Handling errors in conventional and smart pump infusions: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moreira,Ana Paula Amorim
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Carvalho,Márglory Fraga de, Silva,Roberto Carlos Lyra da, Marta,Cristiano Bertolossi, Fonseca,Eliana Rosa da, Barbosa,Maria Tereza Serrano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342020000100802
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To identify the scientific evidence on the frequency of handling errors of conventional and smart pump infusions in intravenous insulin therapy in intensive care units. Method: A systematic review with meta-analysis conducted in the Virtual Health Library, MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Articles were assessed regarding the level of evidence by applying the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Evidence Scale. Results: Twelve (12) publications were selected which met the eligibility criteria. The programming error rate using the conventional infusion pump ranged from 10% to 40.1%, and the smart pump technology error rate ranged from 0.3 to 14%. The meta-analysis of two studies favored the smart pump in reducing the relative risk of programming errors by 51%. Conclusion: Based on selected articles, the smart pump reduces the risk of programming errors.
id USP-24_8f7d31a1535026f9b1aa0c177fcaecd8
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0080-62342020000100802
network_acronym_str USP-24
network_name_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Handling errors in conventional and smart pump infusions: A systematic review with meta-analysisInfusion PumpsInsulinMedication ErrorsCritical Care NursingIntensive Care UnitsReviewAbstract Objective: To identify the scientific evidence on the frequency of handling errors of conventional and smart pump infusions in intravenous insulin therapy in intensive care units. Method: A systematic review with meta-analysis conducted in the Virtual Health Library, MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Articles were assessed regarding the level of evidence by applying the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Evidence Scale. Results: Twelve (12) publications were selected which met the eligibility criteria. The programming error rate using the conventional infusion pump ranged from 10% to 40.1%, and the smart pump technology error rate ranged from 0.3 to 14%. The meta-analysis of two studies favored the smart pump in reducing the relative risk of programming errors by 51%. Conclusion: Based on selected articles, the smart pump reduces the risk of programming errors.Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342020000100802Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.54 2020reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/s1980-220x2018032603562info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira,Ana Paula AmorimCarvalho,Márglory Fraga deSilva,Roberto Carlos Lyra daMarta,Cristiano BertolossiFonseca,Eliana Rosa daBarbosa,Maria Tereza Serranoeng2020-05-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0080-62342020000100802Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/reeuspPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||nursingscholar@usp.br1980-220X0080-6234opendoar:2020-05-05T00:00Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Handling errors in conventional and smart pump infusions: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title Handling errors in conventional and smart pump infusions: A systematic review with meta-analysis
spellingShingle Handling errors in conventional and smart pump infusions: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Moreira,Ana Paula Amorim
Infusion Pumps
Insulin
Medication Errors
Critical Care Nursing
Intensive Care Units
Review
title_short Handling errors in conventional and smart pump infusions: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full Handling errors in conventional and smart pump infusions: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr Handling errors in conventional and smart pump infusions: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Handling errors in conventional and smart pump infusions: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort Handling errors in conventional and smart pump infusions: A systematic review with meta-analysis
author Moreira,Ana Paula Amorim
author_facet Moreira,Ana Paula Amorim
Carvalho,Márglory Fraga de
Silva,Roberto Carlos Lyra da
Marta,Cristiano Bertolossi
Fonseca,Eliana Rosa da
Barbosa,Maria Tereza Serrano
author_role author
author2 Carvalho,Márglory Fraga de
Silva,Roberto Carlos Lyra da
Marta,Cristiano Bertolossi
Fonseca,Eliana Rosa da
Barbosa,Maria Tereza Serrano
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moreira,Ana Paula Amorim
Carvalho,Márglory Fraga de
Silva,Roberto Carlos Lyra da
Marta,Cristiano Bertolossi
Fonseca,Eliana Rosa da
Barbosa,Maria Tereza Serrano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Infusion Pumps
Insulin
Medication Errors
Critical Care Nursing
Intensive Care Units
Review
topic Infusion Pumps
Insulin
Medication Errors
Critical Care Nursing
Intensive Care Units
Review
description Abstract Objective: To identify the scientific evidence on the frequency of handling errors of conventional and smart pump infusions in intravenous insulin therapy in intensive care units. Method: A systematic review with meta-analysis conducted in the Virtual Health Library, MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Articles were assessed regarding the level of evidence by applying the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Evidence Scale. Results: Twelve (12) publications were selected which met the eligibility criteria. The programming error rate using the conventional infusion pump ranged from 10% to 40.1%, and the smart pump technology error rate ranged from 0.3 to 14%. The meta-analysis of two studies favored the smart pump in reducing the relative risk of programming errors by 51%. Conclusion: Based on selected articles, the smart pump reduces the risk of programming errors.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342020000100802
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342020000100802
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1980-220x2018032603562
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.54 2020
reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
collection Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||nursingscholar@usp.br
_version_ 1748936540914974720

Registros relacionados