Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214061 |
Resumo: | Objective: This review synthesized existing studies on the prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil and its associated factors to produce a recent estimation to guide public health politics. Methods: A search was carried out in the Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and BVS Regional/Lilacs databases to identify population-based cross-sectional studies from 2005 to 2020, which reported the prevalence of benign chronic pain in Brazil (more than three months). The risk of bias was assessed using design, sample size determination, and random selection as essential issues. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated for chronic pain in the general and elderly populations. The protocol was registered on Prospero (CRD42021249678). Results: Of the 682 identified, 15 macheted the authors’ inclusion criteria. Chronic pain prevalence in the general adult population ranged from 23.02% to 42.33% (pooled estimate 35.70%, 95% Cis 30.42 to 41.17) and was described as moderate to intense. It was associated with female sex, old age, lower education, intense professional activity, excessive alcohol consumption, smoking, central obesity, mood disorder, and sedentarism. The Southeastern and Southern regions presented a higher prevalence. The prevalence in the elderly population ranged from 29.3% to 76.2% (pooled estimate 47.32%, 95% Cis 33.73 to 61.11). In addition, this population visited doctors more frequently, had more sleep disorders, and was more dependent on daily living activities. Almost fifty percent of both populations with chronic pain reported pain-induced disability. Conclusion: Chronic Pain is highly prevalent in Brazil and associated with significant distress, disability, and poorly controlled. |
id |
USP-19_f658f9ae508b96e25cdc83039494e7c1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/214061 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysisChronic painPrevalenceRisk factorsSystematic reviewMeta-analysisObjective: This review synthesized existing studies on the prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil and its associated factors to produce a recent estimation to guide public health politics. Methods: A search was carried out in the Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and BVS Regional/Lilacs databases to identify population-based cross-sectional studies from 2005 to 2020, which reported the prevalence of benign chronic pain in Brazil (more than three months). The risk of bias was assessed using design, sample size determination, and random selection as essential issues. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated for chronic pain in the general and elderly populations. The protocol was registered on Prospero (CRD42021249678). Results: Of the 682 identified, 15 macheted the authors’ inclusion criteria. Chronic pain prevalence in the general adult population ranged from 23.02% to 42.33% (pooled estimate 35.70%, 95% Cis 30.42 to 41.17) and was described as moderate to intense. It was associated with female sex, old age, lower education, intense professional activity, excessive alcohol consumption, smoking, central obesity, mood disorder, and sedentarism. The Southeastern and Southern regions presented a higher prevalence. The prevalence in the elderly population ranged from 29.3% to 76.2% (pooled estimate 47.32%, 95% Cis 33.73 to 61.11). In addition, this population visited doctors more frequently, had more sleep disorders, and was more dependent on daily living activities. Almost fifty percent of both populations with chronic pain reported pain-induced disability. Conclusion: Chronic Pain is highly prevalent in Brazil and associated with significant distress, disability, and poorly controlled.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2023-05-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/21406110.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100209Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 100209Clinics; v. 78 (2023); 100209Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 1002091980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214061/196292Copyright (c) 2023 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantiago, Bruno Vitor MartinsOliveira, Ana Beatriz Garcez deSilva, Gabriel Machado Romão daSilva, Maxuel de Freitas daBergamo, Pedro ErnandesParise, MaudVillela, Nivaldo Ribeiro2023-07-06T13:05:36Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/214061Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-07-06T13:05:36Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis Santiago, Bruno Vitor Martins Chronic pain Prevalence Risk factors Systematic review Meta-analysis |
title_short |
Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Santiago, Bruno Vitor Martins |
author_facet |
Santiago, Bruno Vitor Martins Oliveira, Ana Beatriz Garcez de Silva, Gabriel Machado Romão da Silva, Maxuel de Freitas da Bergamo, Pedro Ernandes Parise, Maud Villela, Nivaldo Ribeiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Ana Beatriz Garcez de Silva, Gabriel Machado Romão da Silva, Maxuel de Freitas da Bergamo, Pedro Ernandes Parise, Maud Villela, Nivaldo Ribeiro |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santiago, Bruno Vitor Martins Oliveira, Ana Beatriz Garcez de Silva, Gabriel Machado Romão da Silva, Maxuel de Freitas da Bergamo, Pedro Ernandes Parise, Maud Villela, Nivaldo Ribeiro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chronic pain Prevalence Risk factors Systematic review Meta-analysis |
topic |
Chronic pain Prevalence Risk factors Systematic review Meta-analysis |
description |
Objective: This review synthesized existing studies on the prevalence of chronic pain in Brazil and its associated factors to produce a recent estimation to guide public health politics. Methods: A search was carried out in the Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and BVS Regional/Lilacs databases to identify population-based cross-sectional studies from 2005 to 2020, which reported the prevalence of benign chronic pain in Brazil (more than three months). The risk of bias was assessed using design, sample size determination, and random selection as essential issues. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated for chronic pain in the general and elderly populations. The protocol was registered on Prospero (CRD42021249678). Results: Of the 682 identified, 15 macheted the authors’ inclusion criteria. Chronic pain prevalence in the general adult population ranged from 23.02% to 42.33% (pooled estimate 35.70%, 95% Cis 30.42 to 41.17) and was described as moderate to intense. It was associated with female sex, old age, lower education, intense professional activity, excessive alcohol consumption, smoking, central obesity, mood disorder, and sedentarism. The Southeastern and Southern regions presented a higher prevalence. The prevalence in the elderly population ranged from 29.3% to 76.2% (pooled estimate 47.32%, 95% Cis 33.73 to 61.11). In addition, this population visited doctors more frequently, had more sleep disorders, and was more dependent on daily living activities. Almost fifty percent of both populations with chronic pain reported pain-induced disability. Conclusion: Chronic Pain is highly prevalent in Brazil and associated with significant distress, disability, and poorly controlled. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214061 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100209 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214061 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100209 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/214061/196292 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 100209 Clinics; v. 78 (2023); 100209 Clinics; Vol. 78 (2023); 100209 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222767447015424 |