Morality and homicide: a study about the transgressor’s action

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borges, Luciana Souza
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Alencar, Heloisa Moulin de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7198
Resumo: We investigated the judgments of representation of reality (JRR) and judgment of moral value (JMV) about transgressing actions, concerning the past and present time, of 20 homicidal men aged between 30 and 49 years. Individual interviews using the clinical piagetian method were carried out and the following were verified: the most cited JRR in the past was the one that they would commit the homicide again, due the suffered humiliation or the experienced negative feeling; in the present they reported they would not kill again due to the crime negative consequences, to their own or the victim's characteristics and life’s value; the JMV most mentioned in the past was the one that the action would be wrong due the negative consequences; in the present all of them considered wrong the committed homicides due to the negative consequences, value attributed to life and religious reasons. We expect that this discussion permit a deeper understanding of the homicidal individual so that universal principles such as respect for life can be taught and taken into consideration.
id USP-22_8faa630884706bbc2753909f0091e6df
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/7198
network_acronym_str USP-22
network_name_str Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Morality and homicide: a study about the transgressor’s action Moralidad y homicidio: un estudio sobre la acción del transgresor Moralidade e homicídio: um estudo sobre a ação do transgressor moraltransgressãohomicídiomoraltransgresiónhomicidiomoralitytransgressionhomicide We investigated the judgments of representation of reality (JRR) and judgment of moral value (JMV) about transgressing actions, concerning the past and present time, of 20 homicidal men aged between 30 and 49 years. Individual interviews using the clinical piagetian method were carried out and the following were verified: the most cited JRR in the past was the one that they would commit the homicide again, due the suffered humiliation or the experienced negative feeling; in the present they reported they would not kill again due to the crime negative consequences, to their own or the victim's characteristics and life’s value; the JMV most mentioned in the past was the one that the action would be wrong due the negative consequences; in the present all of them considered wrong the committed homicides due to the negative consequences, value attributed to life and religious reasons. We expect that this discussion permit a deeper understanding of the homicidal individual so that universal principles such as respect for life can be taught and taken into consideration. Investigamos juicios de representación de la realidad y valor moral de 20 hombres homicidas, con edades entre 30 y 49 años, sobre la acción transgresora, acerca del pasado y del presente. Realizamos entrevistas individuales, por el método clínico piagetiano, y verificamos que: el JRR (juicios de representación de la realidad) más citado en el pasado fue que cometerían nuevamente el homicidio, por la humillación sufrida o por el sentimiento negativo experimentado; en el presente mencionaron que no matarían nuevamente, debido a las consecuencias negativas del crimen, a las características propias o de la víctima y al valor de la vida; el JVM (juicios de valor moral) más mencionado en el pasado fue que la acción sería incorrecta, por las consecuencias negativas; en el presente todos juzgaron como incorrecto el homicidio cometido, debido a las consecuencias negativas, al valor atribuido a la vida y a motivos religiosos. Esperamos que esas discusiones posibiliten mayor comprensión del sujeto homicida, para que principios universales, como el respeto a la vida, se puedan considerar y enseñar. Investigamos juízos de representação da realidade e valor moral de 20 homens homicidas, com idade variando entre 30 e 49 anos, sobre a ação transgressora acerca do passado e do presente. Realizamos entrevistas individuais, pelo método clínico piagetiano, e verificamos que: o JRR (juízo de representação da realidade) mais citado no passado foi o de que cometeriam novamente o homicídio, pela humilhação sofrida ou pelo sentimento negativo experienciado; no presente mencionaram que não matariam de novo, devido às consequências negativas do crime, às características próprias ou da vítima e ao valor da vida; o JVM (juízo de valor moral) mais mencionado no passado foi o de que a ação seria errada, pelas consequências negativas; no presente todos julgaram como errado o homicídio cometido, devido às consequências negativas, ao valor atribuído à vida e a motivos religiosos. Esperamos que essas discussões possibilitem maior compreensão do sujeito homicida, para que princípios universais, como o respeito à vida, possam ser considerados e ensinados. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto2009-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/719810.1590/S0103-863X2009000300003Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 19 n. 44 (2009); 293-302 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 19 No. 44 (2009); 293-302 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 19 Núm. 44 (2009); 293-302 1982-43270103-863Xreponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7198/8681Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorges, Luciana SouzaAlencar, Heloisa Moulin de2012-05-03T17:29:38Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/7198Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideiaPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/oai||paideia@usp.br1982-43270103-863Xopendoar:2012-05-03T17:29:38Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Morality and homicide: a study about the transgressor’s action
Moralidad y homicidio: un estudio sobre la acción del transgresor
Moralidade e homicídio: um estudo sobre a ação do transgressor
title Morality and homicide: a study about the transgressor’s action
spellingShingle Morality and homicide: a study about the transgressor’s action
Borges, Luciana Souza
moral
transgressão
homicídio
moral
transgresión
homicidio
morality
transgression
homicide
title_short Morality and homicide: a study about the transgressor’s action
title_full Morality and homicide: a study about the transgressor’s action
title_fullStr Morality and homicide: a study about the transgressor’s action
title_full_unstemmed Morality and homicide: a study about the transgressor’s action
title_sort Morality and homicide: a study about the transgressor’s action
author Borges, Luciana Souza
author_facet Borges, Luciana Souza
Alencar, Heloisa Moulin de
author_role author
author2 Alencar, Heloisa Moulin de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borges, Luciana Souza
Alencar, Heloisa Moulin de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv moral
transgressão
homicídio
moral
transgresión
homicidio
morality
transgression
homicide
topic moral
transgressão
homicídio
moral
transgresión
homicidio
morality
transgression
homicide
description We investigated the judgments of representation of reality (JRR) and judgment of moral value (JMV) about transgressing actions, concerning the past and present time, of 20 homicidal men aged between 30 and 49 years. Individual interviews using the clinical piagetian method were carried out and the following were verified: the most cited JRR in the past was the one that they would commit the homicide again, due the suffered humiliation or the experienced negative feeling; in the present they reported they would not kill again due to the crime negative consequences, to their own or the victim's characteristics and life’s value; the JMV most mentioned in the past was the one that the action would be wrong due the negative consequences; in the present all of them considered wrong the committed homicides due to the negative consequences, value attributed to life and religious reasons. We expect that this discussion permit a deeper understanding of the homicidal individual so that universal principles such as respect for life can be taught and taken into consideration.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7198
10.1590/S0103-863X2009000300003
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7198
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-863X2009000300003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7198/8681
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 19 n. 44 (2009); 293-302
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 19 No. 44 (2009); 293-302
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 19 Núm. 44 (2009); 293-302
1982-4327
0103-863X
reponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
collection Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||paideia@usp.br
_version_ 1800221831791116288

Registros relacionados