Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1986 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
DOI: | 10.1590/S0034-89101986000600003 |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/23388 |
Resumo: | This work is an attempt to throw more light on the pathogenicity of microorganisms of the vaginal flora, specially those of the so-called nonspecific vaginitis. An attempt is made to determine the value of cytology as a method for the identification of vaginal flora, by the study of microbiologic cultures, fresh and Gram stain direct exam and citology of the cervico-vaginal specimens of 97 patients. Among microorganisms with clinical significance, Gardnerella vaginalis was the most frequently isolated organism, 48,4%, followed by Trichomonas vaginalis, 10.3%, Candida albicans, 7.2% and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, 1.1%. Cytologic changes typical of cervicitis and/or vaginitis were seen in the majority of cases of G. vaginalis, C. albicans, and in all cases of T.vaginalis. The importance of a semi-quantitative evaluation of the vaginal flora on the culture plates was stressed. In the evaluation of cytology as a diagnostic method of the vaginal microflora, we observed that it was the best of the two methods used in the identification of T.vaginalis and that it was capable of detecting the presence of about 50% of C.albicans. In the diagnosis of G. vaginalis cytology was positive in 48.9% of cases. It is of note that of 31 cases of positive cytologic smear, eight had negative culture for G. vaginalis, even though organisms such as Haemophilus sp or Corynebacterium sp had been isolated in these cases. |
id |
USP-23_4f6ae4969b265336e13bca4b836acf4a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/23388 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
spelling |
Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects Flora vaginal e correlação com aspectos citológicos Vagina^i1^smicrobioloVagina^i1^scitoloVaginite^i1^sdiagnóstCervicite^i1^sdiagnóstVagina^i2^smicrobiolVagina^i2^scitolVaginitis^i2^sdiagnoCervicitis^i2^sdiagno This work is an attempt to throw more light on the pathogenicity of microorganisms of the vaginal flora, specially those of the so-called nonspecific vaginitis. An attempt is made to determine the value of cytology as a method for the identification of vaginal flora, by the study of microbiologic cultures, fresh and Gram stain direct exam and citology of the cervico-vaginal specimens of 97 patients. Among microorganisms with clinical significance, Gardnerella vaginalis was the most frequently isolated organism, 48,4%, followed by Trichomonas vaginalis, 10.3%, Candida albicans, 7.2% and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, 1.1%. Cytologic changes typical of cervicitis and/or vaginitis were seen in the majority of cases of G. vaginalis, C. albicans, and in all cases of T.vaginalis. The importance of a semi-quantitative evaluation of the vaginal flora on the culture plates was stressed. In the evaluation of cytology as a diagnostic method of the vaginal microflora, we observed that it was the best of the two methods used in the identification of T.vaginalis and that it was capable of detecting the presence of about 50% of C.albicans. In the diagnosis of G. vaginalis cytology was positive in 48.9% of cases. It is of note that of 31 cases of positive cytologic smear, eight had negative culture for G. vaginalis, even though organisms such as Haemophilus sp or Corynebacterium sp had been isolated in these cases. Com a finalidade de esclarecer a patogenicidade de microorganismos que compõem a microflora vaginal, particularmente nas chamadas vaginites inespecíficas e de determinar o valor da citologia como método para identificação da flora vaginal, foram estudadas 97 pacientes, realizando cultura, exame direto a fresco, Gram e citologia do material cérvico-vaginal. Entre os microorganismos de importância clínica reconhecida, Gardnerella vaginalis foi o mais freqüentemente isolado, 48,4%, seguido de Trichomonas vaginalis, 10,3%, Candida albicans, 7,2% e Neisseria gonorrhoeae, 1,1%. Alterações citológicas indicativas de cervicite e/ou vaginite estiveram presentes na maioria dos casos de G.vaginalis, C.albicans e em todos os casos de T.vaginalis. Foi ressaltada a importância da avaliação semi-quantitativa dos microorganismos nos meios de cultura. Na avaliação da citologia como método diagnóstico para a microflora vaginal, foi observada que este foi o melhor dos métodos utilizados na identificação de T.vaginalis, tendo sido detectado cerca de 50% dos casos de C.albicans. No diagnóstico de G.vaginalis a citologia foi positiva em 48,9% dos casos, destacando-se que dos 31 casos positivos ao exame citológico, oito tiveram culturas negativas para G.vaginalis, embora tenham sido isolados nestes últimos: Haemophilus sp. ou Corynebacterium sp. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública1986-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/2338810.1590/S0034-89101986000600003Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 20 No. 6 (1986); 415-420 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 20 Núm. 6 (1986); 415-420 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 20 n. 6 (1986); 415-420 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/23388/25420Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuerreiro, Hygia Maria NunesBarbosa, Helenemarie SchaerConceição Filho, João LycioTishchenko, Lúcia MariaHagge, Suraia2012-05-28T16:25:58Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/23388Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-05-28T16:25:58Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects Flora vaginal e correlação com aspectos citológicos |
title |
Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects |
spellingShingle |
Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects Guerreiro, Hygia Maria Nunes Vagina^i1^smicrobiolo Vagina^i1^scitolo Vaginite^i1^sdiagnóst Cervicite^i1^sdiagnóst Vagina^i2^smicrobiol Vagina^i2^scitol Vaginitis^i2^sdiagno Cervicitis^i2^sdiagno Guerreiro, Hygia Maria Nunes Vagina^i1^smicrobiolo Vagina^i1^scitolo Vaginite^i1^sdiagnóst Cervicite^i1^sdiagnóst Vagina^i2^smicrobiol Vagina^i2^scitol Vaginitis^i2^sdiagno Cervicitis^i2^sdiagno |
title_short |
Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects |
title_full |
Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects |
title_fullStr |
Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects |
title_sort |
Vaginal flora and correlation with cytological aspects |
author |
Guerreiro, Hygia Maria Nunes |
author_facet |
Guerreiro, Hygia Maria Nunes Guerreiro, Hygia Maria Nunes Barbosa, Helenemarie Schaer Conceição Filho, João Lycio Tishchenko, Lúcia Maria Hagge, Suraia Barbosa, Helenemarie Schaer Conceição Filho, João Lycio Tishchenko, Lúcia Maria Hagge, Suraia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barbosa, Helenemarie Schaer Conceição Filho, João Lycio Tishchenko, Lúcia Maria Hagge, Suraia |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guerreiro, Hygia Maria Nunes Barbosa, Helenemarie Schaer Conceição Filho, João Lycio Tishchenko, Lúcia Maria Hagge, Suraia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vagina^i1^smicrobiolo Vagina^i1^scitolo Vaginite^i1^sdiagnóst Cervicite^i1^sdiagnóst Vagina^i2^smicrobiol Vagina^i2^scitol Vaginitis^i2^sdiagno Cervicitis^i2^sdiagno |
topic |
Vagina^i1^smicrobiolo Vagina^i1^scitolo Vaginite^i1^sdiagnóst Cervicite^i1^sdiagnóst Vagina^i2^smicrobiol Vagina^i2^scitol Vaginitis^i2^sdiagno Cervicitis^i2^sdiagno |
description |
This work is an attempt to throw more light on the pathogenicity of microorganisms of the vaginal flora, specially those of the so-called nonspecific vaginitis. An attempt is made to determine the value of cytology as a method for the identification of vaginal flora, by the study of microbiologic cultures, fresh and Gram stain direct exam and citology of the cervico-vaginal specimens of 97 patients. Among microorganisms with clinical significance, Gardnerella vaginalis was the most frequently isolated organism, 48,4%, followed by Trichomonas vaginalis, 10.3%, Candida albicans, 7.2% and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, 1.1%. Cytologic changes typical of cervicitis and/or vaginitis were seen in the majority of cases of G. vaginalis, C. albicans, and in all cases of T.vaginalis. The importance of a semi-quantitative evaluation of the vaginal flora on the culture plates was stressed. In the evaluation of cytology as a diagnostic method of the vaginal microflora, we observed that it was the best of the two methods used in the identification of T.vaginalis and that it was capable of detecting the presence of about 50% of C.albicans. In the diagnosis of G. vaginalis cytology was positive in 48.9% of cases. It is of note that of 31 cases of positive cytologic smear, eight had negative culture for G. vaginalis, even though organisms such as Haemophilus sp or Corynebacterium sp had been isolated in these cases. |
publishDate |
1986 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1986-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/23388 10.1590/S0034-89101986000600003 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/23388 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-89101986000600003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/23388/25420 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 20 No. 6 (1986); 415-420 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 20 Núm. 6 (1986); 415-420 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 20 n. 6 (1986); 415-420 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1822179135543312384 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-89101986000600003 |