The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lumina, Giuliano
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Bricarello, Patrizia Ana, Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira, Amarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26465
Resumo: This study was performed to standardize parasite egg counting in feces of sheep by TF-Test, in addition to compare this test to the Gordon & Whitlock technique (G&W). Twenty-four lambs were artificially infected with Haemonchus contortus throughout 12 weeks. At the end of this time, faecal samples were taken and animals were slaughtered for worm identification and counting. G&W and TF-Test methods were carried out on each fecal sample. Both tests showed Haemonchus eggs in 95.8% of the samples (P>;0.05). The correlation coefficients (r) between fecal egg counts (FEC) using G&W x Total Worm Count (TWC) were r=0.52 (not transformed data) and r=0.85 (transformed data); between FEC by TF-Test x TWC were r=0.51 (not transformed data) and r=0.87 (transformed data). Other 100 fecal samples were taken from naturally infected sheep. In these animals, the G&W and TF-Test methods showed 85% and 86% of fecal samples positive for Strongylidea eggs, respectively (P>;0.05). Also in those animals, Eimeria oocysts were found in 33% of fecal samples by TF-Test, whereas in the G&W only 12% were positive (P<0.001). For Strongyloides spp., TF-Test showed 15% of positive fecal samples, whereas G&W showed 5% (P<0.05). In conclusion, both methods were efficient to diagnose gastrointestinal nematodes and TF-Test was superior to diagnose oocysts of Eimeria spp. and eggs of Strongyloides spp; conversely, Strongylidea eggs counting using TF-Test was underestimated.
id USP-49_50f8a536990f37300eda9cf59d758a7e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/26465
network_acronym_str USP-49
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
repository_id_str https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/index
spelling The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheepAvaliação do kit "TF-Test" para o diagnóstico das infecções por parasitas gastrintestinais em ovinosDiagnósticoHaemonchus contortusOPGOvinosTF-TestDiagnosticFECHaemonchus contortusSheepTF-TestThis study was performed to standardize parasite egg counting in feces of sheep by TF-Test, in addition to compare this test to the Gordon & Whitlock technique (G&W). Twenty-four lambs were artificially infected with Haemonchus contortus throughout 12 weeks. At the end of this time, faecal samples were taken and animals were slaughtered for worm identification and counting. G&W and TF-Test methods were carried out on each fecal sample. Both tests showed Haemonchus eggs in 95.8% of the samples (P>;0.05). The correlation coefficients (r) between fecal egg counts (FEC) using G&W x Total Worm Count (TWC) were r=0.52 (not transformed data) and r=0.85 (transformed data); between FEC by TF-Test x TWC were r=0.51 (not transformed data) and r=0.87 (transformed data). Other 100 fecal samples were taken from naturally infected sheep. In these animals, the G&W and TF-Test methods showed 85% and 86% of fecal samples positive for Strongylidea eggs, respectively (P>;0.05). Also in those animals, Eimeria oocysts were found in 33% of fecal samples by TF-Test, whereas in the G&W only 12% were positive (P<0.001). For Strongyloides spp., TF-Test showed 15% of positive fecal samples, whereas G&W showed 5% (P<0.05). In conclusion, both methods were efficient to diagnose gastrointestinal nematodes and TF-Test was superior to diagnose oocysts of Eimeria spp. and eggs of Strongyloides spp; conversely, Strongylidea eggs counting using TF-Test was underestimated.Este estudo teve como objetivos padronizar o kit TF-Test para a quantificação de ovos de parasitas gastrintestinais de ovinos e compará-lo ao método de Gordon & Whitlock modificado (G&W). Vinte quatro cordeiros confinados foram infectados artificialmente com Haemonchus contortus, durante 12 semanas, até o abate, quando foram colhidas amostras fecais e realizada a identificação e contagem dos parasitas abomasais. Nestes animais, ovos de H. contortus foram detectados em 95,8% das amostras fecais por ambos os testes (P>;0,05). Os coeficientes de correlação (r) entre a carga parasitária (CP) e os valores de OPG obtidos pelos métodos de G&W e TF-Test foram, respectivamente, de r=0,52 e r=0,51 (dados não transformados) e r=0,85 e r=0,87 (dados transformados em log). Outras 100 amostras fecais foram colhidas de ovinos naturalmente infectados. Nas amostras destes animais, os testes G&W e TF-Test propiciaram o diagnóstico de ovos de estrongilídeos em 85% e 86% das amostras, respectivamente (P>;0,05). Pelo TF-Test e pelo G&W, oocistos de Eimeria foram detectados em 33% e em 12% das amostras (P<0,001) e ovos de Strongyloides spp. em 15% e 5% das amostras, respectivamente (P<0,05). Ambos os testes foram precisos para o diagnóstico de estrongilídeos gastrintestinais, porém, o TF-Test foi superior para o diagnóstico de oocistos de Eimeria spp. e de ovos de Strongyloides spp., mas, por outro lado, subestimou o número de ovos de estrongilídeos presente nas amostras.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia2006-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/2646510.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2006.26465Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 43 Núm. 4 (2006); 496-501Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 43 No. 4 (2006); 496-501Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; v. 43 n. 4 (2006); 496-501Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; V. 43 N. 4 (2006); 496-5011678-44561413-9596reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Scienceinstname:Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26465/28248Lumina, GiulianoBricarello, Patrizia AnaGomes, Jancarlo FerreiraAmarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini doinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-06-23T04:17:28Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/26465Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvrasPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/oaibjvras@usp.br1413-95961413-9596opendoar:https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/index2023-01-12T16:42:44.942646Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep
Avaliação do kit "TF-Test" para o diagnóstico das infecções por parasitas gastrintestinais em ovinos
title The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep
spellingShingle The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep
Lumina, Giuliano
Diagnóstico
Haemonchus contortus
OPG
Ovinos
TF-Test
Diagnostic
FEC
Haemonchus contortus
Sheep
TF-Test
title_short The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep
title_full The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep
title_fullStr The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep
title_sort The evaluation of "TF-Test" kit for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasite infections in sheep
author Lumina, Giuliano
author_facet Lumina, Giuliano
Bricarello, Patrizia Ana
Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira
Amarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do
author_role author
author2 Bricarello, Patrizia Ana
Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira
Amarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lumina, Giuliano
Bricarello, Patrizia Ana
Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira
Amarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diagnóstico
Haemonchus contortus
OPG
Ovinos
TF-Test
Diagnostic
FEC
Haemonchus contortus
Sheep
TF-Test
topic Diagnóstico
Haemonchus contortus
OPG
Ovinos
TF-Test
Diagnostic
FEC
Haemonchus contortus
Sheep
TF-Test
description This study was performed to standardize parasite egg counting in feces of sheep by TF-Test, in addition to compare this test to the Gordon & Whitlock technique (G&W). Twenty-four lambs were artificially infected with Haemonchus contortus throughout 12 weeks. At the end of this time, faecal samples were taken and animals were slaughtered for worm identification and counting. G&W and TF-Test methods were carried out on each fecal sample. Both tests showed Haemonchus eggs in 95.8% of the samples (P>;0.05). The correlation coefficients (r) between fecal egg counts (FEC) using G&W x Total Worm Count (TWC) were r=0.52 (not transformed data) and r=0.85 (transformed data); between FEC by TF-Test x TWC were r=0.51 (not transformed data) and r=0.87 (transformed data). Other 100 fecal samples were taken from naturally infected sheep. In these animals, the G&W and TF-Test methods showed 85% and 86% of fecal samples positive for Strongylidea eggs, respectively (P>;0.05). Also in those animals, Eimeria oocysts were found in 33% of fecal samples by TF-Test, whereas in the G&W only 12% were positive (P<0.001). For Strongyloides spp., TF-Test showed 15% of positive fecal samples, whereas G&W showed 5% (P<0.05). In conclusion, both methods were efficient to diagnose gastrointestinal nematodes and TF-Test was superior to diagnose oocysts of Eimeria spp. and eggs of Strongyloides spp; conversely, Strongylidea eggs counting using TF-Test was underestimated.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26465
10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2006.26465
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26465
identifier_str_mv 10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2006.26465
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26465/28248
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 43 Núm. 4 (2006); 496-501
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 43 No. 4 (2006); 496-501
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; v. 43 n. 4 (2006); 496-501
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; V. 43 N. 4 (2006); 496-501
1678-4456
1413-9596
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
instname:Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
collection Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjvras@usp.br
_version_ 1797051557657706496