Burnout en el personal de un hospital de crónicos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng spa |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/145562 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of Burnout in a medium or long-stay hospital, to monitor its evolution and to highlight the importance of cut-off points used to avoid distortions in the interpretation of the results. METHODS: Two cross-sectional studies (2013–2016) were carried out, applying the Spanish version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory to the staff of a chronic care hospital (n = 323). Result variables were: Burnout prevalence and a high degree of affectation of the subscales and predictor variables: sociodemographic characteristics and factors that trigger and modulate the syndrome. The association between variables was quantified using odds ratio. RESULTS: The participation rate went from 31.5% to 39.3%. The professionals presented a mean level of Burnout in both moments, observing a lower degree of affectation of the depersonalization subscales and personal accomplishment in the 2016 cut-off. The average score of the subscales in 2016 was 21.5 for emotional fatigue, 4.7 for depersonalization and 41.7 for personal fulfillment, compared to the values of emotional fatigue = 21.6, depersonalization = 6.9 and personal fulfillment = 36.3 obtained in 2013. The emotional fatigue score was slightly higher than the mean value of the national studies (19.9), while the rest of the values were similar to the mean values of the studies considered. The prevalence of Burnout and the interpretation of the results varied significantly according to the cut-off points considered. In both studies, sociodemographic variables showed little significance, while social support and interpersonal relationships were associated with the degree of burnout among professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Our prevalence of Burnout was similar to that of other studies consulted, although the emotional component is more marked in our environment. The interpretation of the results varied significantly according to the cut-off points applied, due to the cross-cultural differences. |
id |
USP-23_65211eb959be7a64d5bf4a99225bbb0a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/145562 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Burnout en el personal de un hospital de crónicosBurnout in the staff of a chronic care hospitalBurnoutProfessionalclassification. Patient Care Team. HospitalsPublicmanpower. Working Conditions. Socioeconomic Factors.Agotamiento Profesionalclasificación. Grupo de Atención al Paciente. Hospitales PúblicosRecursos Humanos. Condiciones de Trabajo. Factores Socioeconómicos.OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of Burnout in a medium or long-stay hospital, to monitor its evolution and to highlight the importance of cut-off points used to avoid distortions in the interpretation of the results. METHODS: Two cross-sectional studies (2013–2016) were carried out, applying the Spanish version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory to the staff of a chronic care hospital (n = 323). Result variables were: Burnout prevalence and a high degree of affectation of the subscales and predictor variables: sociodemographic characteristics and factors that trigger and modulate the syndrome. The association between variables was quantified using odds ratio. RESULTS: The participation rate went from 31.5% to 39.3%. The professionals presented a mean level of Burnout in both moments, observing a lower degree of affectation of the depersonalization subscales and personal accomplishment in the 2016 cut-off. The average score of the subscales in 2016 was 21.5 for emotional fatigue, 4.7 for depersonalization and 41.7 for personal fulfillment, compared to the values of emotional fatigue = 21.6, depersonalization = 6.9 and personal fulfillment = 36.3 obtained in 2013. The emotional fatigue score was slightly higher than the mean value of the national studies (19.9), while the rest of the values were similar to the mean values of the studies considered. The prevalence of Burnout and the interpretation of the results varied significantly according to the cut-off points considered. In both studies, sociodemographic variables showed little significance, while social support and interpersonal relationships were associated with the degree of burnout among professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Our prevalence of Burnout was similar to that of other studies consulted, although the emotional component is more marked in our environment. The interpretation of the results varied significantly according to the cut-off points applied, due to the cross-cultural differences.OBJETIVO: Estimar la prevalencia de Burnout en un hospital de media-larga estancia, monitorizar su evolución y evidenciar la importancia de los puntos de corte utilizados para evitar sesgos en la interpretación de los resultados. MÉTODOS: Se realizaron dos estudios transversales (2013–2016), aplicando la versión española del cuestionario Maslach Burnout Inventory al personal de un hospital de crónicos (n = 323). Fueron variables resultado: prevalencia de Burnout y alto grado de afectación de las subescalas y variables predictoras: características sociodemográficas y factores desencadenantes y moduladores del síndrome. La asociación entre variables se cuantificó mediante odds ratio. RESULTADOS: El índice de participación pasó del 31,5% al 39,3%. Los profesionales presentaron un nivel medio de Burnout en ambos momentos, observándose menor grado de afectación de las subescalas de despersonalización y realización personal en el corte realizado en 2016. La puntuación media de las subescalas en 2016 fue 21,5 para el cansancio emocional, 4,7 para la despersonalización y 41,7 para la realización personal, frente a los valores de cansancio emocional = 21,6, despersonalización = 6,9 y realización personal = 36,3 obtenidos en 2013. La puntuación de la escala de cansancio emocional fue ligeramente superior al valor promedio de los estudios nacionales (19,9), mientras que el resto de valores fueron similares a los valores promedio de los estudios considerados. La prevalencia de Burnout y la interpretación de los resultados variaron significativamente en función de los puntos de corte considerados. En ambos estudios, las variables sociodemográficas mostraron escasa significación, mientras que el apoyo social y las relaciones interpersonales se asociaron al grado de Burnout de los profesionales. CONCLUSIONES: Nuestra prevalencia de Burnout fue similar a la de otros estudios consultados, aunque el componente emocional es más marcado en nuestro medio. La interpretación de los resultados varió significativamente en función de los puntos de corte aplicados, debido a las diferencias transculturales.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2018-04-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/14556210.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000242Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 45Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 45Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 52 (2018); 451518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengspahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/145562/139547https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/145562/139548https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/145562/148324Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMerino-Plaza, Maria JoseCarrera-Hueso, Francisco JavierArribas-Boscá, NuriaMartínez-Asensi, AmparoTrull-Maravilla, EmiliaFikri-Benbrahim, Narjis2018-07-20T11:44:52Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/145562Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2018-07-20T11:44:52Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Burnout en el personal de un hospital de crónicos Burnout in the staff of a chronic care hospital |
title |
Burnout en el personal de un hospital de crónicos |
spellingShingle |
Burnout en el personal de un hospital de crónicos Merino-Plaza, Maria Jose Burnout Professional classification. Patient Care Team. Hospitals Public manpower. Working Conditions. Socioeconomic Factors. Agotamiento Profesional clasificación. Grupo de Atención al Paciente. Hospitales Públicos Recursos Humanos. Condiciones de Trabajo. Factores Socioeconómicos. |
title_short |
Burnout en el personal de un hospital de crónicos |
title_full |
Burnout en el personal de un hospital de crónicos |
title_fullStr |
Burnout en el personal de un hospital de crónicos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Burnout en el personal de un hospital de crónicos |
title_sort |
Burnout en el personal de un hospital de crónicos |
author |
Merino-Plaza, Maria Jose |
author_facet |
Merino-Plaza, Maria Jose Carrera-Hueso, Francisco Javier Arribas-Boscá, Nuria Martínez-Asensi, Amparo Trull-Maravilla, Emilia Fikri-Benbrahim, Narjis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carrera-Hueso, Francisco Javier Arribas-Boscá, Nuria Martínez-Asensi, Amparo Trull-Maravilla, Emilia Fikri-Benbrahim, Narjis |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Merino-Plaza, Maria Jose Carrera-Hueso, Francisco Javier Arribas-Boscá, Nuria Martínez-Asensi, Amparo Trull-Maravilla, Emilia Fikri-Benbrahim, Narjis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Burnout Professional classification. Patient Care Team. Hospitals Public manpower. Working Conditions. Socioeconomic Factors. Agotamiento Profesional clasificación. Grupo de Atención al Paciente. Hospitales Públicos Recursos Humanos. Condiciones de Trabajo. Factores Socioeconómicos. |
topic |
Burnout Professional classification. Patient Care Team. Hospitals Public manpower. Working Conditions. Socioeconomic Factors. Agotamiento Profesional clasificación. Grupo de Atención al Paciente. Hospitales Públicos Recursos Humanos. Condiciones de Trabajo. Factores Socioeconómicos. |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of Burnout in a medium or long-stay hospital, to monitor its evolution and to highlight the importance of cut-off points used to avoid distortions in the interpretation of the results. METHODS: Two cross-sectional studies (2013–2016) were carried out, applying the Spanish version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory to the staff of a chronic care hospital (n = 323). Result variables were: Burnout prevalence and a high degree of affectation of the subscales and predictor variables: sociodemographic characteristics and factors that trigger and modulate the syndrome. The association between variables was quantified using odds ratio. RESULTS: The participation rate went from 31.5% to 39.3%. The professionals presented a mean level of Burnout in both moments, observing a lower degree of affectation of the depersonalization subscales and personal accomplishment in the 2016 cut-off. The average score of the subscales in 2016 was 21.5 for emotional fatigue, 4.7 for depersonalization and 41.7 for personal fulfillment, compared to the values of emotional fatigue = 21.6, depersonalization = 6.9 and personal fulfillment = 36.3 obtained in 2013. The emotional fatigue score was slightly higher than the mean value of the national studies (19.9), while the rest of the values were similar to the mean values of the studies considered. The prevalence of Burnout and the interpretation of the results varied significantly according to the cut-off points considered. In both studies, sociodemographic variables showed little significance, while social support and interpersonal relationships were associated with the degree of burnout among professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Our prevalence of Burnout was similar to that of other studies consulted, although the emotional component is more marked in our environment. The interpretation of the results varied significantly according to the cut-off points applied, due to the cross-cultural differences. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-04-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/145562 10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000242 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/145562 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000242 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng spa |
language |
eng spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/145562/139547 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/145562/139548 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/145562/148324 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 45 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 45 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 52 (2018); 45 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221799771799552 |