Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31939 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To identify the representations of contraceptive methods within a group of sterilized women, aiming at understanding the reasons why they refused those methods. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study was carried out on 31 sterilized women, randomly selected from a list of patients attending the Family Planning Program of a university hospital. Data was collected through a semi-structured interview. Interview transcription was analyzed according to the Content Analysis method. RESULTS: Refusal to other contraceptive methods was based on representations formed from a mixture of technical information received at health service units, their previous experiences with contraceptive methods and information received in the social environment. Rejection of high efficacy methods (hormonal and IUD) was mostly based on their low innocuousness; refusal to fertility awareness methods (calendar calculation, Billings ovulation method) was due to their low efficacy; and rejection of barrier methods (condom, diaphragm) was due to a culturally patterned sexuality full of interdictions as well as to their low efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The option for female sterilization may be indicative of the refusal to the contraceptive alternatives offered by health services. Reproductive health professionals should increase in their practice the knowledge about personal, socio-economic and cultural factors that affect women's choice of a contraceptive method that could guarantee a better control over their own reproductive life. |
id |
USP-23_11f0802662f6670e312bdec3b0847beb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/31939 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods Motivos de rejeição aos métodos contraceptivos reversíveis em mulheres esterilizadas Saúde da mulherAnticoncepção^i1^smétoEsterilização tubáriaConhecimentos^i1^satitudes e prática em saServiços de planejamento familiarEducação em saúdeMedicina reprodutivaWomen's healthContraception^i2^smethSterilizationtubalHealth knowledge^i2^sattitudespractFamily planning servicesHealth educationReproductive medicine OBJECTIVE: To identify the representations of contraceptive methods within a group of sterilized women, aiming at understanding the reasons why they refused those methods. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study was carried out on 31 sterilized women, randomly selected from a list of patients attending the Family Planning Program of a university hospital. Data was collected through a semi-structured interview. Interview transcription was analyzed according to the Content Analysis method. RESULTS: Refusal to other contraceptive methods was based on representations formed from a mixture of technical information received at health service units, their previous experiences with contraceptive methods and information received in the social environment. Rejection of high efficacy methods (hormonal and IUD) was mostly based on their low innocuousness; refusal to fertility awareness methods (calendar calculation, Billings ovulation method) was due to their low efficacy; and rejection of barrier methods (condom, diaphragm) was due to a culturally patterned sexuality full of interdictions as well as to their low efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The option for female sterilization may be indicative of the refusal to the contraceptive alternatives offered by health services. Reproductive health professionals should increase in their practice the knowledge about personal, socio-economic and cultural factors that affect women's choice of a contraceptive method that could guarantee a better control over their own reproductive life. OBJETIVO: Identificar as representações sobre os métodos contraceptivos que poderiam ser alternativas à esterilização, para um grupo de mulheres esterilizadas, visando a entender os motivos de rejeição a esses métodos. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de trabalho descritivo, qualitativo, cuja população estudada foi constituída por 31 mulheres esterilizadas, aleatoriamente selecionadas da listagem de pacientes atendidas pelo Programa de Planejamento Familiar de um ambulatório de um hospital universitário. As informações foram obtidas das mulheres estudadas por meio de entrevistas semi-estruturadas. As transcrições foram analisadas segundo o método de Análise de Conteúdo. RESULTADOS: A rejeição aos métodos contraceptivos esteve baseada em representações resultantes de informações técnicas recebidas em serviços de saúde, de vivências anteriores com esses métodos ou de informações recebidas do meio social. A rejeição aos métodos hormonais e DIU baseou-se principalmente em representações de baixa inocuidade; os métodos comportamentais (Tabela, Billings) foram rejeitados por representações de baixa eficácia; os métodos de barreira (diafragma e camisinha), por dificuldades no uso desses métodos relacionados a padrões culturais de exercício da sexualidade e representações de baixa eficácia. CONCLUSÕES: A opção pela esterilização feminina pode ser indicativa de rejeição às alternativas contraceptivas oferecidas pelos serviços de saúde. Os profissionais da área de saúde reprodutiva devem aprofundar seu conhecimento sobre os fatores pessoais, socioeconômicos e culturais que podem influenciar as mulheres na procura por um método contraceptivo que assegure maior controle de sua própria fecundidade. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2005-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3193910.1590/S0034-89102005000500014Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 No. 5 (2005); 788-794 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 Núm. 5 (2005); 788-794 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 5 (2005); 788-794 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31939/33931Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Marta Lucia de OliveiraSchor, Néia2012-07-08T22:47:03Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/31939Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-08T22:47:03Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods Motivos de rejeição aos métodos contraceptivos reversíveis em mulheres esterilizadas |
title |
Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods |
spellingShingle |
Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods Carvalho, Marta Lucia de Oliveira Saúde da mulher Anticoncepção^i1^sméto Esterilização tubária Conhecimentos^i1^satitudes e prática em sa Serviços de planejamento familiar Educação em saúde Medicina reprodutiva Women's health Contraception^i2^smeth Sterilization tubal Health knowledge^i2^sattitudes pract Family planning services Health education Reproductive medicine |
title_short |
Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods |
title_full |
Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods |
title_fullStr |
Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods |
title_sort |
Reasons why sterilized women refused reversive contraceptive methods |
author |
Carvalho, Marta Lucia de Oliveira |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Marta Lucia de Oliveira Schor, Néia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schor, Néia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Marta Lucia de Oliveira Schor, Néia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Saúde da mulher Anticoncepção^i1^sméto Esterilização tubária Conhecimentos^i1^satitudes e prática em sa Serviços de planejamento familiar Educação em saúde Medicina reprodutiva Women's health Contraception^i2^smeth Sterilization tubal Health knowledge^i2^sattitudes pract Family planning services Health education Reproductive medicine |
topic |
Saúde da mulher Anticoncepção^i1^sméto Esterilização tubária Conhecimentos^i1^satitudes e prática em sa Serviços de planejamento familiar Educação em saúde Medicina reprodutiva Women's health Contraception^i2^smeth Sterilization tubal Health knowledge^i2^sattitudes pract Family planning services Health education Reproductive medicine |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To identify the representations of contraceptive methods within a group of sterilized women, aiming at understanding the reasons why they refused those methods. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study was carried out on 31 sterilized women, randomly selected from a list of patients attending the Family Planning Program of a university hospital. Data was collected through a semi-structured interview. Interview transcription was analyzed according to the Content Analysis method. RESULTS: Refusal to other contraceptive methods was based on representations formed from a mixture of technical information received at health service units, their previous experiences with contraceptive methods and information received in the social environment. Rejection of high efficacy methods (hormonal and IUD) was mostly based on their low innocuousness; refusal to fertility awareness methods (calendar calculation, Billings ovulation method) was due to their low efficacy; and rejection of barrier methods (condom, diaphragm) was due to a culturally patterned sexuality full of interdictions as well as to their low efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The option for female sterilization may be indicative of the refusal to the contraceptive alternatives offered by health services. Reproductive health professionals should increase in their practice the knowledge about personal, socio-economic and cultural factors that affect women's choice of a contraceptive method that could guarantee a better control over their own reproductive life. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31939 10.1590/S0034-89102005000500014 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31939 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-89102005000500014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31939/33931 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 No. 5 (2005); 788-794 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 Núm. 5 (2005); 788-794 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 5 (2005); 788-794 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221783764238336 |