Explicit discrimination and health: development and psychometric properties of an assessment instrument
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/33102 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument to assess discrimination effects on health outcomes and behaviors, capable of distinguishing harmful differential treatment effects from their interpretation as discriminatory events. METHODS: Successive versions of an instrument were developed based on a systematic review of instruments assessing racial discrimination, focus groups and review by a panel comprising seven experts. The instrument was refined using cognitive interviews and pilot-testing. The final version of the instrument was administered to 424 undergraduate college students in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, in 2010. Structural dimensionality, two types of reliability and construct validity were analyzed. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis corroborated the hypothesis of the instrument's unidimensionality, and seven experts verified its face and content validity. The internal consistency was 0.8, and test-retest reliability was higher than 0.5 for 14 out of 18 items. The overall score was higher among socially disadvantaged individuals and correlated with adverse health behaviors/conditions, particularly when differential treatments were attributed to discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the validity and reliability of the instrument developed. The proposed instrument enables the investigation of novel aspects of the relationship between discrimination and health. |
id |
USP-23_31a6aa1fddcfd18418b460c522d4c493 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/33102 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Explicit discrimination and health: development and psychometric properties of an assessment instrument Discriminación explícita y salud: desarrollo y propiedades psicométricas de un instrumento Discriminação explícita e saúde: desenvolvimento e propriedades psicométricas de um instrumento PreconceitoRelações InterpessoaisFatores SocioeconômicosDesigualdades em SaúdePrejuicioRelaciones InterpersonalesFactores SocioeconómicosDesigualdades en la SaludPrejudiceInterpersonal RelationsSocioeconomic FactorsHealth Inequalities OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument to assess discrimination effects on health outcomes and behaviors, capable of distinguishing harmful differential treatment effects from their interpretation as discriminatory events. METHODS: Successive versions of an instrument were developed based on a systematic review of instruments assessing racial discrimination, focus groups and review by a panel comprising seven experts. The instrument was refined using cognitive interviews and pilot-testing. The final version of the instrument was administered to 424 undergraduate college students in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, in 2010. Structural dimensionality, two types of reliability and construct validity were analyzed. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis corroborated the hypothesis of the instrument's unidimensionality, and seven experts verified its face and content validity. The internal consistency was 0.8, and test-retest reliability was higher than 0.5 for 14 out of 18 items. The overall score was higher among socially disadvantaged individuals and correlated with adverse health behaviors/conditions, particularly when differential treatments were attributed to discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the validity and reliability of the instrument developed. The proposed instrument enables the investigation of novel aspects of the relationship between discrimination and health. OBJETIVO: Desarrollar instrumento para evaluar los efectos de experiencias discriminatorias sobre condiciones y comportamientos en salud, distinguiendo efectos patológicos de la exposición a tratamientos diferenciales de su interpretación como eventos discriminatorios. MÉTODOS: Versiones sucesivas del instrumento fueron elaboradas con base en una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre escalas de discriminación, grupos focales y apreciación por un panel de siete especialistas. El refinamiento del instrumento fue alcanzado por medio de entrevistas cognitivas y estudio piloto, de modo que la versión final fue aplicada en 424 estudiantes de pregrado en Rio de Janeiro, sureste de Brasil, en 2010. La estructura dimensional, dos tipos de confiabilidad y validez del constructo fueron evaluadas. RESULTADOS: El análisis factorial exploratorio corroboró la hipótesis de unidimensionalidad del instrumento y siete especialistas indicaron que el presentaba validez de orientación y contenido. La consistencia interna fue de 0,8 y la confiabilidad de la prueba y re-evaluación fue mayor a 0,5 para 14 de los 18 itens. El escore general fue más alto en individuos socialmente desafortunados y se asoció con comportamientos/condiciones de salud adversos, especialmente al considerarse tratamientos atribuidos a la discriminación. CONCLUSIONES: Estos resultados sugieren validez y confiabilidad del instrumento desarrollado. La escala presentada permitirá investigar aspectos innovadores de las relaciones entre discriminación y salud. OBJETIVO: Desenvolver instrumento para avaliar os efeitos de experiências discriminatórias sobre condições e comportamentos em saúde, capaz de distinguir efeitos patológicos da exposição a tratamentos diferenciais de sua interpretação como eventos discriminatórios. MÉTODOS: Versões sucessivas do instrumento foram elaboradas com base em uma revisão sistemática da literatura sobre escalas de discriminação, grupos focais e apreciação por um painel de sete especialistas. O refinamento do instrumento foi atingido por meio de entrevistas cognitivas e estudo-piloto, de modo que sua versão final foi aplicada em 424 estudantes de graduação no Rio de Janeiro, RJ, em 2010. A estrutura dimensional, dois tipos de confiabilidade e validade de construto foram avaliadas. RESULTADOS: A análise fatorial exploratória corroborou a hipótese de unidimensionalidade do instrumento e sete especialistas indicaram que este apresentava validade de face e conteúdo. A consistência interna foi de 0,8 e a confiabilidade teste-reteste foi maior do que 0,5 para 14 dos 18 itens. O escore foi estatisticamente mais alto em indivíduos socialmente desprivilegiados e associou-se com comportamentos/condições de saúde adversos, especialmente quando tratamentos atribuídos à discriminação foram considerados. CONCLUSÕES: Estes resultados sugerem validade e confiabilidade do instrumento desenvolvido. A escala apresentada permitirá investigar aspectos inovadores das relações entre discriminação e saúde. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2012-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3310210.1590/S0034-89102012000200009Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2012); 269-278 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 46 Núm. 2 (2012); 269-278 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 46 n. 2 (2012); 269-278 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/33102/35819Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBastos, João LuizFaerstein, EduardoCeleste, Roger KellerBarros, Aluisio J D2012-07-11T23:10:38Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/33102Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-11T23:10:38Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Explicit discrimination and health: development and psychometric properties of an assessment instrument Discriminación explícita y salud: desarrollo y propiedades psicométricas de un instrumento Discriminação explícita e saúde: desenvolvimento e propriedades psicométricas de um instrumento |
title |
Explicit discrimination and health: development and psychometric properties of an assessment instrument |
spellingShingle |
Explicit discrimination and health: development and psychometric properties of an assessment instrument Bastos, João Luiz Preconceito Relações Interpessoais Fatores Socioeconômicos Desigualdades em Saúde Prejuicio Relaciones Interpersonales Factores Socioeconómicos Desigualdades en la Salud Prejudice Interpersonal Relations Socioeconomic Factors Health Inequalities |
title_short |
Explicit discrimination and health: development and psychometric properties of an assessment instrument |
title_full |
Explicit discrimination and health: development and psychometric properties of an assessment instrument |
title_fullStr |
Explicit discrimination and health: development and psychometric properties of an assessment instrument |
title_full_unstemmed |
Explicit discrimination and health: development and psychometric properties of an assessment instrument |
title_sort |
Explicit discrimination and health: development and psychometric properties of an assessment instrument |
author |
Bastos, João Luiz |
author_facet |
Bastos, João Luiz Faerstein, Eduardo Celeste, Roger Keller Barros, Aluisio J D |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Faerstein, Eduardo Celeste, Roger Keller Barros, Aluisio J D |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bastos, João Luiz Faerstein, Eduardo Celeste, Roger Keller Barros, Aluisio J D |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Preconceito Relações Interpessoais Fatores Socioeconômicos Desigualdades em Saúde Prejuicio Relaciones Interpersonales Factores Socioeconómicos Desigualdades en la Salud Prejudice Interpersonal Relations Socioeconomic Factors Health Inequalities |
topic |
Preconceito Relações Interpessoais Fatores Socioeconômicos Desigualdades em Saúde Prejuicio Relaciones Interpersonales Factores Socioeconómicos Desigualdades en la Salud Prejudice Interpersonal Relations Socioeconomic Factors Health Inequalities |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument to assess discrimination effects on health outcomes and behaviors, capable of distinguishing harmful differential treatment effects from their interpretation as discriminatory events. METHODS: Successive versions of an instrument were developed based on a systematic review of instruments assessing racial discrimination, focus groups and review by a panel comprising seven experts. The instrument was refined using cognitive interviews and pilot-testing. The final version of the instrument was administered to 424 undergraduate college students in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, in 2010. Structural dimensionality, two types of reliability and construct validity were analyzed. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis corroborated the hypothesis of the instrument's unidimensionality, and seven experts verified its face and content validity. The internal consistency was 0.8, and test-retest reliability was higher than 0.5 for 14 out of 18 items. The overall score was higher among socially disadvantaged individuals and correlated with adverse health behaviors/conditions, particularly when differential treatments were attributed to discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the validity and reliability of the instrument developed. The proposed instrument enables the investigation of novel aspects of the relationship between discrimination and health. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/33102 10.1590/S0034-89102012000200009 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/33102 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-89102012000200009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/33102/35819 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2012); 269-278 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 46 Núm. 2 (2012); 269-278 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 46 n. 2 (2012); 269-278 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221792772554752 |