The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26465 |
Resumo: | This study was performed to standardize parasite egg counting in feces of sheep by TF-Test, in addition to compare this test to the Gordon & Whitlock technique (G&W). Twenty-four lambs were artificially infected with Haemonchus contortus throughout 12 weeks. At the end of this time, faecal samples were taken and animals were slaughtered for worm identification and counting. G&W and TF-Test methods were carried out on each fecal sample. Both tests showed Haemonchus eggs in 95.8% of the samples (P>;0.05). The correlation coefficients (r) between fecal egg counts (FEC) using G&W x Total Worm Count (TWC) were r=0.52 (not transformed data) and r=0.85 (transformed data); between FEC by TF-Test x TWC were r=0.51 (not transformed data) and r=0.87 (transformed data). Other 100 fecal samples were taken from naturally infected sheep. In these animals, the G&W and TF-Test methods showed 85% and 86% of fecal samples positive for Strongylidea eggs, respectively (P>;0.05). Also in those animals, Eimeria oocysts were found in 33% of fecal samples by TF-Test, whereas in the G&W only 12% were positive (P<0.001). For Strongyloides spp., TF-Test showed 15% of positive fecal samples, whereas G&W showed 5% (P<0.05). In conclusion, both methods were efficient to diagnose gastrointestinal nematodes and TF-Test was superior to diagnose oocysts of Eimeria spp. and eggs of Strongyloides spp; conversely, Strongylidea eggs counting using TF-Test was underestimated. |
id |
USP-49_50f8a536990f37300eda9cf59d758a7e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/26465 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-49 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science |
repository_id_str |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/index |
spelling |
The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheepAvaliação do kit "TF-Test" para o diagnóstico das infecções por parasitas gastrintestinais em ovinosDiagnósticoHaemonchus contortusOPGOvinosTF-TestDiagnosticFECHaemonchus contortusSheepTF-TestThis study was performed to standardize parasite egg counting in feces of sheep by TF-Test, in addition to compare this test to the Gordon & Whitlock technique (G&W). Twenty-four lambs were artificially infected with Haemonchus contortus throughout 12 weeks. At the end of this time, faecal samples were taken and animals were slaughtered for worm identification and counting. G&W and TF-Test methods were carried out on each fecal sample. Both tests showed Haemonchus eggs in 95.8% of the samples (P>;0.05). The correlation coefficients (r) between fecal egg counts (FEC) using G&W x Total Worm Count (TWC) were r=0.52 (not transformed data) and r=0.85 (transformed data); between FEC by TF-Test x TWC were r=0.51 (not transformed data) and r=0.87 (transformed data). Other 100 fecal samples were taken from naturally infected sheep. In these animals, the G&W and TF-Test methods showed 85% and 86% of fecal samples positive for Strongylidea eggs, respectively (P>;0.05). Also in those animals, Eimeria oocysts were found in 33% of fecal samples by TF-Test, whereas in the G&W only 12% were positive (P<0.001). For Strongyloides spp., TF-Test showed 15% of positive fecal samples, whereas G&W showed 5% (P<0.05). In conclusion, both methods were efficient to diagnose gastrointestinal nematodes and TF-Test was superior to diagnose oocysts of Eimeria spp. and eggs of Strongyloides spp; conversely, Strongylidea eggs counting using TF-Test was underestimated.Este estudo teve como objetivos padronizar o kit TF-Test para a quantificação de ovos de parasitas gastrintestinais de ovinos e compará-lo ao método de Gordon & Whitlock modificado (G&W). Vinte quatro cordeiros confinados foram infectados artificialmente com Haemonchus contortus, durante 12 semanas, até o abate, quando foram colhidas amostras fecais e realizada a identificação e contagem dos parasitas abomasais. Nestes animais, ovos de H. contortus foram detectados em 95,8% das amostras fecais por ambos os testes (P>;0,05). Os coeficientes de correlação (r) entre a carga parasitária (CP) e os valores de OPG obtidos pelos métodos de G&W e TF-Test foram, respectivamente, de r=0,52 e r=0,51 (dados não transformados) e r=0,85 e r=0,87 (dados transformados em log). Outras 100 amostras fecais foram colhidas de ovinos naturalmente infectados. Nas amostras destes animais, os testes G&W e TF-Test propiciaram o diagnóstico de ovos de estrongilídeos em 85% e 86% das amostras, respectivamente (P>;0,05). Pelo TF-Test e pelo G&W, oocistos de Eimeria foram detectados em 33% e em 12% das amostras (P<0,001) e ovos de Strongyloides spp. em 15% e 5% das amostras, respectivamente (P<0,05). Ambos os testes foram precisos para o diagnóstico de estrongilídeos gastrintestinais, porém, o TF-Test foi superior para o diagnóstico de oocistos de Eimeria spp. e de ovos de Strongyloides spp., mas, por outro lado, subestimou o número de ovos de estrongilídeos presente nas amostras.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia2006-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/2646510.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2006.26465Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 43 Núm. 4 (2006); 496-501Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 43 No. 4 (2006); 496-501Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; v. 43 n. 4 (2006); 496-501Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; V. 43 N. 4 (2006); 496-5011678-44561413-9596reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Scienceinstname:Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26465/28248Lumina, GiulianoBricarello, Patrizia AnaGomes, Jancarlo FerreiraAmarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini doinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-06-23T04:17:28Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/26465Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvrasPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/oaibjvras@usp.br1413-95961413-9596opendoar:https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/index2023-01-12T16:42:44.942646Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep Avaliação do kit "TF-Test" para o diagnóstico das infecções por parasitas gastrintestinais em ovinos |
title |
The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep |
spellingShingle |
The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep Lumina, Giuliano Diagnóstico Haemonchus contortus OPG Ovinos TF-Test Diagnostic FEC Haemonchus contortus Sheep TF-Test |
title_short |
The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep |
title_full |
The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep |
title_fullStr |
The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep |
title_full_unstemmed |
The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep |
title_sort |
The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep |
author |
Lumina, Giuliano |
author_facet |
Lumina, Giuliano Bricarello, Patrizia Ana Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira Amarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bricarello, Patrizia Ana Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira Amarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lumina, Giuliano Bricarello, Patrizia Ana Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira Amarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Diagnóstico Haemonchus contortus OPG Ovinos TF-Test Diagnostic FEC Haemonchus contortus Sheep TF-Test |
topic |
Diagnóstico Haemonchus contortus OPG Ovinos TF-Test Diagnostic FEC Haemonchus contortus Sheep TF-Test |
description |
This study was performed to standardize parasite egg counting in feces of sheep by TF-Test, in addition to compare this test to the Gordon & Whitlock technique (G&W). Twenty-four lambs were artificially infected with Haemonchus contortus throughout 12 weeks. At the end of this time, faecal samples were taken and animals were slaughtered for worm identification and counting. G&W and TF-Test methods were carried out on each fecal sample. Both tests showed Haemonchus eggs in 95.8% of the samples (P>;0.05). The correlation coefficients (r) between fecal egg counts (FEC) using G&W x Total Worm Count (TWC) were r=0.52 (not transformed data) and r=0.85 (transformed data); between FEC by TF-Test x TWC were r=0.51 (not transformed data) and r=0.87 (transformed data). Other 100 fecal samples were taken from naturally infected sheep. In these animals, the G&W and TF-Test methods showed 85% and 86% of fecal samples positive for Strongylidea eggs, respectively (P>;0.05). Also in those animals, Eimeria oocysts were found in 33% of fecal samples by TF-Test, whereas in the G&W only 12% were positive (P<0.001). For Strongyloides spp., TF-Test showed 15% of positive fecal samples, whereas G&W showed 5% (P<0.05). In conclusion, both methods were efficient to diagnose gastrointestinal nematodes and TF-Test was superior to diagnose oocysts of Eimeria spp. and eggs of Strongyloides spp; conversely, Strongylidea eggs counting using TF-Test was underestimated. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26465 10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2006.26465 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26465 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2006.26465 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26465/28248 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 43 Núm. 4 (2006); 496-501 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 43 No. 4 (2006); 496-501 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; v. 43 n. 4 (2006); 496-501 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; V. 43 N. 4 (2006); 496-501 1678-4456 1413-9596 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science instname:Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjvras@usp.br |
_version_ |
1797051557657706496 |