Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crespilho, André Maciel
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Bosco, Karinne Ávila, Dell'Aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas, Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido, Papa, Frederico Ozanam, Brás, Karoline Maria Gil, Gomes, Gustavo Mendes, Peixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/145873
Resumo: Protocols for cooling or freezing goat semen usually recommend centrifugation for seminal plasma removal. However, little is known about the effect of this process on goat sperm viability and functionality. The present study evaluated the effects of centrifugation force on the plasma membrane, acrosomes, and DNA integrity of goat semen. Four ejaculates from each of the four different Anglo Nubian male goats were used. Semen samples were obtained using artificial vagina, and immediately after collection, ejaculates were diluted using Ringer’s sodium lactate solution and split into three groups: Control (CG, without centrifugation), G1 (centrifugation 600 x g/10 min), G2 (centrifugation 1200 x g/10 min). After centrifugation, seminal plasma was removed, the sperm pellets were resuspended using Tris-egg yolk extender (80 x 106 spermatozoa/mL) and the sperm morphology was analyzed. Samples were cooled at 5°C for 5, 24, 36, and 48 h and then sperm plasma membrane and acrosome integrity (PMAI, %) and sperm DNA fragmentation index (SDF, %) were evaluated at each time-point, using a flow cytometer. Additionally, sperm movement was determined using computer semen analysis (CASA) after 5, 24, and 48 h of refrigeration period. The semen centrifugation did not induce additional sperm morphology defect or reduction in sperm kinetics in the experimental groups. Differences were not observed (p > 0.05) in PMAI and SDF among different groups, in any of each timepointof the cooling process. In conclusion, centrifugation, even at high speeds, did not affect goat sperm integrity and functionality when submitted to refrigeration process.
id USP-49_37f0bcae871b9b55148bad94f5aaaea1
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/145873
network_acronym_str USP-49
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
repository_id_str https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/index
spelling Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?A força de centrifugação pode comprometer a integridade de membrana plasmática, acrossomal e DNA de espermatozoides caprinos?CentrifugationGoatIntegritySemenViabilityCaprinoCentrifugaçãoIntegridadeSêmenViabilidadeProtocols for cooling or freezing goat semen usually recommend centrifugation for seminal plasma removal. However, little is known about the effect of this process on goat sperm viability and functionality. The present study evaluated the effects of centrifugation force on the plasma membrane, acrosomes, and DNA integrity of goat semen. Four ejaculates from each of the four different Anglo Nubian male goats were used. Semen samples were obtained using artificial vagina, and immediately after collection, ejaculates were diluted using Ringer’s sodium lactate solution and split into three groups: Control (CG, without centrifugation), G1 (centrifugation 600 x g/10 min), G2 (centrifugation 1200 x g/10 min). After centrifugation, seminal plasma was removed, the sperm pellets were resuspended using Tris-egg yolk extender (80 x 106 spermatozoa/mL) and the sperm morphology was analyzed. Samples were cooled at 5°C for 5, 24, 36, and 48 h and then sperm plasma membrane and acrosome integrity (PMAI, %) and sperm DNA fragmentation index (SDF, %) were evaluated at each time-point, using a flow cytometer. Additionally, sperm movement was determined using computer semen analysis (CASA) after 5, 24, and 48 h of refrigeration period. The semen centrifugation did not induce additional sperm morphology defect or reduction in sperm kinetics in the experimental groups. Differences were not observed (p > 0.05) in PMAI and SDF among different groups, in any of each timepointof the cooling process. In conclusion, centrifugation, even at high speeds, did not affect goat sperm integrity and functionality when submitted to refrigeration process.A maior parte dos protocolos de refrigeração e criopreservação do sêmen caprino recomenda o uso de centrifugação para remoção do plasma seminal. No entanto, não existe consenso sobre o risco que esse tipo de processamento pode ocasionar à viabilidade espermática. Nesse contexto, o presente trabalho investigou os possíveis efeitos deletérios da centrifugação sobre a integridade estrutural e DNA de espermatozoides caprinos. Para a pesquisa foram selecionados quatro reprodutores para colheita de sêmen (n = 4 ejaculados/bode). Cada ejaculado foi fracionado em três alíquotas iguais, diluídas em ringer e divididas em três grupos: Controle (GC, não centrifugado), G1 (centrifugação a 600 g/10 minutos) e G2 (centrifugação a 1200 g/10 minutos). As amostras seminais por grupo foram diluídas em meio Tris gema respeitando-se a concentração final de 80 milhões de espermatozoides/mL e foram submetidas à avaliação de morfologia espermática. Todas as amostras foram acondicionadas a 5°C, sendo analisadas nos momentos 5, 24, 36 e 48 horas do processo de refrigeração por meio da avaliação da integridade de membrana plasmática e acrossomal (MPAI, %) e índice de fragmentação de DNA (IDF, %). Adicionalmente, a cinética espermática foi avaliada com o emprego de um sistema computadorizado de análise (CASA) nos momentos 5, 24 e 48 horas da refrigeração. A centrifugação não induziu a manifestação de defeitos morfológicos ou redução significativa da cinética de espermatozoides caprinos. Não foram observadas diferenças para a integridade de membrana plasmática e para o índice de fragmentação de DNA quando comparados, respectivamente, GC, G1 e G2 em cada um dos quatro momentos experimentais. Conclui-se que mesmo quando empregadas altas forças de rotação não ocorre lesão à ultraestrutura dos espermatozoides caprinos submetidos ao processo de refrigeração.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia2018-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/14587310.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 55 Núm. 3 (2018); e145873Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 55 No. 3 (2018); e145873Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; v. 55 n. 3 (2018); e145873Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; V. 55 N. 3 (2018); e1458731678-44561413-9596reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Scienceinstname:Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/145873/149058Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCrespilho, André MacielBosco, Karinne ÁvilaDell'Aqua, Camila de Paula FreitasSegabinazzi, Lorenzo GarridoPapa, Frederico OzanamBrás, Karoline Maria GilGomes, Gustavo MendesPeixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha2020-06-23T04:02:50Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/145873Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvrasPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/oaibjvras@usp.br1413-95961413-9596opendoar:https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/index2023-01-12T16:44:02.087634Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
A força de centrifugação pode comprometer a integridade de membrana plasmática, acrossomal e DNA de espermatozoides caprinos?
title Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
spellingShingle Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
Crespilho, André Maciel
Centrifugation
Goat
Integrity
Semen
Viability
Caprino
Centrifugação
Integridade
Sêmen
Viabilidade
title_short Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
title_full Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
title_fullStr Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
title_full_unstemmed Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
title_sort Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
author Crespilho, André Maciel
author_facet Crespilho, André Maciel
Bosco, Karinne Ávila
Dell'Aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas
Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido
Papa, Frederico Ozanam
Brás, Karoline Maria Gil
Gomes, Gustavo Mendes
Peixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha
author_role author
author2 Bosco, Karinne Ávila
Dell'Aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas
Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido
Papa, Frederico Ozanam
Brás, Karoline Maria Gil
Gomes, Gustavo Mendes
Peixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crespilho, André Maciel
Bosco, Karinne Ávila
Dell'Aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas
Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido
Papa, Frederico Ozanam
Brás, Karoline Maria Gil
Gomes, Gustavo Mendes
Peixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Centrifugation
Goat
Integrity
Semen
Viability
Caprino
Centrifugação
Integridade
Sêmen
Viabilidade
topic Centrifugation
Goat
Integrity
Semen
Viability
Caprino
Centrifugação
Integridade
Sêmen
Viabilidade
description Protocols for cooling or freezing goat semen usually recommend centrifugation for seminal plasma removal. However, little is known about the effect of this process on goat sperm viability and functionality. The present study evaluated the effects of centrifugation force on the plasma membrane, acrosomes, and DNA integrity of goat semen. Four ejaculates from each of the four different Anglo Nubian male goats were used. Semen samples were obtained using artificial vagina, and immediately after collection, ejaculates were diluted using Ringer’s sodium lactate solution and split into three groups: Control (CG, without centrifugation), G1 (centrifugation 600 x g/10 min), G2 (centrifugation 1200 x g/10 min). After centrifugation, seminal plasma was removed, the sperm pellets were resuspended using Tris-egg yolk extender (80 x 106 spermatozoa/mL) and the sperm morphology was analyzed. Samples were cooled at 5°C for 5, 24, 36, and 48 h and then sperm plasma membrane and acrosome integrity (PMAI, %) and sperm DNA fragmentation index (SDF, %) were evaluated at each time-point, using a flow cytometer. Additionally, sperm movement was determined using computer semen analysis (CASA) after 5, 24, and 48 h of refrigeration period. The semen centrifugation did not induce additional sperm morphology defect or reduction in sperm kinetics in the experimental groups. Differences were not observed (p > 0.05) in PMAI and SDF among different groups, in any of each timepointof the cooling process. In conclusion, centrifugation, even at high speeds, did not affect goat sperm integrity and functionality when submitted to refrigeration process.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/145873
10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/145873
identifier_str_mv 10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/145873/149058
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 55 Núm. 3 (2018); e145873
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 55 No. 3 (2018); e145873
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; v. 55 n. 3 (2018); e145873
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; V. 55 N. 3 (2018); e145873
1678-4456
1413-9596
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
instname:Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
collection Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjvras@usp.br
_version_ 1797051567333965824