Software process assessment and improvement using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/53061 |
Resumo: | Software process improvement and software process assessment have received special attention since the 1980s. Some models have been created, but these models rest on a normative approach, where the decision-maker's participation in a software organization is limited to understanding which process is more relevant to each organization. The proposal of this work is to present the MCDA-C as a constructivist methodology for software process improvement and assessment. The methodology makes it possible to visualize the criteria that must be taken into account according to the decision-makers' values in the process improvement actions, making it possible to rank actions in the light of specific organizational needs. This process helped the manager of the company studied to focus on and prioritize process improvement actions. This paper offers an empirical understanding of the application of performance evaluation to software process improvement and identifies complementary tools to the normative models presented today. |
id |
USP-33_2e8bcd4231bdfcb29d5df40f811c64b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/53061 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-33 |
network_name_str |
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Software process assessment and improvement using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist software process assessmentsoftware process improvementdecisionperformance measurementCMMISPICE Software process improvement and software process assessment have received special attention since the 1980s. Some models have been created, but these models rest on a normative approach, where the decision-maker's participation in a software organization is limited to understanding which process is more relevant to each organization. The proposal of this work is to present the MCDA-C as a constructivist methodology for software process improvement and assessment. The methodology makes it possible to visualize the criteria that must be taken into account according to the decision-makers' values in the process improvement actions, making it possible to rank actions in the light of specific organizational needs. This process helped the manager of the company studied to focus on and prioritize process improvement actions. This paper offers an empirical understanding of the application of performance evaluation to software process improvement and identifies complementary tools to the normative models presented today. TECSI - FEA - Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/5306110.4301/S1807-17752012000300003Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; v. 9 n. 3 (2012); 473-496Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2012); 473-496Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2012); 473-4961807-1775reponame:Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/53061/57114Copyright (c) 2018 JISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEnsslin, LeonardoScheid, Luiz Carlos MesquitaEnsslin, Sandra RolimLacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira2014-05-18T13:33:47Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/53061Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1807-1775&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jistem@usp.br1807-17751807-1775opendoar:2014-05-18T13:33:47Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Software process assessment and improvement using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist |
title |
Software process assessment and improvement using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist |
spellingShingle |
Software process assessment and improvement using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist Ensslin, Leonardo software process assessment software process improvement decision performance measurement CMMI SPICE |
title_short |
Software process assessment and improvement using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist |
title_full |
Software process assessment and improvement using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist |
title_fullStr |
Software process assessment and improvement using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist |
title_full_unstemmed |
Software process assessment and improvement using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist |
title_sort |
Software process assessment and improvement using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist |
author |
Ensslin, Leonardo |
author_facet |
Ensslin, Leonardo Scheid, Luiz Carlos Mesquita Ensslin, Sandra Rolim Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Scheid, Luiz Carlos Mesquita Ensslin, Sandra Rolim Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ensslin, Leonardo Scheid, Luiz Carlos Mesquita Ensslin, Sandra Rolim Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
software process assessment software process improvement decision performance measurement CMMI SPICE |
topic |
software process assessment software process improvement decision performance measurement CMMI SPICE |
description |
Software process improvement and software process assessment have received special attention since the 1980s. Some models have been created, but these models rest on a normative approach, where the decision-maker's participation in a software organization is limited to understanding which process is more relevant to each organization. The proposal of this work is to present the MCDA-C as a constructivist methodology for software process improvement and assessment. The methodology makes it possible to visualize the criteria that must be taken into account according to the decision-makers' values in the process improvement actions, making it possible to rank actions in the light of specific organizational needs. This process helped the manager of the company studied to focus on and prioritize process improvement actions. This paper offers an empirical understanding of the application of performance evaluation to software process improvement and identifies complementary tools to the normative models presented today. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/53061 10.4301/S1807-17752012000300003 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/53061 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4301/S1807-17752012000300003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/53061/57114 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 JISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 JISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
TECSI - FEA - Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
TECSI - FEA - Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; v. 9 n. 3 (2012); 473-496 Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2012); 473-496 Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2012); 473-496 1807-1775 reponame:Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) |
collection |
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jistem@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222952472444928 |