Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102019000100257 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of alternatives for rehabilitation treatment of mandibular edentulism in the context of the Brazilian Unified Health System (implant-supported total dental prosthesis versus conventional total dental prosthesis). METHODS A Markov model was developed to capture long-term clinical and economic outcomes. The model’s population was comprised of a hypothetical cohort of 1,000,000 patients, aged 55 years, with total mandibular edentulism and without medical contraindications for performing surgical procedures. The adopted analysis perspective was that of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Based on the proposed model, we calculated cost – in BRL, and effectiveness – measured by quality-adjusted prosthesis year (QAPY). The time horizon of the analysis was 20 years. RESULTS Considering a 5% discount in costs and effects, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of implant-supported total dental prostheses compared to conventional total dental prosthesis (BRL 464.22/QAPY) was lower than the willingness to pay threshold adopted in the model (BRL 3,050.00/QAPY). CONCLUSIONS The results of this economic analysis showed that the rehabilitation of mandibular edentulous patients by implant-supported total prosthesis is very cost-effective when compared to conventional complete prosthesis, considering the cost-effectiveness limits employed. |
id |
USP-23_460984b2a2760830afac78dfa98e595f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-89102019000100257 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesisJaw, Edentulous, rehabilitationDental Prosthesis, economicsCost-Effectiveness EvaluationUnified Health SystemABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of alternatives for rehabilitation treatment of mandibular edentulism in the context of the Brazilian Unified Health System (implant-supported total dental prosthesis versus conventional total dental prosthesis). METHODS A Markov model was developed to capture long-term clinical and economic outcomes. The model’s population was comprised of a hypothetical cohort of 1,000,000 patients, aged 55 years, with total mandibular edentulism and without medical contraindications for performing surgical procedures. The adopted analysis perspective was that of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Based on the proposed model, we calculated cost – in BRL, and effectiveness – measured by quality-adjusted prosthesis year (QAPY). The time horizon of the analysis was 20 years. RESULTS Considering a 5% discount in costs and effects, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of implant-supported total dental prostheses compared to conventional total dental prosthesis (BRL 464.22/QAPY) was lower than the willingness to pay threshold adopted in the model (BRL 3,050.00/QAPY). CONCLUSIONS The results of this economic analysis showed that the rehabilitation of mandibular edentulous patients by implant-supported total prosthesis is very cost-effective when compared to conventional complete prosthesis, considering the cost-effectiveness limits employed.Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102019000100257Revista de Saúde Pública v.53 2019reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001066info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessProbst,Livia FernandesVanni,TazioCavalcante,Denise de Fátima BarrosSilva,Erica Tatiane daCavalcanti,Yuri WanderleyPasseri,Luis AugustoPereira,Antonio Carloseng2019-08-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-89102019000100257Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-8910&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2019-08-16T00:00Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis |
title |
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis |
spellingShingle |
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis Probst,Livia Fernandes Jaw, Edentulous, rehabilitation Dental Prosthesis, economics Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation Unified Health System |
title_short |
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis |
title_full |
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis |
title_fullStr |
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis |
title_sort |
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis |
author |
Probst,Livia Fernandes |
author_facet |
Probst,Livia Fernandes Vanni,Tazio Cavalcante,Denise de Fátima Barros Silva,Erica Tatiane da Cavalcanti,Yuri Wanderley Passeri,Luis Augusto Pereira,Antonio Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vanni,Tazio Cavalcante,Denise de Fátima Barros Silva,Erica Tatiane da Cavalcanti,Yuri Wanderley Passeri,Luis Augusto Pereira,Antonio Carlos |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Probst,Livia Fernandes Vanni,Tazio Cavalcante,Denise de Fátima Barros Silva,Erica Tatiane da Cavalcanti,Yuri Wanderley Passeri,Luis Augusto Pereira,Antonio Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Jaw, Edentulous, rehabilitation Dental Prosthesis, economics Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation Unified Health System |
topic |
Jaw, Edentulous, rehabilitation Dental Prosthesis, economics Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation Unified Health System |
description |
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of alternatives for rehabilitation treatment of mandibular edentulism in the context of the Brazilian Unified Health System (implant-supported total dental prosthesis versus conventional total dental prosthesis). METHODS A Markov model was developed to capture long-term clinical and economic outcomes. The model’s population was comprised of a hypothetical cohort of 1,000,000 patients, aged 55 years, with total mandibular edentulism and without medical contraindications for performing surgical procedures. The adopted analysis perspective was that of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Based on the proposed model, we calculated cost – in BRL, and effectiveness – measured by quality-adjusted prosthesis year (QAPY). The time horizon of the analysis was 20 years. RESULTS Considering a 5% discount in costs and effects, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of implant-supported total dental prostheses compared to conventional total dental prosthesis (BRL 464.22/QAPY) was lower than the willingness to pay threshold adopted in the model (BRL 3,050.00/QAPY). CONCLUSIONS The results of this economic analysis showed that the rehabilitation of mandibular edentulous patients by implant-supported total prosthesis is very cost-effective when compared to conventional complete prosthesis, considering the cost-effectiveness limits employed. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102019000100257 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102019000100257 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001066 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública v.53 2019 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1748936505246613504 |