Academic production and technological emergence in finance: Bibliometric study on FinTechs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caciatori Junior, Itamir
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração e Inovação
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/177161
Resumo: Purpose – This paper aims to study the FinTech enterprises and the management theories related to this subject in a scientific way. Design/methodology/approach – This study is a bibliometric study on FinTech enterprises. Its origin is a survey of 1,749 papers in 6 traditional peer-reviewed academic databases (e.g. Science Direct and Scopus) and in the “gray” literature, published by other agents and not subject to double-blind peer review. In this analysis we use three approaches: academic paper or not; journal main interest, and main purpose of the paper. Findings – The first approach shows 45% of papers without blind review. The second approach shows no concentration on any journal. It represents no concentration on any kind of specific journal. And the third approach shows four kinds of contents in all researched papers: FinTech categorizations; FinTech related to theory of disruptive innovation; FinTech and theories of administration or economy; and finally, FinTech and regulatory and legislative aspects. Originality/value – The findings identified the emergence of new research strands, precedence of studies of “gray” literature to explain the phenomenon, distribution of studies in different fields of knowle
id USP-40_77151e979959ac89aa1f691de956cf13
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/177161
network_acronym_str USP-40
network_name_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository_id_str
spelling Academic production and technological emergence in finance: Bibliometric study on FinTechsFinTechsFinancial technologiesInnovationBibliometryGrey literaturePurpose – This paper aims to study the FinTech enterprises and the management theories related to this subject in a scientific way. Design/methodology/approach – This study is a bibliometric study on FinTech enterprises. Its origin is a survey of 1,749 papers in 6 traditional peer-reviewed academic databases (e.g. Science Direct and Scopus) and in the “gray” literature, published by other agents and not subject to double-blind peer review. In this analysis we use three approaches: academic paper or not; journal main interest, and main purpose of the paper. Findings – The first approach shows 45% of papers without blind review. The second approach shows no concentration on any journal. It represents no concentration on any kind of specific journal. And the third approach shows four kinds of contents in all researched papers: FinTech categorizations; FinTech related to theory of disruptive innovation; FinTech and theories of administration or economy; and finally, FinTech and regulatory and legislative aspects. Originality/value – The findings identified the emergence of new research strands, precedence of studies of “gray” literature to explain the phenomenon, distribution of studies in different fields of knowlePurpose – This paper aims to study the FinTech enterprises and the management theories related to this subject in a scientific way. Design/methodology/approach – This study is a bibliometric study on FinTech enterprises. Its origin is a survey of 1,749 papers in 6 traditional peer-reviewed academic databases (e.g. Science Direct and Scopus) and in the “gray” literature, published by other agents and not subject to double-blind peer review. In this analysis we use three approaches: academic paper or not; journal main interest, and main purpose of the paper. Findings – The first approach shows 45% of papers without blind review. The second approach shows no concentration on any journal. It represents no concentration on any kind of specific journal. And the third approach shows four kinds of contents in all researched papers: FinTech categorizations; FinTech related to theory of disruptive innovation; FinTech and theories of administration or economy; and finally, FinTech and regulatory and legislative aspects. Originality/value – The findings identified the emergence of new research strands, precedence of studies of “gray” literature to explain the phenomenon, distribution of studies in different fields of knowleUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade2020-11-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/17716110.1108/INMR-01-2019-0005INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 17 n. 2 (2020); 115;1312515-8961reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovaçãoinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/177161/164305https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaciatori Junior, Itamir Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula 2020-11-05T04:56:08Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/177161Revistahttp://www.viannajr.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/raiPUBhttp://www.revistas.usp.br/viaatlantica/oairevistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org1809-20391809-2039opendoar:2020-11-05T04:56:08Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Academic production and technological emergence in finance: Bibliometric study on FinTechs
title Academic production and technological emergence in finance: Bibliometric study on FinTechs
spellingShingle Academic production and technological emergence in finance: Bibliometric study on FinTechs
Caciatori Junior, Itamir
FinTechs
Financial technologies
Innovation
Bibliometry
Grey literature
title_short Academic production and technological emergence in finance: Bibliometric study on FinTechs
title_full Academic production and technological emergence in finance: Bibliometric study on FinTechs
title_fullStr Academic production and technological emergence in finance: Bibliometric study on FinTechs
title_full_unstemmed Academic production and technological emergence in finance: Bibliometric study on FinTechs
title_sort Academic production and technological emergence in finance: Bibliometric study on FinTechs
author Caciatori Junior, Itamir
author_facet Caciatori Junior, Itamir
Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula
author_role author
author2 Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caciatori Junior, Itamir
Mussi Szabo Cherobim, Ana Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv FinTechs
Financial technologies
Innovation
Bibliometry
Grey literature
topic FinTechs
Financial technologies
Innovation
Bibliometry
Grey literature
description Purpose – This paper aims to study the FinTech enterprises and the management theories related to this subject in a scientific way. Design/methodology/approach – This study is a bibliometric study on FinTech enterprises. Its origin is a survey of 1,749 papers in 6 traditional peer-reviewed academic databases (e.g. Science Direct and Scopus) and in the “gray” literature, published by other agents and not subject to double-blind peer review. In this analysis we use three approaches: academic paper or not; journal main interest, and main purpose of the paper. Findings – The first approach shows 45% of papers without blind review. The second approach shows no concentration on any journal. It represents no concentration on any kind of specific journal. And the third approach shows four kinds of contents in all researched papers: FinTech categorizations; FinTech related to theory of disruptive innovation; FinTech and theories of administration or economy; and finally, FinTech and regulatory and legislative aspects. Originality/value – The findings identified the emergence of new research strands, precedence of studies of “gray” literature to explain the phenomenon, distribution of studies in different fields of knowle
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/177161
10.1108/INMR-01-2019-0005
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/177161
identifier_str_mv 10.1108/INMR-01-2019-0005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/177161/164305
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv INMR - Innovation & Management Review; v. 17 n. 2 (2020); 115;131
2515-8961
reponame:Revista de Administração e Inovação
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Administração e Inovação
collection Revista de Administração e Inovação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração e Inovação - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistarai@usp.br||tatianepgt@revistarai.org
_version_ 1800221937376428032

Registros relacionados