Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moreira, Taís de Campos
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Signor, Luciana, Figueiró, Luciana Rizzieri, Fernandes, Simone, Bortolon, Cassandra Borges, Benchaya, Mariana Canellas, Ferigolo, Maristela, Barros, Helena MT
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401
Resumo: OBJECTIVE To estimate rates of non-adherence to telemedicine strategies aimed at treating drug addiction. METHODS A systematic review was conducted of randomized controlled trials investigating different telemedicine treatment methods for drug addiction. The following databases were consulted between May 18, 2012 and June 21, 2012: PubMed, PsycINFO, SciELO, Wiley (The Cochrane Library), Embase, Clinical trials and Google Scholar. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The criteria evaluated were: appropriate sequence of data generation, allocation concealment, blinding, description of losses and exclusions and analysis by intention to treat. There were 274 studies selected, of which 20 were analyzed. RESULTS Non-adherence rates varied between 15.0% and 70.0%. The interventions evaluated were of at least three months duration and, although they all used telemedicine as support, treatment methods differed. Regarding the quality of the studies, the values also varied from very poor to high quality. High quality studies showed better adherence rates, as did those using more than one technique of intervention and a limited treatment time. Mono-user studies showed better adherence rates than poly-user studies. CONCLUSIONS Rates of non-adherence to treatment involving telemedicine on the part of users of psycho-active substances differed considerably, depending on the country, the intervention method, follow-up time and substances used. Using more than one technique of intervention, short duration of treatment and the type of substance used by patients appear to facilitate adherence.
id USP-23_2c9be715793260c126b88a06141d9442
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/84401
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review Não adesão em intervenções por telemedicina para usuários de drogas: revisão sistemática OBJECTIVE To estimate rates of non-adherence to telemedicine strategies aimed at treating drug addiction. METHODS A systematic review was conducted of randomized controlled trials investigating different telemedicine treatment methods for drug addiction. The following databases were consulted between May 18, 2012 and June 21, 2012: PubMed, PsycINFO, SciELO, Wiley (The Cochrane Library), Embase, Clinical trials and Google Scholar. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The criteria evaluated were: appropriate sequence of data generation, allocation concealment, blinding, description of losses and exclusions and analysis by intention to treat. There were 274 studies selected, of which 20 were analyzed. RESULTS Non-adherence rates varied between 15.0% and 70.0%. The interventions evaluated were of at least three months duration and, although they all used telemedicine as support, treatment methods differed. Regarding the quality of the studies, the values also varied from very poor to high quality. High quality studies showed better adherence rates, as did those using more than one technique of intervention and a limited treatment time. Mono-user studies showed better adherence rates than poly-user studies. CONCLUSIONS Rates of non-adherence to treatment involving telemedicine on the part of users of psycho-active substances differed considerably, depending on the country, the intervention method, follow-up time and substances used. Using more than one technique of intervention, short duration of treatment and the type of substance used by patients appear to facilitate adherence. OBJETIVO Estimar taxas de não adesão em intervenções com estratégias de telemedicina para tratamento de dependência química. MÉTODOS Foi realizada revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados com diferentes métodos terapêuticos de dependência química que incluíam telemedicina. Foram consultadas as bases de dados PubMed, PsycINFO, SciELO, Wiley (The Cochrane Library), Embase e Clinical Trials e a plataforma Google Scholar no período de 18/4/2012 a 21/6/2012. Para avaliar a qualidade dos estudos, utilizou-se a escala Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation . Os critérios avaliados foram: adequada sequência da geração de dados, ocultação da alocação, cegamento, descrição das perdas e exclusões e análises por intenção de tratar. Foram selecionados 274 estudos, dos quais 20 foram analisados. RESULTADOS As taxas de não adesão variaram entre 15,0% e 70,0%. As intervenções avaliadas possuíam no mínimo três meses de intervenção e, embora todos utilizassem a telemedicina como apoio, os métodos de tratamentos foram diferentes. Em relação à qualidade dos estudos, os valores também variaram entre muito baixa qualidade e alta qualidade. Os estudos com qualidade alta demonstraram maiores taxas de adesão, bem como aqueles que utilizaram mais de uma técnica de intervenção e tempo limitado de tratamento. Estudos com monousuários apontaram maiores taxas de adesão que estudos com poliusuários. CONCLUSÕES As taxas de não adesão a tratamentos para usuários de substâncias psicoativas por meio de telemedicina apresentaram consideráveis diferenças, dependendo do país, método da intervenção, tempo de seguimento e substâncias utilizadas. O uso de mais de uma técnica de intervenção, tempo curto de tratamento e o tipo de substância utilizada pelos pacientes parecem facilitar a adesão. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/8440110.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005130Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2014); 521-531Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 3 (2014); 521-531Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 48 n. 3 (2014); 521-5311518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401/87192https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401/87193Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira, Taís de Campos Signor, Luciana Figueiró, Luciana Rizzieri Fernandes, Simone Bortolon, Cassandra Borges Benchaya, Mariana Canellas Ferigolo, Maristela Barros, Helena MT 2014-09-03T18:50:46Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/84401Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2014-09-03T18:50:46Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review
Não adesão em intervenções por telemedicina para usuários de drogas: revisão sistemática
title Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review
spellingShingle Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review
Moreira, Taís de Campos
title_short Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review
title_full Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review
title_fullStr Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review
title_sort Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review
author Moreira, Taís de Campos
author_facet Moreira, Taís de Campos
Signor, Luciana
Figueiró, Luciana Rizzieri
Fernandes, Simone
Bortolon, Cassandra Borges
Benchaya, Mariana Canellas
Ferigolo, Maristela
Barros, Helena MT
author_role author
author2 Signor, Luciana
Figueiró, Luciana Rizzieri
Fernandes, Simone
Bortolon, Cassandra Borges
Benchaya, Mariana Canellas
Ferigolo, Maristela
Barros, Helena MT
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moreira, Taís de Campos
Signor, Luciana
Figueiró, Luciana Rizzieri
Fernandes, Simone
Bortolon, Cassandra Borges
Benchaya, Mariana Canellas
Ferigolo, Maristela
Barros, Helena MT
description OBJECTIVE To estimate rates of non-adherence to telemedicine strategies aimed at treating drug addiction. METHODS A systematic review was conducted of randomized controlled trials investigating different telemedicine treatment methods for drug addiction. The following databases were consulted between May 18, 2012 and June 21, 2012: PubMed, PsycINFO, SciELO, Wiley (The Cochrane Library), Embase, Clinical trials and Google Scholar. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The criteria evaluated were: appropriate sequence of data generation, allocation concealment, blinding, description of losses and exclusions and analysis by intention to treat. There were 274 studies selected, of which 20 were analyzed. RESULTS Non-adherence rates varied between 15.0% and 70.0%. The interventions evaluated were of at least three months duration and, although they all used telemedicine as support, treatment methods differed. Regarding the quality of the studies, the values also varied from very poor to high quality. High quality studies showed better adherence rates, as did those using more than one technique of intervention and a limited treatment time. Mono-user studies showed better adherence rates than poly-user studies. CONCLUSIONS Rates of non-adherence to treatment involving telemedicine on the part of users of psycho-active substances differed considerably, depending on the country, the intervention method, follow-up time and substances used. Using more than one technique of intervention, short duration of treatment and the type of substance used by patients appear to facilitate adherence.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401
10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005130
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005130
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401/87192
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401/87193
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2014); 521-531
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 3 (2014); 521-531
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 48 n. 3 (2014); 521-531
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221795836493824