Entre Deus e o diabo: mercados e interação humana nas ciências sociais
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2004 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Tempo Social (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/ts/article/view/12435 |
Resumo: | The main characteristic of new economic sociology, which has been mor and more prestiged in the USA and Europe recently, is to study markets as social constructions rather than as abstract balance mechanisms. Far from opposing to economic science procedures, this trend is shared by some of its most influential exponents. It is true that contemporary economics corresponds to the widely believed reputation that it is a grey and mechanical science, unable to incorporate ethical principles to its basis. However, an important part of economics is geared towards the study of concrete ways of social interaction, and questions the merelyselfish and maximizing motivations axiomatically postulated by the neoclassical tradition. Among these currents new institutional economics stands out. Its issues are the object of new economic sociology. In spite of their different approaches, both contribute to prevent markets from being faced as magical solutions to all social problems or as demonized ways of interaction which human emancipation will eventually do away it. |
id |
USP-41_292cca06eebe87df100b10ccf62db0d8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/12435 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-41 |
network_name_str |
Tempo Social (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Entre Deus e o diabo: mercados e interação humana nas ciências sociais Between Good and evil: markets and human interaction in the social sciences Nova sociologia econômicaNova economia institucionalInteração socialMercadosInterdisciplinaridadeNew economic sociologyNew institutional economicsSocial interactionMarketsInterdisciplinarity The main characteristic of new economic sociology, which has been mor and more prestiged in the USA and Europe recently, is to study markets as social constructions rather than as abstract balance mechanisms. Far from opposing to economic science procedures, this trend is shared by some of its most influential exponents. It is true that contemporary economics corresponds to the widely believed reputation that it is a grey and mechanical science, unable to incorporate ethical principles to its basis. However, an important part of economics is geared towards the study of concrete ways of social interaction, and questions the merelyselfish and maximizing motivations axiomatically postulated by the neoclassical tradition. Among these currents new institutional economics stands out. Its issues are the object of new economic sociology. In spite of their different approaches, both contribute to prevent markets from being faced as magical solutions to all social problems or as demonized ways of interaction which human emancipation will eventually do away it. A principal característica da nova sociologia econômica, que ganha prestígio crescente nos Estados Unidos e na Europa, é estudar os mercados não como mecanismos abstratos de equilíbrio, mas como construções sociais. Essa orientação, entretanto, longe de opor-se aos procedimentos da ciência econômica, é também partilhada por alguns de seus mais importantes expoentes. É bem verdade que a economia contemporânea faz jus à reputação tão difundida de ciência cinzenta, mecânica e incapaz de incorporar preceitos éticos a seus pressupostos. Mas parte importante e cada vez mais significativa da disciplina se volta justamente ao estudo de formas concretas de interação social e questiona as motivações puramente egoístas e maximizadoras postuladas axiomaticamente pela tradição neoclássica. Entre essas correntes destaca-se a nova economia institucional, cujos temas são objeto também da nova sociologia econômica. Apesar de suas diferenças de abordagem, ambas contribuem para evitar que mercados sejam encarados como soluções mágicas a todos os problemas sociais ou como formas diabolizadas de interação que a emancipação humana acabará um dia por suprimir.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas2004-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ts/article/view/1243510.1590/S0103-20702004000200002Tempo Social; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2004); 35-64Tempo Social; v. 16 n. 2 (2004); 35-64Tempo Social; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2004); 35-641809-45540103-2070reponame:Tempo Social (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ts/article/view/12435/14212Copyright (c) 2015 Tempo Socialhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbramovay, Ricardo2023-06-15T12:33:57Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/12435Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ts/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptemposoc@edu.usp.br1809-45540103-2070opendoar:2023-06-15T12:33:57Tempo Social (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Entre Deus e o diabo: mercados e interação humana nas ciências sociais Between Good and evil: markets and human interaction in the social sciences |
title |
Entre Deus e o diabo: mercados e interação humana nas ciências sociais |
spellingShingle |
Entre Deus e o diabo: mercados e interação humana nas ciências sociais Abramovay, Ricardo Nova sociologia econômica Nova economia institucional Interação social Mercados Interdisciplinaridade New economic sociology New institutional economics Social interaction Markets Interdisciplinarity |
title_short |
Entre Deus e o diabo: mercados e interação humana nas ciências sociais |
title_full |
Entre Deus e o diabo: mercados e interação humana nas ciências sociais |
title_fullStr |
Entre Deus e o diabo: mercados e interação humana nas ciências sociais |
title_full_unstemmed |
Entre Deus e o diabo: mercados e interação humana nas ciências sociais |
title_sort |
Entre Deus e o diabo: mercados e interação humana nas ciências sociais |
author |
Abramovay, Ricardo |
author_facet |
Abramovay, Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abramovay, Ricardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nova sociologia econômica Nova economia institucional Interação social Mercados Interdisciplinaridade New economic sociology New institutional economics Social interaction Markets Interdisciplinarity |
topic |
Nova sociologia econômica Nova economia institucional Interação social Mercados Interdisciplinaridade New economic sociology New institutional economics Social interaction Markets Interdisciplinarity |
description |
The main characteristic of new economic sociology, which has been mor and more prestiged in the USA and Europe recently, is to study markets as social constructions rather than as abstract balance mechanisms. Far from opposing to economic science procedures, this trend is shared by some of its most influential exponents. It is true that contemporary economics corresponds to the widely believed reputation that it is a grey and mechanical science, unable to incorporate ethical principles to its basis. However, an important part of economics is geared towards the study of concrete ways of social interaction, and questions the merelyselfish and maximizing motivations axiomatically postulated by the neoclassical tradition. Among these currents new institutional economics stands out. Its issues are the object of new economic sociology. In spite of their different approaches, both contribute to prevent markets from being faced as magical solutions to all social problems or as demonized ways of interaction which human emancipation will eventually do away it. |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-11-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ts/article/view/12435 10.1590/S0103-20702004000200002 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ts/article/view/12435 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-20702004000200002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ts/article/view/12435/14212 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Tempo Social http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Tempo Social http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Tempo Social; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2004); 35-64 Tempo Social; v. 16 n. 2 (2004); 35-64 Tempo Social; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2004); 35-64 1809-4554 0103-2070 reponame:Tempo Social (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Tempo Social (Online) |
collection |
Tempo Social (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Tempo Social (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
temposoc@edu.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221913436389376 |