Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sobrado,Carlos Walter
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Kiss,Desidério Roberto, Nahas,Sérgio C., Araújo,Sérgio E. A., Seid,Victor E., Cotti,Guilherme, Habr-Gama,Angelita
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista do Hospital das Clínicas
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000400003
Resumo: The "best" surgical technique for the management of complete rectal prolapse remains unknown. Due to its low incidence, it is very difficult to achieve a representative number of cases, and there are no large prospective randomized trials to attest to the superiority of one operation over another. PURPOSE: Analyze the results of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse during 1980 and 2002. METHOD: Retrospective study. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent surgical treatment during this period. The mean age was 56.7 years, with 39 females. Besides the prolapse itself, 33 patients complained of mucous discharge, 31 of fecal incontinence, 14 of constipation, 17 of rectal bleeding, and 3 of urinary incontinence. Abdominal operations were performed in 36 (71%) cases. Presacral rectopexy was the most common abdominal procedure (29 cases) followed by presacral rectopexy associated with sigmoidectomy (5 cases). The most common perineal procedure was perineal rectosigmoidectomy associated with levatorplasty (12 cases). Intraoperative bleeding from the presacral space developed in 2 cases, and a rectovaginal fistula occurred in another patient after a perineal rectosigmoidectomy. There were 2 recurrences after a mean follow-up of 49 months, which were treated by reoperation. CONCLUSION: Abdominal and perineal procedures can be used to manage complete rectal prolapse with safety and good long-term results. Age, associated medical conditions, and symptoms of fecal incontinence or constipation are the main features that one should bear in mind in order to choose the best surgical approach.
id USP-57_0fa1eec3a7335e2dc70101888ce0fc59
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0041-87812004000400003
network_acronym_str USP-57
network_name_str Revista do Hospital das Clínicas
repository_id_str
spelling Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patientsRectal ProlapseRectal ProcidenciaSurgeryRectopexyThe "best" surgical technique for the management of complete rectal prolapse remains unknown. Due to its low incidence, it is very difficult to achieve a representative number of cases, and there are no large prospective randomized trials to attest to the superiority of one operation over another. PURPOSE: Analyze the results of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse during 1980 and 2002. METHOD: Retrospective study. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent surgical treatment during this period. The mean age was 56.7 years, with 39 females. Besides the prolapse itself, 33 patients complained of mucous discharge, 31 of fecal incontinence, 14 of constipation, 17 of rectal bleeding, and 3 of urinary incontinence. Abdominal operations were performed in 36 (71%) cases. Presacral rectopexy was the most common abdominal procedure (29 cases) followed by presacral rectopexy associated with sigmoidectomy (5 cases). The most common perineal procedure was perineal rectosigmoidectomy associated with levatorplasty (12 cases). Intraoperative bleeding from the presacral space developed in 2 cases, and a rectovaginal fistula occurred in another patient after a perineal rectosigmoidectomy. There were 2 recurrences after a mean follow-up of 49 months, which were treated by reoperation. CONCLUSION: Abdominal and perineal procedures can be used to manage complete rectal prolapse with safety and good long-term results. Age, associated medical conditions, and symptoms of fecal incontinence or constipation are the main features that one should bear in mind in order to choose the best surgical approach.Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP2004-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000400003Revista do Hospital das Clínicas v.59 n.4 2004reponame:Revista do Hospital das Clínicasinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0041-87812004000400003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSobrado,Carlos WalterKiss,Desidério RobertoNahas,Sérgio C.Araújo,Sérgio E. A.Seid,Victor E.Cotti,GuilhermeHabr-Gama,Angelitaeng2004-09-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0041-87812004000400003Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rhcPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.hc@hcnet.usp.br1678-99030041-8781opendoar:2004-09-09T00:00Revista do Hospital das Clínicas - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients
title Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients
spellingShingle Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients
Sobrado,Carlos Walter
Rectal Prolapse
Rectal Procidencia
Surgery
Rectopexy
title_short Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients
title_full Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients
title_fullStr Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients
title_full_unstemmed Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients
title_sort Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients
author Sobrado,Carlos Walter
author_facet Sobrado,Carlos Walter
Kiss,Desidério Roberto
Nahas,Sérgio C.
Araújo,Sérgio E. A.
Seid,Victor E.
Cotti,Guilherme
Habr-Gama,Angelita
author_role author
author2 Kiss,Desidério Roberto
Nahas,Sérgio C.
Araújo,Sérgio E. A.
Seid,Victor E.
Cotti,Guilherme
Habr-Gama,Angelita
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sobrado,Carlos Walter
Kiss,Desidério Roberto
Nahas,Sérgio C.
Araújo,Sérgio E. A.
Seid,Victor E.
Cotti,Guilherme
Habr-Gama,Angelita
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Rectal Prolapse
Rectal Procidencia
Surgery
Rectopexy
topic Rectal Prolapse
Rectal Procidencia
Surgery
Rectopexy
description The "best" surgical technique for the management of complete rectal prolapse remains unknown. Due to its low incidence, it is very difficult to achieve a representative number of cases, and there are no large prospective randomized trials to attest to the superiority of one operation over another. PURPOSE: Analyze the results of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse during 1980 and 2002. METHOD: Retrospective study. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent surgical treatment during this period. The mean age was 56.7 years, with 39 females. Besides the prolapse itself, 33 patients complained of mucous discharge, 31 of fecal incontinence, 14 of constipation, 17 of rectal bleeding, and 3 of urinary incontinence. Abdominal operations were performed in 36 (71%) cases. Presacral rectopexy was the most common abdominal procedure (29 cases) followed by presacral rectopexy associated with sigmoidectomy (5 cases). The most common perineal procedure was perineal rectosigmoidectomy associated with levatorplasty (12 cases). Intraoperative bleeding from the presacral space developed in 2 cases, and a rectovaginal fistula occurred in another patient after a perineal rectosigmoidectomy. There were 2 recurrences after a mean follow-up of 49 months, which were treated by reoperation. CONCLUSION: Abdominal and perineal procedures can be used to manage complete rectal prolapse with safety and good long-term results. Age, associated medical conditions, and symptoms of fecal incontinence or constipation are the main features that one should bear in mind in order to choose the best surgical approach.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000400003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000400003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0041-87812004000400003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Hospital das Clínicas v.59 n.4 2004
reponame:Revista do Hospital das Clínicas
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista do Hospital das Clínicas
collection Revista do Hospital das Clínicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Hospital das Clínicas - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista.hc@hcnet.usp.br
_version_ 1754820894806507520