder, and sedentarism. The Southeastern and Southern regions presented a higher prevalence. The prevalence in the elderly population ranged from 29.3% to 76.2% (pooled estimate 47.32%, 95% Cis 33.73 to 61.11). In addition, this population visited doctors more frequently, had more sleep disorders, and was more dependent on daily living activities. Almost fifty percent of both populations with chronic pain reported pain-induced disability. Conclusion: Chronic Pain is highly prevalent in Brazil and associated with significant distress, disability, and poorly controlled.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2023-05-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/21406110.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100209Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 100209Clinics; v. 78 (2023); 100209Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 1002091980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214061/196292Copyright (c) 2023 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantiago, Bruno Vitor MartinsOliveira, Ana Beatriz Garcez deSilva, Gabriel Machado Romão daSilva, Maxuel de Freitas daBergamo, Pedro ErnandesParise, MaudVillela, Nivaldo Ribeiro2023-07-06T13:05:36Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/214061Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-07-06T13:05:36Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Santiago, Bruno Vitor Martins
Chronic pain
Prevalence
Risk factors
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
title_short Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
author Santiago, Bruno Vitor Martins
author_facet Santiago, Bruno Vitor Martins
Oliveira, Ana Beatriz Garcez de
Silva, Gabriel Machado Romão da
Silva, Maxuel de Freitas da
Bergamo, Pedro Ernandes
Parise, Maud
Villela, Nivaldo Ribeiro
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Ana Beatriz Garcez de
Silva, Gabriel Machado Romão da
Silva, Maxuel de Freitas da
Bergamo, Pedro Ernandes
Parise, Maud
Villela, Nivaldo Ribeiro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santiago, Bruno Vitor Martins
Oliveira, Ana Beatriz Garcez de
Silva, Gabriel Machado Romão da
Silva, Maxuel de Freitas da
Bergamo, Pedro Ernandes
Parise, Maud
Villela, Nivaldo Ribeiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chronic pain
Prevalence
Risk factors
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
topic Chronic pain
Prevalence
Risk factors
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
description Objective: This review synthesized existing studies on the prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil and its associated factors to produce a recent estimation to guide public health politics. Methods: A search was carried out in the Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and BVS Regional/Lilacs databases to identify population-based cross-sectional studies from 2005 to 2020, which reported the prevalence of benign chronic pain in Brazil (more than three months). The risk of bias was assessed using design, sample size determination, and random selection as essential issues. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated for chronic pain in the general and elderly populations. The protocol was registered on Prospero (CRD42021249678). Results: Of the 682 identified, 15 macheted the authors’ inclusion criteria. Chronic pain prevalence in the general adult population ranged from 23.02% to 42.33% (pooled estimate 35.70%, 95% Cis 30.42 to 41.17) and was described as moderate to intense. It was associated with female sex, old age, lower education, intense professional activity, excessive alcohol consumption, smoking, central obesity, mood disorder, and sedentarism. The Southeastern and Southern regions presented a higher prevalence. The prevalence in the elderly population ranged from 29.3% to 76.2% (pooled estimate 47.32%, 95% Cis 33.73 to 61.11). In addition, this population visited doctors more frequently, had more sleep disorders, and was more dependent on daily living activities. Almost fifty percent of both populations with chronic pain reported pain-induced disability. Conclusion: Chronic Pain is highly prevalent in Brazil and associated with significant distress, disability, and poorly controlled.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214061
10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100209
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214061
identifier_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100209
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214061/196292
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 100209
Clinics; v. 78 (2023); 100209
Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 100209
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222767447015424