Quality of life in adults from a rural area in Southern Brazil: a population-based study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bortolotto,Caroline Cardozo
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Mola,Christian Loret de, Tovo-Rodrigues,Luciana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000200501
Resumo: ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the quality of life and its determinants in a population living in a rural area. METHODS This is a population-based, cross-sectional study with individuals aged 18 years or over from the rural area of Pelotas, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. We evaluated quality of life using the WHOQOL-BREF, which has four domains (physical, psychological, social relations, and environment) and two questions: overall quality of life and satisfaction with health. We considered as independent variables the demographic, socioeconomic, and health variables. We evaluated the associations using linear regression in the four domains and ordinal logistic regression in the two general questions on quality of life and satisfaction with health. RESULTS The sample consisted of 1,479 individuals. The prevalence of the perception of overall very poor quality of life and dissatisfaction with health were 22.5% and 26.3%, respectively. Individuals who were older (p < 0.001), non-white (p = 0.004), with lower education level (p < 0.001), poorer (p = 0.001), and who had always lived in the rural area (p = 0.049) were less likely to have a better perception of overall quality of life. As for satisfaction with health, women (p = 0.001), older individuals (p = 0.001), those unemployed (p = 0.023), and those with diseases were less likely to report higher satisfaction with health. For the four domains evaluated, the results were consistent with those observed for the general questions. CONCLUSIONS The most relevant aspects that negatively defined the quality of life of the population were being a woman, older, non-white, having a low income, having a lower education level, having always lived in the rural area, being unemployed, and having a disease. Given that they are significant factors as determinants of health, these results suggest that quality of life is an issue that should be placed among health needs, especially regarding the most vulnerable groups in rural areas.
id USP-23_70663fe99324839133f9baa4af2dee1e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-89102018000200501
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of life in adults from a rural area in Southern Brazil: a population-based studyAdultQuality of LifeSocioeconomic FactorsGender and HealthRural PopulationABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the quality of life and its determinants in a population living in a rural area. METHODS This is a population-based, cross-sectional study with individuals aged 18 years or over from the rural area of Pelotas, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. We evaluated quality of life using the WHOQOL-BREF, which has four domains (physical, psychological, social relations, and environment) and two questions: overall quality of life and satisfaction with health. We considered as independent variables the demographic, socioeconomic, and health variables. We evaluated the associations using linear regression in the four domains and ordinal logistic regression in the two general questions on quality of life and satisfaction with health. RESULTS The sample consisted of 1,479 individuals. The prevalence of the perception of overall very poor quality of life and dissatisfaction with health were 22.5% and 26.3%, respectively. Individuals who were older (p < 0.001), non-white (p = 0.004), with lower education level (p < 0.001), poorer (p = 0.001), and who had always lived in the rural area (p = 0.049) were less likely to have a better perception of overall quality of life. As for satisfaction with health, women (p = 0.001), older individuals (p = 0.001), those unemployed (p = 0.023), and those with diseases were less likely to report higher satisfaction with health. For the four domains evaluated, the results were consistent with those observed for the general questions. CONCLUSIONS The most relevant aspects that negatively defined the quality of life of the population were being a woman, older, non-white, having a low income, having a lower education level, having always lived in the rural area, being unemployed, and having a disease. Given that they are significant factors as determinants of health, these results suggest that quality of life is an issue that should be placed among health needs, especially regarding the most vulnerable groups in rural areas.Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000200501Revista de Saúde Pública v.52 suppl.1 2018reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000261info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBortolotto,Caroline CardozoMola,Christian Loret deTovo-Rodrigues,Lucianaeng2018-10-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-89102018000200501Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-8910&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2018-10-02T00:00Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of life in adults from a rural area in Southern Brazil: a population-based study
title Quality of life in adults from a rural area in Southern Brazil: a population-based study
spellingShingle Quality of life in adults from a rural area in Southern Brazil: a population-based study
Bortolotto,Caroline Cardozo
Adult
Quality of Life
Socioeconomic Factors
Gender and Health
Rural Population
title_short Quality of life in adults from a rural area in Southern Brazil: a population-based study
title_full Quality of life in adults from a rural area in Southern Brazil: a population-based study
title_fullStr Quality of life in adults from a rural area in Southern Brazil: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Quality of life in adults from a rural area in Southern Brazil: a population-based study
title_sort Quality of life in adults from a rural area in Southern Brazil: a population-based study
author Bortolotto,Caroline Cardozo
author_facet Bortolotto,Caroline Cardozo
Mola,Christian Loret de
Tovo-Rodrigues,Luciana
author_role author
author2 Mola,Christian Loret de
Tovo-Rodrigues,Luciana
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bortolotto,Caroline Cardozo
Mola,Christian Loret de
Tovo-Rodrigues,Luciana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adult
Quality of Life
Socioeconomic Factors
Gender and Health
Rural Population
topic Adult
Quality of Life
Socioeconomic Factors
Gender and Health
Rural Population
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the quality of life and its determinants in a population living in a rural area. METHODS This is a population-based, cross-sectional study with individuals aged 18 years or over from the rural area of Pelotas, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. We evaluated quality of life using the WHOQOL-BREF, which has four domains (physical, psychological, social relations, and environment) and two questions: overall quality of life and satisfaction with health. We considered as independent variables the demographic, socioeconomic, and health variables. We evaluated the associations using linear regression in the four domains and ordinal logistic regression in the two general questions on quality of life and satisfaction with health. RESULTS The sample consisted of 1,479 individuals. The prevalence of the perception of overall very poor quality of life and dissatisfaction with health were 22.5% and 26.3%, respectively. Individuals who were older (p < 0.001), non-white (p = 0.004), with lower education level (p < 0.001), poorer (p = 0.001), and who had always lived in the rural area (p = 0.049) were less likely to have a better perception of overall quality of life. As for satisfaction with health, women (p = 0.001), older individuals (p = 0.001), those unemployed (p = 0.023), and those with diseases were less likely to report higher satisfaction with health. For the four domains evaluated, the results were consistent with those observed for the general questions. CONCLUSIONS The most relevant aspects that negatively defined the quality of life of the population were being a woman, older, non-white, having a low income, having a lower education level, having always lived in the rural area, being unemployed, and having a disease. Given that they are significant factors as determinants of health, these results suggest that quality of life is an issue that should be placed among health needs, especially regarding the most vulnerable groups in rural areas.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000200501
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000200501
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000261
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública v.52 suppl.1 2018
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1748936504818794496