Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carneiro,Alessandra Suptitz
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Dalmolin,Graziele de Lima, Magnago,Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza, Moreira,Laura Prestes, Costa,Eduarda Dalla, Andolhe,Rafaela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342021000100569
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the perception of patient safety culture among health workers from critical and non-critical areas. Method: cross-sectional study with health workers from critical and non-critical areas of a large hospital. Data collection used a characterization instrument and the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. The analysis was performed in the Predictive Analytics Software Statistic®. Results: a total of 393 workers participated, predominantly women, over 43 years old, nursing technicians, with a partner, and children. Results indicated that the areas have a negative perception of patient safety (66.5%, ±12.7 critical; 63.5%, ±14.4 non-critical). Only job satisfaction had a positive score (83.0%, ±15.9 critical; 80.1%, ±17.5 non-critical). There was a relationship between being a worker in critical areas and having a positive perception of the unit’s management (p = 0.041). Conclusion: both areas have a negative perception of the safety culture. Although critical areas have obtained more positive evaluations, the results did not show statistical significance when compared to non-critical areas.
id USP-24_59e6c0bcf3e4641308725b16dd3bfe4a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0080-62342021000100569
network_acronym_str USP-24
network_name_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative studyNursingPatient SafetyHospitalsHospital UnitsComparative StudyABSTRACT Objective: to compare the perception of patient safety culture among health workers from critical and non-critical areas. Method: cross-sectional study with health workers from critical and non-critical areas of a large hospital. Data collection used a characterization instrument and the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. The analysis was performed in the Predictive Analytics Software Statistic®. Results: a total of 393 workers participated, predominantly women, over 43 years old, nursing technicians, with a partner, and children. Results indicated that the areas have a negative perception of patient safety (66.5%, ±12.7 critical; 63.5%, ±14.4 non-critical). Only job satisfaction had a positive score (83.0%, ±15.9 critical; 80.1%, ±17.5 non-critical). There was a relationship between being a worker in critical areas and having a positive perception of the unit’s management (p = 0.041). Conclusion: both areas have a negative perception of the safety culture. Although critical areas have obtained more positive evaluations, the results did not show statistical significance when compared to non-critical areas.Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342021000100569Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.55 2021reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2021-0141info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarneiro,Alessandra SuptitzDalmolin,Graziele de LimaMagnago,Tânia Solange Bosi de SouzaMoreira,Laura PrestesCosta,Eduarda DallaAndolhe,Rafaelaeng2021-10-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0080-62342021000100569Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/reeuspPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||nursingscholar@usp.br1980-220X0080-6234opendoar:2021-10-06T00:00Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative study
title Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative study
spellingShingle Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative study
Carneiro,Alessandra Suptitz
Nursing
Patient Safety
Hospitals
Hospital Units
Comparative Study
title_short Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative study
title_full Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative study
title_fullStr Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative study
title_sort Patient safety culture in critical and non-critical areas: a comparative study
author Carneiro,Alessandra Suptitz
author_facet Carneiro,Alessandra Suptitz
Dalmolin,Graziele de Lima
Magnago,Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza
Moreira,Laura Prestes
Costa,Eduarda Dalla
Andolhe,Rafaela
author_role author
author2 Dalmolin,Graziele de Lima
Magnago,Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza
Moreira,Laura Prestes
Costa,Eduarda Dalla
Andolhe,Rafaela
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carneiro,Alessandra Suptitz
Dalmolin,Graziele de Lima
Magnago,Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza
Moreira,Laura Prestes
Costa,Eduarda Dalla
Andolhe,Rafaela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nursing
Patient Safety
Hospitals
Hospital Units
Comparative Study
topic Nursing
Patient Safety
Hospitals
Hospital Units
Comparative Study
description ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the perception of patient safety culture among health workers from critical and non-critical areas. Method: cross-sectional study with health workers from critical and non-critical areas of a large hospital. Data collection used a characterization instrument and the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. The analysis was performed in the Predictive Analytics Software Statistic®. Results: a total of 393 workers participated, predominantly women, over 43 years old, nursing technicians, with a partner, and children. Results indicated that the areas have a negative perception of patient safety (66.5%, ±12.7 critical; 63.5%, ±14.4 non-critical). Only job satisfaction had a positive score (83.0%, ±15.9 critical; 80.1%, ±17.5 non-critical). There was a relationship between being a worker in critical areas and having a positive perception of the unit’s management (p = 0.041). Conclusion: both areas have a negative perception of the safety culture. Although critical areas have obtained more positive evaluations, the results did not show statistical significance when compared to non-critical areas.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342021000100569
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342021000100569
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2021-0141
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.55 2021
reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
collection Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||nursingscholar@usp.br
_version_ 1748936541520003072