Validity of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire as morbidity measurement tool
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2002 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/25341 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: To validate the Portuguese version of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), and to evaluate the relationship between musculoskeletal morbidity and demographic, occupational and behavior variables. METHODS: Ninety government bank employees were interviewed using the Portuguese version of NMQ in Brasilia, Brazil, in 1999. The respondents' answers were compared to clinical data found in their medical records. Descriptive and associative variable analyses were carried out. Comparative statistical analysis was performed using Student t-test and Pearson's test was applied for correlational analysis. RESULTS: The results revealed an 86% agreement rate between symptoms reported in the NMQ and the respondent's clinical history. There were found differences in symptoms prevalence for the variables gender, occupation and physical activity. Women showed a higher severity average of symptoms for almost all body anatomical regions; managers reported greater severity of symptoms in the lumbar area than clerks; physical activity was associated to the lowest severity of symptoms in upper extremities. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the Portuguese NMQ version includes a good validity indicator and is satisfactory as a musculoskeletal morbidity measurement tool. However, there is a need of (1) more items to measure the severity of symptoms; and (2) changes in scale layout in order to make it more easily understandable and less prone to avoidable missing data. |
id |
USP-23_57c42b969e9fc53faba78cac95a4aef1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/25341 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Validity of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire as morbidity measurement tool Validação do Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares como medida de morbidade Transtornos traumáticos cumulativos^i1^sepidemioloQuestionáriosValidadeMensuraçãoQuestionário Nórdico de Sintomas OsteomuscularesCumulative trauma disorders^i2^sepidemiolQuestionnairesValidityMeasurementNordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire OBJECTIVES: To validate the Portuguese version of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), and to evaluate the relationship between musculoskeletal morbidity and demographic, occupational and behavior variables. METHODS: Ninety government bank employees were interviewed using the Portuguese version of NMQ in Brasilia, Brazil, in 1999. The respondents' answers were compared to clinical data found in their medical records. Descriptive and associative variable analyses were carried out. Comparative statistical analysis was performed using Student t-test and Pearson's test was applied for correlational analysis. RESULTS: The results revealed an 86% agreement rate between symptoms reported in the NMQ and the respondent's clinical history. There were found differences in symptoms prevalence for the variables gender, occupation and physical activity. Women showed a higher severity average of symptoms for almost all body anatomical regions; managers reported greater severity of symptoms in the lumbar area than clerks; physical activity was associated to the lowest severity of symptoms in upper extremities. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the Portuguese NMQ version includes a good validity indicator and is satisfactory as a musculoskeletal morbidity measurement tool. However, there is a need of (1) more items to measure the severity of symptoms; and (2) changes in scale layout in order to make it more easily understandable and less prone to avoidable missing data. OBJETIVO: Validar a versão brasileira do Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire -- NMQ (Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares -- QNSO) e apresentar as relações entre morbidade osteomuscular e variáveis demográficas, ocupacionais e relativas a hábitos. MÉTODOS: A versão brasileira do instrumento NMQ foi aplicada a uma amostra de 90 empregados em uma instituição bancária estatal, em Brasília, em 1999. Foram realizadas análises descritivas da amostra e de associação entre as variáveis. Os resultados foram comparados a dados relativos à história clínica de cada respondente. Realizou-se análise estatística de comparação entre grupos (Test t) e de correlação entre variáveis (Pearson). RESULTADOS: Os resultados mostraram concordância entre o relato de sintomas no NMQ e a história clínica em 86% dos casos. Foram verificadas diferenças na prevalência de sintomas quanto ao gênero, à função exercida e à prática de atividade física. As mulheres apresentaram maior média de severidade de sintomas em quase todas as regiões anatômicas; os gerentes relataram maior severidade de sintomas em região lombar do que escriturários; a prática de atividade física regular esteve associada à menor severidade de sintomas em membros superiores. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados mostram um bom índice de validade concorrente para a versão brasileira do NMQ e recomendam sua utilização como medida de morbidade osteomuscular. Entretanto, o instrumento necessita de uma medida de severidade de sintomas e de alterações na diagramação e no conteúdo da escala para torná-la mais compreensível e menos suscetível a um excessivo número de respostas em branco. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2002-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/2534110.1590/S0034-89102002000300008Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 36 No. 3 (2002); 307-312 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 36 Núm. 3 (2002); 307-312 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 36 n. 3 (2002); 307-312 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/25341/27086Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinheiro, Fernanda AmaralTróccoli, Bartholomeu TorresCarvalho, Cláudio Viveiros de2012-05-29T19:24:17Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/25341Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-05-29T19:24:17Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validity of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire as morbidity measurement tool Validação do Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares como medida de morbidade |
title |
Validity of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire as morbidity measurement tool |
spellingShingle |
Validity of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire as morbidity measurement tool Pinheiro, Fernanda Amaral Transtornos traumáticos cumulativos^i1^sepidemiolo Questionários Validade Mensuração Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares Cumulative trauma disorders^i2^sepidemiol Questionnaires Validity Measurement Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire |
title_short |
Validity of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire as morbidity measurement tool |
title_full |
Validity of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire as morbidity measurement tool |
title_fullStr |
Validity of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire as morbidity measurement tool |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire as morbidity measurement tool |
title_sort |
Validity of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire as morbidity measurement tool |
author |
Pinheiro, Fernanda Amaral |
author_facet |
Pinheiro, Fernanda Amaral Tróccoli, Bartholomeu Torres Carvalho, Cláudio Viveiros de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tróccoli, Bartholomeu Torres Carvalho, Cláudio Viveiros de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinheiro, Fernanda Amaral Tróccoli, Bartholomeu Torres Carvalho, Cláudio Viveiros de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Transtornos traumáticos cumulativos^i1^sepidemiolo Questionários Validade Mensuração Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares Cumulative trauma disorders^i2^sepidemiol Questionnaires Validity Measurement Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire |
topic |
Transtornos traumáticos cumulativos^i1^sepidemiolo Questionários Validade Mensuração Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares Cumulative trauma disorders^i2^sepidemiol Questionnaires Validity Measurement Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire |
description |
OBJECTIVES: To validate the Portuguese version of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), and to evaluate the relationship between musculoskeletal morbidity and demographic, occupational and behavior variables. METHODS: Ninety government bank employees were interviewed using the Portuguese version of NMQ in Brasilia, Brazil, in 1999. The respondents' answers were compared to clinical data found in their medical records. Descriptive and associative variable analyses were carried out. Comparative statistical analysis was performed using Student t-test and Pearson's test was applied for correlational analysis. RESULTS: The results revealed an 86% agreement rate between symptoms reported in the NMQ and the respondent's clinical history. There were found differences in symptoms prevalence for the variables gender, occupation and physical activity. Women showed a higher severity average of symptoms for almost all body anatomical regions; managers reported greater severity of symptoms in the lumbar area than clerks; physical activity was associated to the lowest severity of symptoms in upper extremities. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the Portuguese NMQ version includes a good validity indicator and is satisfactory as a musculoskeletal morbidity measurement tool. However, there is a need of (1) more items to measure the severity of symptoms; and (2) changes in scale layout in order to make it more easily understandable and less prone to avoidable missing data. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/25341 10.1590/S0034-89102002000300008 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/25341 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-89102002000300008 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/25341/27086 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 36 No. 3 (2002); 307-312 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 36 Núm. 3 (2002); 307-312 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 36 n. 3 (2002); 307-312 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221779998801920 |