Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Brazilian elderly

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Batistoni, Samila Sather Tavares
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Neri, Anita Liberalesso, Cupertino, Ana Paula F Bretas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32272
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To obtain internal construct and criteria validity for the Center of Epidemiological Studies - Depression scale in elderly people. METHODS: The instrument was applied to 903 elderly living in a city in southeastern Brazil, between 2002 and 2003. Results were compared with the Brazilian version of the CES-D applied to a sub-sample of 446 participants. Internal consistency of the two scales was assessed using Cronbach's alpha measured for the items in their total and for the items of each factor obtained for the assessed instrument. To assess the construct validity, the 20 items underwent exploratory factorial analysis to discover their variation pattern and the variance explained according to each factor. RESULTS: The scale presented satisfactory index for internal validity (alpha=0.860), sensibility (74.6%), specificity (73.6%), and for cutoff point >;11. However, it presented a relatively high frequency of false positives compared to the GDS 33.8% vs. 15%. Exploratory factorial analysis of the instrument created factorial structure with three factors: negative affects, problems initiating behaviors, and positive affects. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument seemed to be psychometrically suitable when applied to older people. However, further cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, carried out in different contexts, may explain the effects of somatic and situational variables on the results of the instrument in older people.
id USP-23_7d7cf81d43c9a2655195356e75085ccb
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/32272
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Brazilian elderly Validade da escala de depressão do Center for Epidemiological Studies entre idosos brasileiros IdososDepressão^i1^sdiagnóstDepressão^i1^spsicoloEstudos de validaçãoOlder peopleDepression^i2^sdiagnoDepression^i2^spsycholValidation studies OBJECTIVE: To obtain internal construct and criteria validity for the Center of Epidemiological Studies - Depression scale in elderly people. METHODS: The instrument was applied to 903 elderly living in a city in southeastern Brazil, between 2002 and 2003. Results were compared with the Brazilian version of the CES-D applied to a sub-sample of 446 participants. Internal consistency of the two scales was assessed using Cronbach's alpha measured for the items in their total and for the items of each factor obtained for the assessed instrument. To assess the construct validity, the 20 items underwent exploratory factorial analysis to discover their variation pattern and the variance explained according to each factor. RESULTS: The scale presented satisfactory index for internal validity (alpha=0.860), sensibility (74.6%), specificity (73.6%), and for cutoff point >;11. However, it presented a relatively high frequency of false positives compared to the GDS 33.8% vs. 15%. Exploratory factorial analysis of the instrument created factorial structure with three factors: negative affects, problems initiating behaviors, and positive affects. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument seemed to be psychometrically suitable when applied to older people. However, further cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, carried out in different contexts, may explain the effects of somatic and situational variables on the results of the instrument in older people. OBJETIVO: Obter validade interna, de construto e de critério para a escala Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression, em idosos. MÉTODOS: O instrumento foi aplicado a 903 idosos residentes em Juiz de Fora, Estado de Minas Gerais, entre os anos de 2002-2003. Os resultados foram comparados com a versão brasileira da Geriatric Depression Scale, aplicado a uma subamostra de 446 respondentes. A consistência interna das duas escalas foi aferida pelo coeficiente alfa de Cronbach, calculado para os itens em sua totalidade e para os itens de cada fator obtido para o instrumento avaliado. Para avaliar a validade de construto, seus 20 itens foram submetidos à análise fatorial exploratória a fim de conhecer o padrão de variação conjunta dos itens e a variância explicada por cada fator. RESULTADOS: O instrumento revelou índices satisfatórios de validade interna (alfa=0,860), sensibilidade (74,6%) e especificidade (73,6%), para nota de corte >;11. Entretanto, apontou freqüência relativamente alta de falsos positivos em comparação à Geriatric Depression Scale: de 33,8% vs. 15%. A análise fatorial exploratória do instrumento gerou estrutura fatorial com três fatores: afetos negativos, dificuldades de iniciar comportamentos e afetos positivos. CONCLUSÕES: O instrumento mostrou-se psicometricamente adequado para uso entre idosos. Entretanto, estudos adicionais de natureza longitudinal e transversal, desenvolvidos em diferentes contextos, poderão esclarecer os efeitos de variáveis somáticas e situacionais sobre os resultados desse instrumento em pessoas idosas. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2007-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3227210.1590/S0034-89102007000400014Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 No. 4 (2007); 598-605 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 Núm. 4 (2007); 598-605 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 41 n. 4 (2007); 598-605 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32272/34412https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32272/34413Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBatistoni, Samila Sather TavaresNeri, Anita LiberalessoCupertino, Ana Paula F Bretas2012-07-09T00:38:04Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/32272Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-09T00:38:04Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Brazilian elderly
Validade da escala de depressão do Center for Epidemiological Studies entre idosos brasileiros
title Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Brazilian elderly
spellingShingle Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Brazilian elderly
Batistoni, Samila Sather Tavares
Idosos
Depressão^i1^sdiagnóst
Depressão^i1^spsicolo
Estudos de validação
Older people
Depression^i2^sdiagno
Depression^i2^spsychol
Validation studies
title_short Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Brazilian elderly
title_full Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Brazilian elderly
title_fullStr Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Brazilian elderly
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Brazilian elderly
title_sort Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Brazilian elderly
author Batistoni, Samila Sather Tavares
author_facet Batistoni, Samila Sather Tavares
Neri, Anita Liberalesso
Cupertino, Ana Paula F Bretas
author_role author
author2 Neri, Anita Liberalesso
Cupertino, Ana Paula F Bretas
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Batistoni, Samila Sather Tavares
Neri, Anita Liberalesso
Cupertino, Ana Paula F Bretas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Idosos
Depressão^i1^sdiagnóst
Depressão^i1^spsicolo
Estudos de validação
Older people
Depression^i2^sdiagno
Depression^i2^spsychol
Validation studies
topic Idosos
Depressão^i1^sdiagnóst
Depressão^i1^spsicolo
Estudos de validação
Older people
Depression^i2^sdiagno
Depression^i2^spsychol
Validation studies
description OBJECTIVE: To obtain internal construct and criteria validity for the Center of Epidemiological Studies - Depression scale in elderly people. METHODS: The instrument was applied to 903 elderly living in a city in southeastern Brazil, between 2002 and 2003. Results were compared with the Brazilian version of the CES-D applied to a sub-sample of 446 participants. Internal consistency of the two scales was assessed using Cronbach's alpha measured for the items in their total and for the items of each factor obtained for the assessed instrument. To assess the construct validity, the 20 items underwent exploratory factorial analysis to discover their variation pattern and the variance explained according to each factor. RESULTS: The scale presented satisfactory index for internal validity (alpha=0.860), sensibility (74.6%), specificity (73.6%), and for cutoff point >;11. However, it presented a relatively high frequency of false positives compared to the GDS 33.8% vs. 15%. Exploratory factorial analysis of the instrument created factorial structure with three factors: negative affects, problems initiating behaviors, and positive affects. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument seemed to be psychometrically suitable when applied to older people. However, further cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, carried out in different contexts, may explain the effects of somatic and situational variables on the results of the instrument in older people.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32272
10.1590/S0034-89102007000400014
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32272
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-89102007000400014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32272/34412
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32272/34413
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 No. 4 (2007); 598-605
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 Núm. 4 (2007); 598-605
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 41 n. 4 (2007); 598-605
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221786167574528