Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2004 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000400003 |
Resumo: | The "best" surgical technique for the management of complete rectal prolapse remains unknown. Due to its low incidence, it is very difficult to achieve a representative number of cases, and there are no large prospective randomized trials to attest to the superiority of one operation over another. PURPOSE: Analyze the results of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse during 1980 and 2002. METHOD: Retrospective study. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent surgical treatment during this period. The mean age was 56.7 years, with 39 females. Besides the prolapse itself, 33 patients complained of mucous discharge, 31 of fecal incontinence, 14 of constipation, 17 of rectal bleeding, and 3 of urinary incontinence. Abdominal operations were performed in 36 (71%) cases. Presacral rectopexy was the most common abdominal procedure (29 cases) followed by presacral rectopexy associated with sigmoidectomy (5 cases). The most common perineal procedure was perineal rectosigmoidectomy associated with levatorplasty (12 cases). Intraoperative bleeding from the presacral space developed in 2 cases, and a rectovaginal fistula occurred in another patient after a perineal rectosigmoidectomy. There were 2 recurrences after a mean follow-up of 49 months, which were treated by reoperation. CONCLUSION: Abdominal and perineal procedures can be used to manage complete rectal prolapse with safety and good long-term results. Age, associated medical conditions, and symptoms of fecal incontinence or constipation are the main features that one should bear in mind in order to choose the best surgical approach. |
id |
USP-57_0fa1eec3a7335e2dc70101888ce0fc59 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0041-87812004000400003 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-57 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patientsRectal ProlapseRectal ProcidenciaSurgeryRectopexyThe "best" surgical technique for the management of complete rectal prolapse remains unknown. Due to its low incidence, it is very difficult to achieve a representative number of cases, and there are no large prospective randomized trials to attest to the superiority of one operation over another. PURPOSE: Analyze the results of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse during 1980 and 2002. METHOD: Retrospective study. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent surgical treatment during this period. The mean age was 56.7 years, with 39 females. Besides the prolapse itself, 33 patients complained of mucous discharge, 31 of fecal incontinence, 14 of constipation, 17 of rectal bleeding, and 3 of urinary incontinence. Abdominal operations were performed in 36 (71%) cases. Presacral rectopexy was the most common abdominal procedure (29 cases) followed by presacral rectopexy associated with sigmoidectomy (5 cases). The most common perineal procedure was perineal rectosigmoidectomy associated with levatorplasty (12 cases). Intraoperative bleeding from the presacral space developed in 2 cases, and a rectovaginal fistula occurred in another patient after a perineal rectosigmoidectomy. There were 2 recurrences after a mean follow-up of 49 months, which were treated by reoperation. CONCLUSION: Abdominal and perineal procedures can be used to manage complete rectal prolapse with safety and good long-term results. Age, associated medical conditions, and symptoms of fecal incontinence or constipation are the main features that one should bear in mind in order to choose the best surgical approach.Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP2004-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000400003Revista do Hospital das Clínicas v.59 n.4 2004reponame:Revista do Hospital das Clínicasinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0041-87812004000400003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSobrado,Carlos WalterKiss,Desidério RobertoNahas,Sérgio C.Araújo,Sérgio E. A.Seid,Victor E.Cotti,GuilhermeHabr-Gama,Angelitaeng2004-09-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0041-87812004000400003Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rhcPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.hc@hcnet.usp.br1678-99030041-8781opendoar:2004-09-09T00:00Revista do Hospital das Clínicas - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients |
title |
Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients |
spellingShingle |
Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients Sobrado,Carlos Walter Rectal Prolapse Rectal Procidencia Surgery Rectopexy |
title_short |
Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients |
title_full |
Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients |
title_fullStr |
Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients |
title_sort |
Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients |
author |
Sobrado,Carlos Walter |
author_facet |
Sobrado,Carlos Walter Kiss,Desidério Roberto Nahas,Sérgio C. Araújo,Sérgio E. A. Seid,Victor E. Cotti,Guilherme Habr-Gama,Angelita |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kiss,Desidério Roberto Nahas,Sérgio C. Araújo,Sérgio E. A. Seid,Victor E. Cotti,Guilherme Habr-Gama,Angelita |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sobrado,Carlos Walter Kiss,Desidério Roberto Nahas,Sérgio C. Araújo,Sérgio E. A. Seid,Victor E. Cotti,Guilherme Habr-Gama,Angelita |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rectal Prolapse Rectal Procidencia Surgery Rectopexy |
topic |
Rectal Prolapse Rectal Procidencia Surgery Rectopexy |
description |
The "best" surgical technique for the management of complete rectal prolapse remains unknown. Due to its low incidence, it is very difficult to achieve a representative number of cases, and there are no large prospective randomized trials to attest to the superiority of one operation over another. PURPOSE: Analyze the results of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse during 1980 and 2002. METHOD: Retrospective study. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent surgical treatment during this period. The mean age was 56.7 years, with 39 females. Besides the prolapse itself, 33 patients complained of mucous discharge, 31 of fecal incontinence, 14 of constipation, 17 of rectal bleeding, and 3 of urinary incontinence. Abdominal operations were performed in 36 (71%) cases. Presacral rectopexy was the most common abdominal procedure (29 cases) followed by presacral rectopexy associated with sigmoidectomy (5 cases). The most common perineal procedure was perineal rectosigmoidectomy associated with levatorplasty (12 cases). Intraoperative bleeding from the presacral space developed in 2 cases, and a rectovaginal fistula occurred in another patient after a perineal rectosigmoidectomy. There were 2 recurrences after a mean follow-up of 49 months, which were treated by reoperation. CONCLUSION: Abdominal and perineal procedures can be used to manage complete rectal prolapse with safety and good long-term results. Age, associated medical conditions, and symptoms of fecal incontinence or constipation are the main features that one should bear in mind in order to choose the best surgical approach. |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000400003 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000400003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0041-87812004000400003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas v.59 n.4 2004 reponame:Revista do Hospital das Clínicas instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
collection |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista.hc@hcnet.usp.br |
_version_ |
1754820894806507520 |