ACCOUNTING AND TAXABLE INCOMES: EFFECTS OF TRANSITION TAX REGIME (RTT)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de contabilidade e organizações |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rco/article/view/55517 |
Resumo: | Law 11.638/07 represents the beginning of convergence of Brazilian accounting practices towards international standards established by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) introducing significant changes, such as implementation of the principle of essence over form – in other words, the prevalence of an economic outlook on financial accounting – whereas a civil stance was adopted mostly for tax accounting, which conversely focuses on form.As the new accounting rules would have a positive, null or negative impact on taxable income, the Transition Tax Regime (RTT) was established as of 2008. The aim was to neutralize all new criteria for recognizing revenues, expenses or costs.Companies had the option to adopt this new regime or not along 2008-2009, however, adoption became mandatory as of 2010. Nevertheless, companies found it difficult to carry the process through due to the original term, which expired on October 16th, 2009, before the end of the last quarter, and issues concerning the interpretation of the new accounting standards and their effects on tax legislation.The main purpose of this article is to analyse the effect of RTT on taxable income and accounting income in 2008 and 2009 and compare them with a mean of period 2005 to 2007 for taxable income companies that did not opt for this Regime, broken down into four sectors: agriculture, commerce, industry and services.The methodology was based on data from 2005 to 2009 authorized by Federal Treasury and the study sample consisted of 69,712 taxable income companies (65%) that did not opt for the RTT.On April 13th, 2010, Normative Instruction 1.023/10 extended the initial deadline however from these amendments, only 973 companies decided to adopt the RTT, suggests that a good analysis of the accountants.By comparing the period of 2008-2009 to that of 2005-2007, the value of five variables was obtained, namely, taxable income, accounting income, the difference between them, gross revenue and gross profit. Evidences has found that the companies that did not opt for the RTT paid less income tax (IRPJ) and social contribution on net profit (CSLL) in 2008-2009. |
id |
USP-65_ada0c6a11f451abe201d7411df9e4933 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/55517 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-65 |
network_name_str |
Revista de contabilidade e organizações |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ACCOUNTING AND TAXABLE INCOMES: EFFECTS OF TRANSITION TAX REGIME (RTT)EFEITOS DO REGIME TRIBUTÁRIO DE TRANSIÇÃO NA CARGA TRIBUTÁRIA DAS COMPANHIAS BRASILEIRASlucro contábillucro fiscalRegime Tributário de Transição - RTTaccounting incometaxable incomeTransition Tax Regime (RTT).Law 11.638/07 represents the beginning of convergence of Brazilian accounting practices towards international standards established by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) introducing significant changes, such as implementation of the principle of essence over form – in other words, the prevalence of an economic outlook on financial accounting – whereas a civil stance was adopted mostly for tax accounting, which conversely focuses on form.As the new accounting rules would have a positive, null or negative impact on taxable income, the Transition Tax Regime (RTT) was established as of 2008. The aim was to neutralize all new criteria for recognizing revenues, expenses or costs.Companies had the option to adopt this new regime or not along 2008-2009, however, adoption became mandatory as of 2010. Nevertheless, companies found it difficult to carry the process through due to the original term, which expired on October 16th, 2009, before the end of the last quarter, and issues concerning the interpretation of the new accounting standards and their effects on tax legislation.The main purpose of this article is to analyse the effect of RTT on taxable income and accounting income in 2008 and 2009 and compare them with a mean of period 2005 to 2007 for taxable income companies that did not opt for this Regime, broken down into four sectors: agriculture, commerce, industry and services.The methodology was based on data from 2005 to 2009 authorized by Federal Treasury and the study sample consisted of 69,712 taxable income companies (65%) that did not opt for the RTT.On April 13th, 2010, Normative Instruction 1.023/10 extended the initial deadline however from these amendments, only 973 companies decided to adopt the RTT, suggests that a good analysis of the accountants.By comparing the period of 2008-2009 to that of 2005-2007, the value of five variables was obtained, namely, taxable income, accounting income, the difference between them, gross revenue and gross profit. Evidences has found that the companies that did not opt for the RTT paid less income tax (IRPJ) and social contribution on net profit (CSLL) in 2008-2009.A Lei nº 11.638/07 iniciou a convergência da contabilidade brasileira para as normas internacionais do IASB promovendo, entre outras, uma relevante modificação: a implementação da ampla hegemonia da essência sobre a forma – dito de outro modo, a prevalência da visão econômica na contabilidade financeira –, enquanto se manteve na contabilidade fiscal, majoritariamente, a predominância da perspectiva civil, que de forma inversa, privilegia a forma. Como os efeitos das novas regras contábeis causariam impacto positivo, nulo ou negativo no lucro tributário, a partir de 2008, foi instituído o Regime Tributário de Transição–RTT, com o objetivo de neutralizar-se todos os novos critérios de reconhecimento de receitas, despesas ou custos. As empresas ainda puderam, no biênio 2008-2009, optar ou não por esse novo regime, mas, a partir de 2010, sua adoção se tornou obrigatória. Entretanto, tratou-se de decisão difícil, principalmente, porque o prazo original era até 16/10/2009, quando o último trimestre ainda não estava encerrado e, também, pela insegurança na interpretação das novas normas contábeis e dos seus efeitos na legislação fiscal. O objetivo principal deste artigo é avaliar se houve redução da carga tributária com a não opção pelo RTT. Para tal, analisou-se o efeito do RTT nos resultados fiscal e contábil dos anos de 2008 e 2009 em comparação com a média no período de 2005 a 2007 para as empresas de lucro real que não optaram por esse regime, discriminados pelos quatro setores: agricultura, comércio, indústria e serviços. A metodologia baseou-se nos dados de 2005 a 2009, autorizados pela Receita Federal do Brasil, e a amostra pesquisada foi composta por 69.712 empresas de lucro real (65%) que não optaram pelo RTT. Em 13/04/2010, a IN RFB nº 1.023/10 reabriu o prazo para opção, mas apenas 973 empresas modificaram a opção – de não para sim – pelo RTT que sugere uma boa análise dos contadores. A partir da comparação dos períodos 2008-2009 com 2005-2007, foram apurados os valores de cinco variáveis, quais sejam, receita e lucro brutos, lucros fiscal e contábil e a diferença entre os dois últimos e foram encontradas evidências estatísticas com base no teste de Wilcoxon de que as empresas que não optaram pelo RTT pagaram menos IRPJ e CSLL em 2008-2009.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto2013-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rco/article/view/5551710.11606/rco.v7i19.55517Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações; Vol. 7 No. 19 (2013); 3-15Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações; Vol. 7 Núm. 19 (2013); 3-15Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações; v. 7 n. 19 (2013); 3-151982-6486reponame:Revista de contabilidade e organizaçõesinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rco/article/view/55517/72254https://www.revistas.usp.br/rco/article/view/55517/147563Mello, Helio Rieger deSalotti, Bruno Meirellesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-06-25T13:36:58Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/55517Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rcoPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rco/oairco@usp.br1982-64861982-6486opendoar:2020-06-25T13:36:58Revista de contabilidade e organizações - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ACCOUNTING AND TAXABLE INCOMES: EFFECTS OF TRANSITION TAX REGIME (RTT) EFEITOS DO REGIME TRIBUTÁRIO DE TRANSIÇÃO NA CARGA TRIBUTÁRIA DAS COMPANHIAS BRASILEIRAS |
title |
ACCOUNTING AND TAXABLE INCOMES: EFFECTS OF TRANSITION TAX REGIME (RTT) |
spellingShingle |
ACCOUNTING AND TAXABLE INCOMES: EFFECTS OF TRANSITION TAX REGIME (RTT) Mello, Helio Rieger de lucro contábil lucro fiscal Regime Tributário de Transição - RTT accounting income taxable income Transition Tax Regime (RTT). |
title_short |
ACCOUNTING AND TAXABLE INCOMES: EFFECTS OF TRANSITION TAX REGIME (RTT) |
title_full |
ACCOUNTING AND TAXABLE INCOMES: EFFECTS OF TRANSITION TAX REGIME (RTT) |
title_fullStr |
ACCOUNTING AND TAXABLE INCOMES: EFFECTS OF TRANSITION TAX REGIME (RTT) |
title_full_unstemmed |
ACCOUNTING AND TAXABLE INCOMES: EFFECTS OF TRANSITION TAX REGIME (RTT) |
title_sort |
ACCOUNTING AND TAXABLE INCOMES: EFFECTS OF TRANSITION TAX REGIME (RTT) |
author |
Mello, Helio Rieger de |
author_facet |
Mello, Helio Rieger de Salotti, Bruno Meirelles |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Salotti, Bruno Meirelles |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mello, Helio Rieger de Salotti, Bruno Meirelles |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
lucro contábil lucro fiscal Regime Tributário de Transição - RTT accounting income taxable income Transition Tax Regime (RTT). |
topic |
lucro contábil lucro fiscal Regime Tributário de Transição - RTT accounting income taxable income Transition Tax Regime (RTT). |
description |
Law 11.638/07 represents the beginning of convergence of Brazilian accounting practices towards international standards established by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) introducing significant changes, such as implementation of the principle of essence over form – in other words, the prevalence of an economic outlook on financial accounting – whereas a civil stance was adopted mostly for tax accounting, which conversely focuses on form.As the new accounting rules would have a positive, null or negative impact on taxable income, the Transition Tax Regime (RTT) was established as of 2008. The aim was to neutralize all new criteria for recognizing revenues, expenses or costs.Companies had the option to adopt this new regime or not along 2008-2009, however, adoption became mandatory as of 2010. Nevertheless, companies found it difficult to carry the process through due to the original term, which expired on October 16th, 2009, before the end of the last quarter, and issues concerning the interpretation of the new accounting standards and their effects on tax legislation.The main purpose of this article is to analyse the effect of RTT on taxable income and accounting income in 2008 and 2009 and compare them with a mean of period 2005 to 2007 for taxable income companies that did not opt for this Regime, broken down into four sectors: agriculture, commerce, industry and services.The methodology was based on data from 2005 to 2009 authorized by Federal Treasury and the study sample consisted of 69,712 taxable income companies (65%) that did not opt for the RTT.On April 13th, 2010, Normative Instruction 1.023/10 extended the initial deadline however from these amendments, only 973 companies decided to adopt the RTT, suggests that a good analysis of the accountants.By comparing the period of 2008-2009 to that of 2005-2007, the value of five variables was obtained, namely, taxable income, accounting income, the difference between them, gross revenue and gross profit. Evidences has found that the companies that did not opt for the RTT paid less income tax (IRPJ) and social contribution on net profit (CSLL) in 2008-2009. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rco/article/view/55517 10.11606/rco.v7i19.55517 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rco/article/view/55517 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/rco.v7i19.55517 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rco/article/view/55517/72254 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rco/article/view/55517/147563 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações; Vol. 7 No. 19 (2013); 3-15 Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações; Vol. 7 Núm. 19 (2013); 3-15 Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações; v. 7 n. 19 (2013); 3-15 1982-6486 reponame:Revista de contabilidade e organizações instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de contabilidade e organizações |
collection |
Revista de contabilidade e organizações |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de contabilidade e organizações - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rco@usp.br |
_version_ |
1797054144773619712 |