Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
DOI: | 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005130 |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE To estimate rates of non-adherence to telemedicine strategies aimed at treating drug addiction. METHODS A systematic review was conducted of randomized controlled trials investigating different telemedicine treatment methods for drug addiction. The following databases were consulted between May 18, 2012 and June 21, 2012: PubMed, PsycINFO, SciELO, Wiley (The Cochrane Library), Embase, Clinical trials and Google Scholar. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The criteria evaluated were: appropriate sequence of data generation, allocation concealment, blinding, description of losses and exclusions and analysis by intention to treat. There were 274 studies selected, of which 20 were analyzed. RESULTS Non-adherence rates varied between 15.0% and 70.0%. The interventions evaluated were of at least three months duration and, although they all used telemedicine as support, treatment methods differed. Regarding the quality of the studies, the values also varied from very poor to high quality. High quality studies showed better adherence rates, as did those using more than one technique of intervention and a limited treatment time. Mono-user studies showed better adherence rates than poly-user studies. CONCLUSIONS Rates of non-adherence to treatment involving telemedicine on the part of users of psycho-active substances differed considerably, depending on the country, the intervention method, follow-up time and substances used. Using more than one technique of intervention, short duration of treatment and the type of substance used by patients appear to facilitate adherence. |
id |
USP-23_2c9be715793260c126b88a06141d9442 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/84401 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
spelling |
Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review Não adesão em intervenções por telemedicina para usuários de drogas: revisão sistemática OBJECTIVE To estimate rates of non-adherence to telemedicine strategies aimed at treating drug addiction. METHODS A systematic review was conducted of randomized controlled trials investigating different telemedicine treatment methods for drug addiction. The following databases were consulted between May 18, 2012 and June 21, 2012: PubMed, PsycINFO, SciELO, Wiley (The Cochrane Library), Embase, Clinical trials and Google Scholar. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The criteria evaluated were: appropriate sequence of data generation, allocation concealment, blinding, description of losses and exclusions and analysis by intention to treat. There were 274 studies selected, of which 20 were analyzed. RESULTS Non-adherence rates varied between 15.0% and 70.0%. The interventions evaluated were of at least three months duration and, although they all used telemedicine as support, treatment methods differed. Regarding the quality of the studies, the values also varied from very poor to high quality. High quality studies showed better adherence rates, as did those using more than one technique of intervention and a limited treatment time. Mono-user studies showed better adherence rates than poly-user studies. CONCLUSIONS Rates of non-adherence to treatment involving telemedicine on the part of users of psycho-active substances differed considerably, depending on the country, the intervention method, follow-up time and substances used. Using more than one technique of intervention, short duration of treatment and the type of substance used by patients appear to facilitate adherence. OBJETIVO Estimar taxas de não adesão em intervenções com estratégias de telemedicina para tratamento de dependência química. MÉTODOS Foi realizada revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados com diferentes métodos terapêuticos de dependência química que incluíam telemedicina. Foram consultadas as bases de dados PubMed, PsycINFO, SciELO, Wiley (The Cochrane Library), Embase e Clinical Trials e a plataforma Google Scholar no período de 18/4/2012 a 21/6/2012. Para avaliar a qualidade dos estudos, utilizou-se a escala Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation . Os critérios avaliados foram: adequada sequência da geração de dados, ocultação da alocação, cegamento, descrição das perdas e exclusões e análises por intenção de tratar. Foram selecionados 274 estudos, dos quais 20 foram analisados. RESULTADOS As taxas de não adesão variaram entre 15,0% e 70,0%. As intervenções avaliadas possuíam no mínimo três meses de intervenção e, embora todos utilizassem a telemedicina como apoio, os métodos de tratamentos foram diferentes. Em relação à qualidade dos estudos, os valores também variaram entre muito baixa qualidade e alta qualidade. Os estudos com qualidade alta demonstraram maiores taxas de adesão, bem como aqueles que utilizaram mais de uma técnica de intervenção e tempo limitado de tratamento. Estudos com monousuários apontaram maiores taxas de adesão que estudos com poliusuários. CONCLUSÕES As taxas de não adesão a tratamentos para usuários de substâncias psicoativas por meio de telemedicina apresentaram consideráveis diferenças, dependendo do país, método da intervenção, tempo de seguimento e substâncias utilizadas. O uso de mais de uma técnica de intervenção, tempo curto de tratamento e o tipo de substância utilizada pelos pacientes parecem facilitar a adesão. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/8440110.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005130Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2014); 521-531Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 3 (2014); 521-531Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 48 n. 3 (2014); 521-5311518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401/87192https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401/87193Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira, Taís de Campos Signor, Luciana Figueiró, Luciana Rizzieri Fernandes, Simone Bortolon, Cassandra Borges Benchaya, Mariana Canellas Ferigolo, Maristela Barros, Helena MT 2014-09-03T18:50:46Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/84401Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2014-09-03T18:50:46Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review Não adesão em intervenções por telemedicina para usuários de drogas: revisão sistemática |
title |
Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review Moreira, Taís de Campos Moreira, Taís de Campos |
title_short |
Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review |
title_full |
Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review |
title_sort |
Non-adherence to telemedicine interventions for drug users: systematic review |
author |
Moreira, Taís de Campos |
author_facet |
Moreira, Taís de Campos Moreira, Taís de Campos Signor, Luciana Figueiró, Luciana Rizzieri Fernandes, Simone Bortolon, Cassandra Borges Benchaya, Mariana Canellas Ferigolo, Maristela Barros, Helena MT Signor, Luciana Figueiró, Luciana Rizzieri Fernandes, Simone Bortolon, Cassandra Borges Benchaya, Mariana Canellas Ferigolo, Maristela Barros, Helena MT |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Signor, Luciana Figueiró, Luciana Rizzieri Fernandes, Simone Bortolon, Cassandra Borges Benchaya, Mariana Canellas Ferigolo, Maristela Barros, Helena MT |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moreira, Taís de Campos Signor, Luciana Figueiró, Luciana Rizzieri Fernandes, Simone Bortolon, Cassandra Borges Benchaya, Mariana Canellas Ferigolo, Maristela Barros, Helena MT |
description |
OBJECTIVE To estimate rates of non-adherence to telemedicine strategies aimed at treating drug addiction. METHODS A systematic review was conducted of randomized controlled trials investigating different telemedicine treatment methods for drug addiction. The following databases were consulted between May 18, 2012 and June 21, 2012: PubMed, PsycINFO, SciELO, Wiley (The Cochrane Library), Embase, Clinical trials and Google Scholar. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The criteria evaluated were: appropriate sequence of data generation, allocation concealment, blinding, description of losses and exclusions and analysis by intention to treat. There were 274 studies selected, of which 20 were analyzed. RESULTS Non-adherence rates varied between 15.0% and 70.0%. The interventions evaluated were of at least three months duration and, although they all used telemedicine as support, treatment methods differed. Regarding the quality of the studies, the values also varied from very poor to high quality. High quality studies showed better adherence rates, as did those using more than one technique of intervention and a limited treatment time. Mono-user studies showed better adherence rates than poly-user studies. CONCLUSIONS Rates of non-adherence to treatment involving telemedicine on the part of users of psycho-active substances differed considerably, depending on the country, the intervention method, follow-up time and substances used. Using more than one technique of intervention, short duration of treatment and the type of substance used by patients appear to facilitate adherence. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005130 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005130 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401/87192 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/84401/87193 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2014); 521-531 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 3 (2014); 521-531 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 48 n. 3 (2014); 521-531 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1822181730639937536 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005130 |