Um novo conceito para parque urbano no Brasil do século XXI
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Paisagem e Ambiente (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/paam/article/view/155785 |
Resumo: | This article has the objective to show that urban parks established between 2000 and 2017 in Brazilian cities are different from the parks of the twentieth century and have created new design and management challenges. The great parks of the twentieth century were intended for the leisure of the urban masses and were made in central or housing areas of higher income segments. The new parks, largely, were made with less emphasis on leisure provision but, above all, on environmental conservation and are located in less-central neighborhoods or lower-income camps. The article develops from the work of Sakata (2018) that identified the existing parks in 14 cities and highlighted those established between 2000-2017. The parks were allocated on income distribution maps and data were collected on the latest parks on city hall websites, GoogleEarth images, newspaper articles, the reports of the workshops conducted by the Quapá-SEL research group and other surveys. Although the large traditional parks are the reference for the designers and the population, most of the new parks, established mainly from demands for environmental preservation, are inserted in contexts that are very different from those of the traditional parks and, therefore, they present other demands of uses. It is appropriate to review and extend the concept of urban park to cover these new figures, but mainly, it is necessary to re-evaluate the design criteria for the new parks and to increase the management of old and new ones. |
id |
USP-25_b21eb789d43338bb5447658a693c39bd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/155785 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-25 |
network_name_str |
Paisagem e Ambiente (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Um novo conceito para parque urbano no Brasil do século XXIA new concept for urban park in Brazil on the 21st. centuryUrban ParkPublic ParkLandscapingEnvironmental PreservationParque UrbanoParque PúblicoPaisagismoPreservação AmbientalThis article has the objective to show that urban parks established between 2000 and 2017 in Brazilian cities are different from the parks of the twentieth century and have created new design and management challenges. The great parks of the twentieth century were intended for the leisure of the urban masses and were made in central or housing areas of higher income segments. The new parks, largely, were made with less emphasis on leisure provision but, above all, on environmental conservation and are located in less-central neighborhoods or lower-income camps. The article develops from the work of Sakata (2018) that identified the existing parks in 14 cities and highlighted those established between 2000-2017. The parks were allocated on income distribution maps and data were collected on the latest parks on city hall websites, GoogleEarth images, newspaper articles, the reports of the workshops conducted by the Quapá-SEL research group and other surveys. Although the large traditional parks are the reference for the designers and the population, most of the new parks, established mainly from demands for environmental preservation, are inserted in contexts that are very different from those of the traditional parks and, therefore, they present other demands of uses. It is appropriate to review and extend the concept of urban park to cover these new figures, but mainly, it is necessary to re-evaluate the design criteria for the new parks and to increase the management of old and new ones.Este artigo visa mostrar que os parques urbanos implantados entre 2000 e 2017 em grandes cidades brasileiras são diferentes dos implantados no século XX, e criaram novos desafios de desenho e de gestão. Os grandes parques do século XX se destinavam ao lazer das massas urbanas e eram feitos em áreas centrais ou de moradia de camadas de rendas mais altas. Os novos parques, em boa parte, foram feitos com menos ênfase na provisão de lazer mas, sobretudo, pensando na conservação ambiental, e estão locados em bairros menos centrais ou de camadas de rendas mais baixas. O artigo se desenvolve a partir do trabalho de Sakata, que identificou os parques existentes em 14 cidades, destacando aqueles criados entre 2000 e 2017. Os parques foram alocados em mapas de distribuição de renda, e dados sobre os mais recentes foram coletados em sites das prefeituras, em imagens do Google Earth, em artigos de jornais, nos relatórios das oficinas realizadas pelo grupo de pesquisa Quadro do Paisagismo no Brasil – Sistemas de Espaços Livres (Quapá-SEL) e em outros trabalhos. Conclui-se que, ainda que os grandes parques tradicionais sejam a referência para os projetistas e a população, a maioria dos novos parques, criados principalmente a partir de demandas pela preservação ambiental, está inserida em contextos muito diferentes daqueles dos parques tradicionais e, por isso, apresenta outras demandas de uso. É conveniente, assim, rever e ampliar o conceito de parque urbano para abarcar essas novas figuras, mas é preciso, principalmente, reavaliar os critérios de desenho para os novos parques e incrementar a gestão de todo o conjunto. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo2019-10-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paam/article/view/15578510.11606/issn.2359-5361.paam.2019.155785Paisagem e Ambiente; Vol. 30 Núm. 43 (2019); e155785Paisagem e Ambiente; v. 30 n. 43 (2019); e155785Paisagem e Ambiente; Vol. 30 No. 43 (2019); e1557852359-53610104-6098reponame:Paisagem e Ambiente (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paam/article/view/155785/156629https://www.revistas.usp.br/paam/article/view/155785/156766Copyright (c) 2019 Francine Gramacho Sakata, Fabio Mariz Gonçalvesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSakata, Francine GramachoGonçalves, Fabio Mariz2019-11-16T16:33:08Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/155785Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/paam/indexPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/paam/oai||paisagismo@usp.br|| ssmduck@usp.br2359-53610104-6098opendoar:2023-09-13T12:17:13.046458Paisagem e Ambiente (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Um novo conceito para parque urbano no Brasil do século XXI A new concept for urban park in Brazil on the 21st. century |
title |
Um novo conceito para parque urbano no Brasil do século XXI |
spellingShingle |
Um novo conceito para parque urbano no Brasil do século XXI Sakata, Francine Gramacho Urban Park Public Park Landscaping Environmental Preservation Parque Urbano Parque Público Paisagismo Preservação Ambiental |
title_short |
Um novo conceito para parque urbano no Brasil do século XXI |
title_full |
Um novo conceito para parque urbano no Brasil do século XXI |
title_fullStr |
Um novo conceito para parque urbano no Brasil do século XXI |
title_full_unstemmed |
Um novo conceito para parque urbano no Brasil do século XXI |
title_sort |
Um novo conceito para parque urbano no Brasil do século XXI |
author |
Sakata, Francine Gramacho |
author_facet |
Sakata, Francine Gramacho Gonçalves, Fabio Mariz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gonçalves, Fabio Mariz |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sakata, Francine Gramacho Gonçalves, Fabio Mariz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Urban Park Public Park Landscaping Environmental Preservation Parque Urbano Parque Público Paisagismo Preservação Ambiental |
topic |
Urban Park Public Park Landscaping Environmental Preservation Parque Urbano Parque Público Paisagismo Preservação Ambiental |
description |
This article has the objective to show that urban parks established between 2000 and 2017 in Brazilian cities are different from the parks of the twentieth century and have created new design and management challenges. The great parks of the twentieth century were intended for the leisure of the urban masses and were made in central or housing areas of higher income segments. The new parks, largely, were made with less emphasis on leisure provision but, above all, on environmental conservation and are located in less-central neighborhoods or lower-income camps. The article develops from the work of Sakata (2018) that identified the existing parks in 14 cities and highlighted those established between 2000-2017. The parks were allocated on income distribution maps and data were collected on the latest parks on city hall websites, GoogleEarth images, newspaper articles, the reports of the workshops conducted by the Quapá-SEL research group and other surveys. Although the large traditional parks are the reference for the designers and the population, most of the new parks, established mainly from demands for environmental preservation, are inserted in contexts that are very different from those of the traditional parks and, therefore, they present other demands of uses. It is appropriate to review and extend the concept of urban park to cover these new figures, but mainly, it is necessary to re-evaluate the design criteria for the new parks and to increase the management of old and new ones. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paam/article/view/155785 10.11606/issn.2359-5361.paam.2019.155785 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paam/article/view/155785 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/issn.2359-5361.paam.2019.155785 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paam/article/view/155785/156629 https://www.revistas.usp.br/paam/article/view/155785/156766 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Francine Gramacho Sakata, Fabio Mariz Gonçalves info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Francine Gramacho Sakata, Fabio Mariz Gonçalves |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Paisagem e Ambiente; Vol. 30 Núm. 43 (2019); e155785 Paisagem e Ambiente; v. 30 n. 43 (2019); e155785 Paisagem e Ambiente; Vol. 30 No. 43 (2019); e155785 2359-5361 0104-6098 reponame:Paisagem e Ambiente (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Paisagem e Ambiente (Online) |
collection |
Paisagem e Ambiente (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Paisagem e Ambiente (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||paisagismo@usp.br|| ssmduck@usp.br |
_version_ |
1814253685705801728 |