Brazilian abortion law: the opinion of judges and prosecutors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Duarte, Graciana Alves
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Osis, Maria José Duarte, Faúndes, Anibal, Sousa, Maria Helena de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32786
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To analyze the opinion of judges and prosecutors concerning Brazilian abortion law and situations in which the abortion should be allowed. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed with 1,493 judges and 2,614 prosecutors in Brazil between 2005 and 2006. Participants completed a structured questionnaire approaching sociodemographic characteristics, opinions about abortion law, and circumstances in which abortion is considered lawful. Bivariate and multivariate analyses of data were carried out through Poisson regression. RESULTS: The majority of participants (78%) found that the circumstances in which abortion is considered lawful should be broadened, or even that abortion should not be criminalized. The highest rates of pro-abortion opinions resulted from: risk to the life of the mother (84%), anencephaly (83%), severe congenital malformation of fetus (82%), and pregnancy resulting from rape (82%). Variables related to religion were strongly associated to the opinion of participants. CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend in considering the need of changing the current abortion law, in the sense of widening the circumstances in which abortion is considered lawful, or even toward decriminalizing abortion, regardless of the circumstances in which it takes place.
id USP-23_bdea970df8afe499b198d462bb3d458a
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/32786
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Brazilian abortion law: the opinion of judges and prosecutors Aborto y legislación: opinión de magistrados y promotores de justicia brasileros Aborto e legislação: opinião de magistrados e promotores de justiça brasileiros Aborto LegalAborto CriminosoDireito Penal^i1^slegislaDireito Penal^i1^sjurisprudênMinistério PúblicoPercepção SocialAborto LegalAborto CriminalDerecho Penal^i3^slegislacDerecho Penal^i3^sjurisprudenMinisterio PúblicoPercepción SocialAbortionLegalCriminalCriminal Law^i2^slegislatCriminal Law^i2^sjurisprudePublic AttorneysSocial Perception OBJECTIVE: To analyze the opinion of judges and prosecutors concerning Brazilian abortion law and situations in which the abortion should be allowed. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed with 1,493 judges and 2,614 prosecutors in Brazil between 2005 and 2006. Participants completed a structured questionnaire approaching sociodemographic characteristics, opinions about abortion law, and circumstances in which abortion is considered lawful. Bivariate and multivariate analyses of data were carried out through Poisson regression. RESULTS: The majority of participants (78%) found that the circumstances in which abortion is considered lawful should be broadened, or even that abortion should not be criminalized. The highest rates of pro-abortion opinions resulted from: risk to the life of the mother (84%), anencephaly (83%), severe congenital malformation of fetus (82%), and pregnancy resulting from rape (82%). Variables related to religion were strongly associated to the opinion of participants. CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend in considering the need of changing the current abortion law, in the sense of widening the circumstances in which abortion is considered lawful, or even toward decriminalizing abortion, regardless of the circumstances in which it takes place. OBJETIVO: Analizar opiniones de jueces y promotores de justicia sobre la legislación brasilera y las circunstancias en que el aborto inducido debería ser permitido. MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal realizado con 1.493 jueces y 2.614 promotores en Brasil entre 2005 y 2006. Los participantes llenaron un cuestionario estructurado sobre características sociodemográficas, opiniones acerca de la legislación que trata el aborto y circunstancias para permitirlo. Se realizaron análisis bivariado y multivariado por regresión de Poisson. RESULTADOS: La mayoría (78%) de los participantes opinó que las circunstancias en las cuales no se castiga el aborto deberían ser ampliadas, o más aún que el aborto no debería ser considerado crimen. Las mayores proporciones de opiniones favorables para que el aborto sea permitido se refirieron a riesgo para la vida de la gestante (84%), anencefalia (83%), malformación congénita grave (82%) y gravidez resultante de violación (82%). Las variables relativas a la religión fueron las más frecuentemente asociadas a tales opiniones. CONCLUSIONES: Se observó una tendencia a considerar la necesidad de cambios en la actual legislación brasilera en el sentido de ampliar las circunstancias en las cuales no se castiga el aborto y hasta dejar de considerarlo un crimen, independientemente de la circunstancia en que es practicado. OBJETIVO: Analisar opiniões de juízes e promotores de justiça sobre a legislação brasileira e as circunstâncias em que o aborto induzido deveria ser permitido. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal realizado com 1.493 juízes e 2.614 promotores no Brasil entre 2005 e 2006. Os participantes preencheram um questionário estruturado sobre características sociodemográficas, opiniões acerca da legislação que trata do aborto e circunstâncias para permiti-lo. Realizaram-se análises bivariada e multivariada por regressão de Poisson. RESULTADOS: A maioria (78%) dos participantes opinou que as circunstâncias nas quais não se pune o aborto deveriam ser ampliadas, ou mesmo que o aborto não deveria ser considerado crime. As maiores proporções de opiniões favoráveis a que o aborto seja permitido referiram-se a risco para a vida da gestante (84%), anencefalia (83%), malformação congênita grave (82%) e gravidez resultante de estupro (82%). As variáveis relativas à religião foram as mais freqüentemente associadas a essas opiniões. CONCLUSÕES: Observou-se uma tendência a considerar a necessidade de mudanças na atual legislação brasileira no sentido de ampliar as circunstâncias nas quais não se pune o aborto e até deixar de considerá-lo como um crime, independentemente da circunstância em que é praticado. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2010-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3278610.1590/S0034-89102010005000006Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 44 No. 3 (2010); 406-420 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 44 Núm. 3 (2010); 406-420 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 44 n. 3 (2010); 406-420 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32786/35283https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32786/35284Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDuarte, Graciana AlvesOsis, Maria José DuarteFaúndes, AnibalSousa, Maria Helena de2012-07-10T02:19:32Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/32786Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-10T02:19:32Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian abortion law: the opinion of judges and prosecutors
Aborto y legislación: opinión de magistrados y promotores de justicia brasileros
Aborto e legislação: opinião de magistrados e promotores de justiça brasileiros
title Brazilian abortion law: the opinion of judges and prosecutors
spellingShingle Brazilian abortion law: the opinion of judges and prosecutors
Duarte, Graciana Alves
Aborto Legal
Aborto Criminoso
Direito Penal^i1^slegisla
Direito Penal^i1^sjurisprudên
Ministério Público
Percepção Social
Aborto Legal
Aborto Criminal
Derecho Penal^i3^slegislac
Derecho Penal^i3^sjurispruden
Ministerio Público
Percepción Social
Abortion
Legal
Criminal
Criminal Law^i2^slegislat
Criminal Law^i2^sjurisprude
Public Attorneys
Social Perception
title_short Brazilian abortion law: the opinion of judges and prosecutors
title_full Brazilian abortion law: the opinion of judges and prosecutors
title_fullStr Brazilian abortion law: the opinion of judges and prosecutors
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian abortion law: the opinion of judges and prosecutors
title_sort Brazilian abortion law: the opinion of judges and prosecutors
author Duarte, Graciana Alves
author_facet Duarte, Graciana Alves
Osis, Maria José Duarte
Faúndes, Anibal
Sousa, Maria Helena de
author_role author
author2 Osis, Maria José Duarte
Faúndes, Anibal
Sousa, Maria Helena de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duarte, Graciana Alves
Osis, Maria José Duarte
Faúndes, Anibal
Sousa, Maria Helena de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aborto Legal
Aborto Criminoso
Direito Penal^i1^slegisla
Direito Penal^i1^sjurisprudên
Ministério Público
Percepção Social
Aborto Legal
Aborto Criminal
Derecho Penal^i3^slegislac
Derecho Penal^i3^sjurispruden
Ministerio Público
Percepción Social
Abortion
Legal
Criminal
Criminal Law^i2^slegislat
Criminal Law^i2^sjurisprude
Public Attorneys
Social Perception
topic Aborto Legal
Aborto Criminoso
Direito Penal^i1^slegisla
Direito Penal^i1^sjurisprudên
Ministério Público
Percepção Social
Aborto Legal
Aborto Criminal
Derecho Penal^i3^slegislac
Derecho Penal^i3^sjurispruden
Ministerio Público
Percepción Social
Abortion
Legal
Criminal
Criminal Law^i2^slegislat
Criminal Law^i2^sjurisprude
Public Attorneys
Social Perception
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the opinion of judges and prosecutors concerning Brazilian abortion law and situations in which the abortion should be allowed. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed with 1,493 judges and 2,614 prosecutors in Brazil between 2005 and 2006. Participants completed a structured questionnaire approaching sociodemographic characteristics, opinions about abortion law, and circumstances in which abortion is considered lawful. Bivariate and multivariate analyses of data were carried out through Poisson regression. RESULTS: The majority of participants (78%) found that the circumstances in which abortion is considered lawful should be broadened, or even that abortion should not be criminalized. The highest rates of pro-abortion opinions resulted from: risk to the life of the mother (84%), anencephaly (83%), severe congenital malformation of fetus (82%), and pregnancy resulting from rape (82%). Variables related to religion were strongly associated to the opinion of participants. CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend in considering the need of changing the current abortion law, in the sense of widening the circumstances in which abortion is considered lawful, or even toward decriminalizing abortion, regardless of the circumstances in which it takes place.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32786
10.1590/S0034-89102010005000006
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32786
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-89102010005000006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32786/35283
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32786/35284
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 44 No. 3 (2010); 406-420
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 44 Núm. 3 (2010); 406-420
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 44 n. 3 (2010); 406-420
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221790941741056