Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Marta Lucia de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Schor, Néia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31939
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To identify the representations of contraceptive methods within a group of sterilized women, aiming at understanding the reasons why they refused those methods. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study was carried out on 31 sterilized women, randomly selected from a list of patients attending the Family Planning Program of a university hospital. Data was collected through a semi-structured interview. Interview transcription was analyzed according to the Content Analysis method. RESULTS: Refusal to other contraceptive methods was based on representations formed from a mixture of technical information received at health service units, their previous experiences with contraceptive methods and information received in the social environment. Rejection of high efficacy methods (hormonal and IUD) was mostly based on their low innocuousness; refusal to fertility awareness methods (calendar calculation, Billings ovulation method) was due to their low efficacy; and rejection of barrier methods (condom, diaphragm) was due to a culturally patterned sexuality full of interdictions as well as to their low efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The option for female sterilization may be indicative of the refusal to the contraceptive alternatives offered by health services. Reproductive health professionals should increase in their practice the knowledge about personal, socio-economic and cultural factors that affect women's choice of a contraceptive method that could guarantee a better control over their own reproductive life.
id USP-23_11f0802662f6670e312bdec3b0847beb
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/31939
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods Motivos de rejeição aos métodos contraceptivos reversíveis em mulheres esterilizadas Saúde da mulherAnticoncepção^i1^smétoEsterilização tubáriaConhecimentos^i1^satitudes e prática em saServiços de planejamento familiarEducação em saúdeMedicina reprodutivaWomen's healthContraception^i2^smethSterilizationtubalHealth knowledge^i2^sattitudespractFamily planning servicesHealth educationReproductive medicine OBJECTIVE: To identify the representations of contraceptive methods within a group of sterilized women, aiming at understanding the reasons why they refused those methods. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study was carried out on 31 sterilized women, randomly selected from a list of patients attending the Family Planning Program of a university hospital. Data was collected through a semi-structured interview. Interview transcription was analyzed according to the Content Analysis method. RESULTS: Refusal to other contraceptive methods was based on representations formed from a mixture of technical information received at health service units, their previous experiences with contraceptive methods and information received in the social environment. Rejection of high efficacy methods (hormonal and IUD) was mostly based on their low innocuousness; refusal to fertility awareness methods (calendar calculation, Billings ovulation method) was due to their low efficacy; and rejection of barrier methods (condom, diaphragm) was due to a culturally patterned sexuality full of interdictions as well as to their low efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The option for female sterilization may be indicative of the refusal to the contraceptive alternatives offered by health services. Reproductive health professionals should increase in their practice the knowledge about personal, socio-economic and cultural factors that affect women's choice of a contraceptive method that could guarantee a better control over their own reproductive life. OBJETIVO: Identificar as representações sobre os métodos contraceptivos que poderiam ser alternativas à esterilização, para um grupo de mulheres esterilizadas, visando a entender os motivos de rejeição a esses métodos. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de trabalho descritivo, qualitativo, cuja população estudada foi constituída por 31 mulheres esterilizadas, aleatoriamente selecionadas da listagem de pacientes atendidas pelo Programa de Planejamento Familiar de um ambulatório de um hospital universitário. As informações foram obtidas das mulheres estudadas por meio de entrevistas semi-estruturadas. As transcrições foram analisadas segundo o método de Análise de Conteúdo. RESULTADOS: A rejeição aos métodos contraceptivos esteve baseada em representações resultantes de informações técnicas recebidas em serviços de saúde, de vivências anteriores com esses métodos ou de informações recebidas do meio social. A rejeição aos métodos hormonais e DIU baseou-se principalmente em representações de baixa inocuidade; os métodos comportamentais (Tabela, Billings) foram rejeitados por representações de baixa eficácia; os métodos de barreira (diafragma e camisinha), por dificuldades no uso desses métodos relacionados a padrões culturais de exercício da sexualidade e representações de baixa eficácia. CONCLUSÕES: A opção pela esterilização feminina pode ser indicativa de rejeição às alternativas contraceptivas oferecidas pelos serviços de saúde. Os profissionais da área de saúde reprodutiva devem aprofundar seu conhecimento sobre os fatores pessoais, socioeconômicos e culturais que podem influenciar as mulheres na procura por um método contraceptivo que assegure maior controle de sua própria fecundidade. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2005-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3193910.1590/S0034-89102005000500014Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 No. 5 (2005); 788-794 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 Núm. 5 (2005); 788-794 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 5 (2005); 788-794 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31939/33931Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Marta Lucia de OliveiraSchor, Néia2012-07-08T22:47:03Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/31939Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-08T22:47:03Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods
Motivos de rejeição aos métodos contraceptivos reversíveis em mulheres esterilizadas
title Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods
spellingShingle Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods
Carvalho, Marta Lucia de Oliveira
Saúde da mulher
Anticoncepção^i1^sméto
Esterilização tubária
Conhecimentos^i1^satitudes e prática em sa
Serviços de planejamento familiar
Educação em saúde
Medicina reprodutiva
Women's health
Contraception^i2^smeth
Sterilization
tubal
Health knowledge^i2^sattitudes
pract
Family planning services
Health education
Reproductive medicine
title_short Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods
title_full Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods
title_fullStr Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods
title_full_unstemmed Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods
title_sort Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods
author Carvalho, Marta Lucia de Oliveira
author_facet Carvalho, Marta Lucia de Oliveira
Schor, Néia
author_role author
author2 Schor, Néia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Marta Lucia de Oliveira
Schor, Néia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Saúde da mulher
Anticoncepção^i1^sméto
Esterilização tubária
Conhecimentos^i1^satitudes e prática em sa
Serviços de planejamento familiar
Educação em saúde
Medicina reprodutiva
Women's health
Contraception^i2^smeth
Sterilization
tubal
Health knowledge^i2^sattitudes
pract
Family planning services
Health education
Reproductive medicine
topic Saúde da mulher
Anticoncepção^i1^sméto
Esterilização tubária
Conhecimentos^i1^satitudes e prática em sa
Serviços de planejamento familiar
Educação em saúde
Medicina reprodutiva
Women's health
Contraception^i2^smeth
Sterilization
tubal
Health knowledge^i2^sattitudes
pract
Family planning services
Health education
Reproductive medicine
description OBJECTIVE: To identify the representations of contraceptive methods within a group of sterilized women, aiming at understanding the reasons why they refused those methods. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study was carried out on 31 sterilized women, randomly selected from a list of patients attending the Family Planning Program of a university hospital. Data was collected through a semi-structured interview. Interview transcription was analyzed according to the Content Analysis method. RESULTS: Refusal to other contraceptive methods was based on representations formed from a mixture of technical information received at health service units, their previous experiences with contraceptive methods and information received in the social environment. Rejection of high efficacy methods (hormonal and IUD) was mostly based on their low innocuousness; refusal to fertility awareness methods (calendar calculation, Billings ovulation method) was due to their low efficacy; and rejection of barrier methods (condom, diaphragm) was due to a culturally patterned sexuality full of interdictions as well as to their low efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The option for female sterilization may be indicative of the refusal to the contraceptive alternatives offered by health services. Reproductive health professionals should increase in their practice the knowledge about personal, socio-economic and cultural factors that affect women's choice of a contraceptive method that could guarantee a better control over their own reproductive life.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31939
10.1590/S0034-89102005000500014
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31939
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-89102005000500014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31939/33931
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 No. 5 (2005); 788-794
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 Núm. 5 (2005); 788-794
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 5 (2005); 788-794
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221783764238336