Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the active health Ombudsman service as an instrument to evaluate the quality of delivery and birth care in the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of the telephone survey type carried out with 1,007 mothers with deliveries between October 15, 2013 and November 19, 2013 in the twelve public maternity hospitals that make up the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. The instrument has 25 multiple choice or Likert scale questions, including sociodemographic data and acceptability evaluation in five domains: accessibility, relationship between the patient and health professionals, conditions of the structure of the service, information to the patient, and equity and opinion of the patient. We have studied qualitative or categorical variables according to the frequency and distribution of proportions. We have used the score transformed into a scale from zero to 100 for the analysis of the Likert-type scale questions. Results have been expressed as mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: Access to prenatal appointments was evaluated as good or excellent by 86.1% of the participants and laboratory tests was evaluated as good or excellent by 85.2% of them. The access to imaging tests was evaluations as good or excellent by 45.7% of the women; 79.5% of the interviewees had their delivery in the maternity hospital where they sought initial care and 18.3% received a home visit by a community health agent after discharge. Most women reported that newborns were placed skin-to-skin immediately after birth, 48.9% had a companion at the time of the delivery, 76.3% were advised about the first appointment of the newborn, and 94.8% were advised on breastfeeding in the maternity hospital. Regarding the evaluation of health professionals, 85.9% of the women considered reception and cordiality as good or excellent at the prenatal care and 94.8% considered it as good or excellent at the maternity hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The active health Ombudsman service has contributed to evaluate the quality of public management by allowing the incorporation of the perspective of users of the health service in the evaluation of the acceptability of the Cegonha Network in the Federal District of Brazil. |
id |
USP-23_8918fab37b5355d26987bdf84dd1d52c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/148649 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth careOuvidoria ativa em saúde: avaliação da qualidade da atenção ao parto e nascimentoPregnant Women. Patient Advocacy. Patient Rights. Maternal-Child Health Services. Quality of Health Care.Gestantes. Defesa do Paciente. Direitos do Paciente. Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil. Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the active health Ombudsman service as an instrument to evaluate the quality of delivery and birth care in the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of the telephone survey type carried out with 1,007 mothers with deliveries between October 15, 2013 and November 19, 2013 in the twelve public maternity hospitals that make up the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. The instrument has 25 multiple choice or Likert scale questions, including sociodemographic data and acceptability evaluation in five domains: accessibility, relationship between the patient and health professionals, conditions of the structure of the service, information to the patient, and equity and opinion of the patient. We have studied qualitative or categorical variables according to the frequency and distribution of proportions. We have used the score transformed into a scale from zero to 100 for the analysis of the Likert-type scale questions. Results have been expressed as mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: Access to prenatal appointments was evaluated as good or excellent by 86.1% of the participants and laboratory tests was evaluated as good or excellent by 85.2% of them. The access to imaging tests was evaluations as good or excellent by 45.7% of the women; 79.5% of the interviewees had their delivery in the maternity hospital where they sought initial care and 18.3% received a home visit by a community health agent after discharge. Most women reported that newborns were placed skin-to-skin immediately after birth, 48.9% had a companion at the time of the delivery, 76.3% were advised about the first appointment of the newborn, and 94.8% were advised on breastfeeding in the maternity hospital. Regarding the evaluation of health professionals, 85.9% of the women considered reception and cordiality as good or excellent at the prenatal care and 94.8% considered it as good or excellent at the maternity hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The active health Ombudsman service has contributed to evaluate the quality of public management by allowing the incorporation of the perspective of users of the health service in the evaluation of the acceptability of the Cegonha Network in the Federal District of Brazil.OBJETIVO: Avaliar a ouvidoria ativa em saúde como ferramenta de avaliação da qualidade da atenção ao parto e nascimento da Rede Cegonha do Distrito Federal. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal, do tipo inquérito por via telefônica, em 1.007 puérperas com partos realizados entre 15/10/2013 e 19/11/2013, nas 12 maternidades públicas que compõem a Rede Cegonha no Distrito Federal. O instrumento continha 25 questões de múltipla escolha ou do tipo escala Likert, que incluiu dados sociodemográficos e avaliação da aceitabilidade em cinco domínios: acessibilidade, relacionamento entre o paciente e os profissionais de saúde, condições da estrutura do serviço, informação ao paciente, e equidade e opinião do paciente. Variáveis qualitativas ou categóricas foram estudadas de acordo com a frequência e distribuição de proporções. Utilizou-se o escore transformado para uma escala de zero a 100 para análise das questões do tipo escala Likert. Resultados foram expressos em média e desvio-padrão. RESULTADOS: O acesso às consultas de pré-natal foi avaliado como bom ou ótimo por 86,1% das participantes e os exames laboratoriais como bom ou ótimo por 85,2%. O acesso aos exames de imagem teve 45,7% avaliações boas ou ótimas; 79,5% das entrevistadas realizaram o parto na maternidade onde buscaram atendimento inicial e 18,3% receberam visita domiciliar por agente comunitário de saúde após a alta. A maioria relatou que os recém-nascidos foram colocados em seus colos ou peitos imediatamente após o nascimento, 48,9% tiveram presença de acompanhante no momento do parto, 76,3% foram orientadas em relação à primeira consulta dos recém-nascidos e 94,8% sobre aleitamento materno na maternidade. Quanto à avaliação dos profissionais de saúde, 85,9% das mulheres consideraram o acolhimento e a cordialidade recebidos como bons ou ótimos no pré-natal e 94,8%, como bons ou ótimos na maternidade. CONCLUSÕES: A ouvidoria ativa em saúde contribuiu para a avaliação da qualidade da gestão pública, possibilitando a incorporação da perspectiva das usuárias do serviço de saúde na avaliação da aceitabilidade da Rede Cegonha no Distrito Federal.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2018-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/14864910.11606/S1518-8787.2018052017291Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 76Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 76Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 52 (2018); 761518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/146098https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/146099https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/148376Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Karlo Jozefo Quadros deRoure, Francis Nakle deBittencourt, Roberto JoséSantos, Regina Maria Dias Buani dosBittencourt, Fernanda VianaGottems, Leila Bernarda Bernarda DonatoAmorim, Fábio Ferreira2019-01-28T15:41:45Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/148649Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2019-01-28T15:41:45Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care Ouvidoria ativa em saúde: avaliação da qualidade da atenção ao parto e nascimento |
title |
Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care |
spellingShingle |
Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care Almeida, Karlo Jozefo Quadros de Pregnant Women. Patient Advocacy. Patient Rights. Maternal-Child Health Services. Quality of Health Care. Gestantes. Defesa do Paciente. Direitos do Paciente. Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil. Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde. |
title_short |
Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care |
title_full |
Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care |
title_fullStr |
Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care |
title_full_unstemmed |
Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care |
title_sort |
Active health Ombudsman service: evaluation of the quality of delivery and birth care |
author |
Almeida, Karlo Jozefo Quadros de |
author_facet |
Almeida, Karlo Jozefo Quadros de Roure, Francis Nakle de Bittencourt, Roberto José Santos, Regina Maria Dias Buani dos Bittencourt, Fernanda Viana Gottems, Leila Bernarda Bernarda Donato Amorim, Fábio Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Roure, Francis Nakle de Bittencourt, Roberto José Santos, Regina Maria Dias Buani dos Bittencourt, Fernanda Viana Gottems, Leila Bernarda Bernarda Donato Amorim, Fábio Ferreira |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, Karlo Jozefo Quadros de Roure, Francis Nakle de Bittencourt, Roberto José Santos, Regina Maria Dias Buani dos Bittencourt, Fernanda Viana Gottems, Leila Bernarda Bernarda Donato Amorim, Fábio Ferreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pregnant Women. Patient Advocacy. Patient Rights. Maternal-Child Health Services. Quality of Health Care. Gestantes. Defesa do Paciente. Direitos do Paciente. Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil. Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde. |
topic |
Pregnant Women. Patient Advocacy. Patient Rights. Maternal-Child Health Services. Quality of Health Care. Gestantes. Defesa do Paciente. Direitos do Paciente. Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil. Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde. |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the active health Ombudsman service as an instrument to evaluate the quality of delivery and birth care in the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of the telephone survey type carried out with 1,007 mothers with deliveries between October 15, 2013 and November 19, 2013 in the twelve public maternity hospitals that make up the Cegonha Network of the Federal District of Brazil. The instrument has 25 multiple choice or Likert scale questions, including sociodemographic data and acceptability evaluation in five domains: accessibility, relationship between the patient and health professionals, conditions of the structure of the service, information to the patient, and equity and opinion of the patient. We have studied qualitative or categorical variables according to the frequency and distribution of proportions. We have used the score transformed into a scale from zero to 100 for the analysis of the Likert-type scale questions. Results have been expressed as mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: Access to prenatal appointments was evaluated as good or excellent by 86.1% of the participants and laboratory tests was evaluated as good or excellent by 85.2% of them. The access to imaging tests was evaluations as good or excellent by 45.7% of the women; 79.5% of the interviewees had their delivery in the maternity hospital where they sought initial care and 18.3% received a home visit by a community health agent after discharge. Most women reported that newborns were placed skin-to-skin immediately after birth, 48.9% had a companion at the time of the delivery, 76.3% were advised about the first appointment of the newborn, and 94.8% were advised on breastfeeding in the maternity hospital. Regarding the evaluation of health professionals, 85.9% of the women considered reception and cordiality as good or excellent at the prenatal care and 94.8% considered it as good or excellent at the maternity hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The active health Ombudsman service has contributed to evaluate the quality of public management by allowing the incorporation of the perspective of users of the health service in the evaluation of the acceptability of the Cegonha Network in the Federal District of Brazil. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649 10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052017291 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052017291 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/146098 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/146099 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/148649/148376 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 76 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 52 (2018); 76 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 52 (2018); 76 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221799856734208 |