Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Karlo Jozefo Quadros de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Roure, Francis Nakle de, Bittencourt, Roberto José, Santos, Regina Maria Dias Buani dos, Bittencourt, Fernanda Viana, Gottems, Leila Bernarda Bernarda Donato, Amorim, Fábio Ferreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the active health Ombudsman service as an instrument to evaluate the quality of delivery and birth care in the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of the telephone survey type carried out with 1,007 mothers with deliveries between October 15, 2013 and November 19, 2013 in the twelve public maternity hospitals that make up the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. The instrument has 25 multiple choice or Likert scale questions, including sociodemographic data and acceptability evaluation in five domains: accessibility, relationship between the patient and health professionals, conditions of the structure of the service, information to the patient, and equity and opinion of the patient. We have studied qualitative or categorical variables according to the frequency and distribution of proportions. We have used the score transformed into a scale from zero to 100 for the analysis of the Likert-type scale questions. Results have been expressed as mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: Access to prenatal appointments was evaluated as good or excellent by 86.1% of the participants and laboratory tests was evaluated as good or excellent by 85.2% of them. The access to imaging tests was evaluations as good or excellent by 45.7% of the women; 79.5% of the interviewees had their delivery in the maternity hospital where they sought initial care and 18.3% received a home visit by a community health agent after discharge. Most women reported that newborns were placed skin-to-skin immediately after birth, 48.9% had a companion at the time of the delivery, 76.3% were advised about the first appointment of the newborn, and 94.8% were advised on breastfeeding in the maternity hospital. Regarding the evaluation of health professionals, 85.9% of the women considered reception and cordiality as good or excellent at the prenatal care and 94.8% considered it as good or excellent at the maternity hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The active health Ombudsman service has contributed to evaluate the quality of public management by allowing the incorporation of the perspective of users of the health service in the evaluation of the acceptability of the Cegonha Network in the Federal District of Brazil.
id USP-23_8918fab37b5355d26987bdf84dd1d52c
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/148649
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth careOuvidoria ativa em saúde: avaliação da qualidade da atenção ao parto e nascimentoPregnant Women. Patient Advocacy. Patient Rights. Maternal-Child Health Services. Quality of Health Care.Gestantes. Defesa do Paciente. Direitos do Paciente. Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil. Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the active health Ombudsman service as an instrument to evaluate the quality of delivery and birth care in the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of the telephone survey type carried out with 1,007 mothers with deliveries between October 15, 2013 and November 19, 2013 in the twelve public maternity hospitals that make up the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. The instrument has 25 multiple choice or Likert scale questions, including sociodemographic data and acceptability evaluation in five domains: accessibility, relationship between the patient and health professionals, conditions of the structure of the service, information to the patient, and equity and opinion of the patient. We have studied qualitative or categorical variables according to the frequency and distribution of proportions. We have used the score transformed into a scale from zero to 100 for the analysis of the Likert-type scale questions. Results have been expressed as mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: Access to prenatal appointments was evaluated as good or excellent by 86.1% of the participants and laboratory tests was evaluated as good or excellent by 85.2% of them. The access to imaging tests was evaluations as good or excellent by 45.7% of the women; 79.5% of the interviewees had their delivery in the maternity hospital where they sought initial care and 18.3% received a home visit by a community health agent after discharge. Most women reported that newborns were placed skin-to-skin immediately after birth, 48.9% had a companion at the time of the delivery, 76.3% were advised about the first appointment of the newborn, and 94.8% were advised on breastfeeding in the maternity hospital. Regarding the evaluation of health professionals, 85.9% of the women considered reception and cordiality as good or excellent at the prenatal care and 94.8% considered it as good or excellent at the maternity hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The active health Ombudsman service has contributed to evaluate the quality of public management by allowing the incorporation of the perspective of users of the health service in the evaluation of the acceptability of the Cegonha Network in the Federal District of Brazil.OBJETIVO: Avaliar a ouvidoria ativa em saúde como ferramenta de avaliação da qualidade da atenção ao parto e nascimento da Rede Cegonha do Distrito Federal. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal, do tipo inquérito por via telefônica, em 1.007 puérperas com partos realizados entre 15/10/2013 e 19/11/2013, nas 12 maternidades públicas que compõem a Rede Cegonha no Distrito Federal. O instrumento continha 25 questões de múltipla escolha ou do tipo escala Likert, que incluiu dados sociodemográficos e avaliação da aceitabilidade em cinco domínios: acessibilidade, relacionamento entre o paciente e os profissionais de saúde, condições da estrutura do serviço, informação ao paciente, e equidade e opinião do paciente. Variáveis qualitativas ou categóricas foram estudadas de acordo com a frequência e distribuição de proporções. Utilizou-se o escore transformado para uma escala de zero a 100 para análise das questões do tipo escala Likert. Resultados foram expressos em média e desvio-padrão. RESULTADOS: O acesso às consultas de pré-natal foi avaliado como bom ou ótimo por 86,1% das participantes e os exames laboratoriais como bom ou ótimo por 85,2%. O acesso aos exames de imagem teve 45,7% avaliações boas ou ótimas; 79,5% das entrevistadas realizaram o parto na maternidade onde buscaram atendimento inicial e 18,3% receberam visita domiciliar por agente comunitário de saúde após a alta. A maioria relatou que os recém-nascidos foram colocados em seus colos ou peitos imediatamente após o nascimento, 48,9% tiveram presença de acompanhante no momento do parto, 76,3% foram orientadas em relação à primeira consulta dos recém-nascidos e 94,8% sobre aleitamento materno na maternidade. Quanto à avaliação dos profissionais de saúde, 85,9% das mulheres consideraram o acolhimento e a cordialidade recebidos como bons ou ótimos no pré-natal e 94,8%, como bons ou ótimos na maternidade. CONCLUSÕES: A ouvidoria ativa em saúde contribuiu para a avaliação da qualidade da gestão pública, possibilitando a incorporação da perspectiva das usuárias do serviço de saúde na avaliação da aceitabilidade da Rede Cegonha no Distrito Federal.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2018-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/14864910.11606/S1518-8787.2018052017291Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 76Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 76Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 52 (2018); 761518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/146098https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/146099https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/148376Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Karlo Jozefo Quadros deRoure, Francis Nakle deBittencourt, Roberto JoséSantos, Regina Maria Dias Buani dosBittencourt, Fernanda VianaGottems, Leila Bernarda Bernarda DonatoAmorim, Fábio Ferreira2019-01-28T15:41:45Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/148649Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2019-01-28T15:41:45Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care
Ouvidoria ativa em saúde: avaliação da qualidade da atenção ao parto e nascimento
title Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care
spellingShingle Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care
Almeida, Karlo Jozefo Quadros de
Pregnant Women. Patient Advocacy. Patient Rights. Maternal-Child Health Services. Quality of Health Care.
Gestantes. Defesa do Paciente. Direitos do Paciente. Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil. Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde.
title_short Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care
title_full Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care
title_fullStr Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care
title_full_unstemmed Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care
title_sort Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care
author Almeida, Karlo Jozefo Quadros de
author_facet Almeida, Karlo Jozefo Quadros de
Roure, Francis Nakle de
Bittencourt, Roberto José
Santos, Regina Maria Dias Buani dos
Bittencourt, Fernanda Viana
Gottems, Leila Bernarda Bernarda Donato
Amorim, Fábio Ferreira
author_role author
author2 Roure, Francis Nakle de
Bittencourt, Roberto José
Santos, Regina Maria Dias Buani dos
Bittencourt, Fernanda Viana
Gottems, Leila Bernarda Bernarda Donato
Amorim, Fábio Ferreira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Karlo Jozefo Quadros de
Roure, Francis Nakle de
Bittencourt, Roberto José
Santos, Regina Maria Dias Buani dos
Bittencourt, Fernanda Viana
Gottems, Leila Bernarda Bernarda Donato
Amorim, Fábio Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pregnant Women. Patient Advocacy. Patient Rights. Maternal-Child Health Services. Quality of Health Care.
Gestantes. Defesa do Paciente. Direitos do Paciente. Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil. Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde.
topic Pregnant Women. Patient Advocacy. Patient Rights. Maternal-Child Health Services. Quality of Health Care.
Gestantes. Defesa do Paciente. Direitos do Paciente. Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil. Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde.
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the active health Ombudsman service as an instrument to evaluate the quality of delivery and birth care in the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of the telephone survey type carried out with 1,007 mothers with deliveries between October 15, 2013 and November 19, 2013 in the twelve public maternity hospitals that make up the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. The instrument has 25 multiple choice or Likert scale questions, including sociodemographic data and acceptability evaluation in five domains: accessibility, relationship between the patient and health professionals, conditions of the structure of the service, information to the patient, and equity and opinion of the patient. We have studied qualitative or categorical variables according to the frequency and distribution of proportions. We have used the score transformed into a scale from zero to 100 for the analysis of the Likert-type scale questions. Results have been expressed as mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: Access to prenatal appointments was evaluated as good or excellent by 86.1% of the participants and laboratory tests was evaluated as good or excellent by 85.2% of them. The access to imaging tests was evaluations as good or excellent by 45.7% of the women; 79.5% of the interviewees had their delivery in the maternity hospital where they sought initial care and 18.3% received a home visit by a community health agent after discharge. Most women reported that newborns were placed skin-to-skin immediately after birth, 48.9% had a companion at the time of the delivery, 76.3% were advised about the first appointment of the newborn, and 94.8% were advised on breastfeeding in the maternity hospital. Regarding the evaluation of health professionals, 85.9% of the women considered reception and cordiality as good or excellent at the prenatal care and 94.8% considered it as good or excellent at the maternity hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The active health Ombudsman service has contributed to evaluate the quality of public management by allowing the incorporation of the perspective of users of the health service in the evaluation of the acceptability of the Cegonha Network in the Federal District of Brazil.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649
10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052017291
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649
identifier_str_mv 10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052017291
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/146098
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/146099
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/148376
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 76
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 76
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 52 (2018); 76
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221799856734208