The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2004 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000500016 |
Resumo: | In men with prior vasectomy, microsurgical reconstruction of the reproductive tract is more cost-effective than sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection if the obstructive interval is less than 15 years and no female fertility risk factors are present. If epididymal obstruction is detected or advanced female age is present, the decision to use either microsurgical reconstruction or sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection should be individualized. Sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection is preferred to surgical treatment when female factors requiring in vitro fertilization are present or when the chance for success with sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection exceeds the chance for success with surgical treatment. |
id |
USP-57_ad22142045d753444ad3e8e4e78cea29 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0041-87812004000500016 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-57 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal?SemenVasectomyReversalReproductionFertilizationInfertilityIn men with prior vasectomy, microsurgical reconstruction of the reproductive tract is more cost-effective than sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection if the obstructive interval is less than 15 years and no female fertility risk factors are present. If epididymal obstruction is detected or advanced female age is present, the decision to use either microsurgical reconstruction or sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection should be individualized. Sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection is preferred to surgical treatment when female factors requiring in vitro fertilization are present or when the chance for success with sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection exceeds the chance for success with surgical treatment.Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP2004-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000500016Revista do Hospital das Clínicas v.59 n.5 2004reponame:Revista do Hospital das Clínicasinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0041-87812004000500016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPasqualotto,Fábio FirmbachLucon,Antônio MarmoSobreiro,Bernardo PassosPasqualotto,Eleonora BedinArap,Samieng2004-10-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0041-87812004000500016Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rhcPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.hc@hcnet.usp.br1678-99030041-8781opendoar:2004-10-29T00:00Revista do Hospital das Clínicas - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal? |
title |
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal? |
spellingShingle |
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal? Pasqualotto,Fábio Firmbach Semen Vasectomy Reversal Reproduction Fertilization Infertility |
title_short |
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal? |
title_full |
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal? |
title_fullStr |
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal? |
title_sort |
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal? |
author |
Pasqualotto,Fábio Firmbach |
author_facet |
Pasqualotto,Fábio Firmbach Lucon,Antônio Marmo Sobreiro,Bernardo Passos Pasqualotto,Eleonora Bedin Arap,Sami |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lucon,Antônio Marmo Sobreiro,Bernardo Passos Pasqualotto,Eleonora Bedin Arap,Sami |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pasqualotto,Fábio Firmbach Lucon,Antônio Marmo Sobreiro,Bernardo Passos Pasqualotto,Eleonora Bedin Arap,Sami |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Semen Vasectomy Reversal Reproduction Fertilization Infertility |
topic |
Semen Vasectomy Reversal Reproduction Fertilization Infertility |
description |
In men with prior vasectomy, microsurgical reconstruction of the reproductive tract is more cost-effective than sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection if the obstructive interval is less than 15 years and no female fertility risk factors are present. If epididymal obstruction is detected or advanced female age is present, the decision to use either microsurgical reconstruction or sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection should be individualized. Sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection is preferred to surgical treatment when female factors requiring in vitro fertilization are present or when the chance for success with sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection exceeds the chance for success with surgical treatment. |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000500016 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-87812004000500016 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0041-87812004000500016 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Medicina / Universidade de São Paulo - FM/USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas v.59 n.5 2004 reponame:Revista do Hospital das Clínicas instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
collection |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Hospital das Clínicas - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista.hc@hcnet.usp.br |
_version_ |
1754820894846353408 |